Time-variant analysis of fast-fMRI and dynamic contrast agent MRI sequences as examples of 4-dimensional image analysis

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 643-650

  Leistritz, L ^a   Hesse, W ^a   Wustenberg T ^b   Fitzek, C ^a   Reichenbach, J R ^a   Witte, H ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrast agent MRI; Directed information transfer; Dynamic Neural Networks; Functional MRI; Granger causality; Time variant analysis methods

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MOTOR CORTEX; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STROKE;

EID: 33845940487     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634129     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baccala LA, Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 2001; 84 (6): 463-74.
2. Winterhalder M, Schelter B, Hesse W, Schwab K, Leistritz L, Klan D, et al. Comparison directed of linear signal processing techniques to infer interactions in multivariate neural systems. Signal Processing 2005; 85 (11): 2137-60.
3. Hesse W, Möller E, Arnold M, Schack B. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J Neurosci Methods 2003; 124 (1): 27-44.
4. Kaminski M, Ding MZ, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybern 2001; 85 (2): 145-57.
5. Granger CWJ. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica 1969; 37 (3): 424-38.
6. Geweke J. Measurement of Linear-Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time-Series. J Am Stat Assoc 1982; 77 (378): 304-13.
7. Bernasconi C, König P. On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings. Biol Cybern 1999; 81 (3): 199-210.
8. Bernasconi C, von Stein A, Chiang C, König P. Bi-directional interactions between visual areas in the awake behaving cat. Neuroreport 2000; 11 (4): 689-92.
9. Galicki M, Leistritz L, Witte H. Learning continuous trajectories in recurrent neural networks with time-dependent weights. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1999; 10 (4): 741-56.
10. Galicki M, Leistritz L, Zwick EB, Witte H. Improving Generalization Capabilities of Dynamic Neural Networks, Neural Computation 2004; 16 (6): 1253-82.
11. Cunnington R, Windischberger C, Deecke L, Moser E. The preparation and readiness for voluntary movement: a high-field event-related fMRI study of the Bereitschafts-BOLD response. Neuroimage 2003; 20 (1): 404-12.
12. Wildgruber D, Erb M, Klose U, Grodd W. Sequential activation of supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex during self-paced finger movement in human evaluated by functional MRI. Neuroscience Letters 1997; 227 (3): 161-4.
13. Yousry TA, Schmid UD, Alkadhi H, Schmidt D, Peraud A, Buettner A, et al. Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus - A new landmark. Brain 1997; 120: 141-57.
14. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline IB, Frith C, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical Parametric Maps in Functional Imaging: A General Linear Approach. Human Brain Mapping 1995; 2: 189-210.
15. Möller E, Schack B, Arnold M, Witte H. Instantaneous multivariate EEG coherence analysis by means of adaptive high-dimensional autoregressive models. J Neurosci Methods 2001; 105 (2): 143-58.
16. Morgan VL, Price RR. The effect of sensorimotor activation on functional connectivity mapping with MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2004; 22 (8): 1069-75.
17. Fukunaga K. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. 2nd ed: Academic Press; 1990.
18. Goebel R, Roebroeck A, Kim DS, Formisano E. Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2003; 21 (10): 1251-61.
19. Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage. 2005; 25 (1): 230-42.
20. Hesse W, Wüstenberg T, Witte H. Untersuchung zeitvarianter gerichteter Interaktionen im fast fMRI unter Nutzung der adaptiven Granger-Kausalität. Biomedizinische Technik. Supplement 2, 2004; 49: 314-5.
21. Arnold M, Günther R. Adaptive parameter estimation in multivariate self-exciting threshold autoregressive models. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 2001; 30 (2): 257-75.
22. Leistritz L, Galicki M, Kochs E, Zwick EB, Fitzek C, Reichenbach JR, et al. Application of Generalized Dynamic Neural Networks to Biomedical Data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2006; accepted.