Reliability of the reported size of removed colorectal polyps

Anticancer Research

Volumn 26, Issue 6 C, 2006, Pages 4895-4899

  Rubio, Carlos A ^a,d   Grimelius, Lars ^a   Lindholm, Johan ^a   Hamberg, Hans ^a   Porwit, Anja ^a   Elmberger, Göran ^a   Höög, Anders ^a   Kanter, Lena ^a   Eriksson, Elina ^a   Stemme, Sten ^a   Orrego, Abiel ^a   Saft, Leonie ^a   Petersson, Fredrik ^a   De La Torre, Manuel ^a   Ekström, Christina ^a   Åström, Kristina ^a   Rundgren, Åsa ^a   Djokic, Miroslav ^a   Chandanos, E ^a   Lenander, Claes ^b   Machado, Mikael ^b   Nilsson, Per ^b   Mattsson, Lars ^c   more..

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b Ersta Diacony Hospital   (Sweden)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Colorectal; Polyps size

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLORECTAL POLYP; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RECTUM POLYP; SURGEON; TUMOR VOLUME;

COLONIC DISEASES; HUMANS; INTESTINAL POLYPS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; RECTAL DISEASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33845927436     PISSN: 02507005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Esmarch F: Die Krankheiten des Mastdarmes und desAfters. Deutsche Chirurgie. Bd 48 Stuttgart, 1887.
2. Feyter F: Zur Geschwulstlehre (nach Untersuchungen am menschichlen Darm): Polypen und Krebs. Beitr Pathol Anat 86: 663-759, 1931.
3. Cooper HS: Surgical pathology of endoscopically removed malignant polyps of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg Pathol 7: 613-623, 1983.
4. Muto T, Bussey HJ and Morson BC: The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36: 2251-2270, 1975.
5. Schoen RE, Gerber LD and Margulies C: The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 46: 492-496, 1997.
6. Hoff G and Vatn M: Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Endoscopic evaluation of size and localization of polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 20: 356-360, 1985.
7. Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U, Markert RJ, Peace N, Bhutani MS and Barde CJ: Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? Gastrointest Endosc 46: 497-502, 1997.
8. Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA and Beck GJ: Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 51: 433-437, 2000.
9. Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG, Bond JH, Ansel H, Waye JD, Hall D, Hamlin JA, Schapiro M, O'Brien MJ, Sternberg SS and Gottlieb LS: A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. N Engl J Med 342: 1766-1772, 2000.
10. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Lavin PT, Rosen MP and Raptopoulos V: CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181: 1593-1598, 2003.
11. Vogt C, Cohnen M, Beck A, vom Dahl S, Aurich V, Modder U and Haussinger D: Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution videocolonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 60: 201-209, 2004.
12. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI and Atkin W: CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237: 893-904, 2005.
13. Rubio CA, Nesi G and Kato Y: Serrated and microtubular adenomas of the colon and rectum. An 8-years histological survey. Anticancer Res 23: 1693-1696, 2003.