Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 803-808

  Euliano, Tammy ^a   Skowronski, Mark ^b   Marossero, Dorothee ^c   Shuster, Jonathan ^d   Edwards, Rodney ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^c Convergent Engineering ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrohysterography; Labor; Uterine activity monitoring

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROGRAPHY; INTRAUTERINE PRESSURE; LABOR; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NURSE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSABDONIMAL ELECTROHYSTEROGRAPHY; UTERUS CONTRACTION; WAVEFORM;

EID: 33845922055     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767050601023657     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Huey JR, Miller FC. Evaluation of uterine activity - comparative analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:252-256.
2. Miller FC, Yeh SY, Schifrin BS, Paul RH, Hon EH. Quantitation of uterine activity in 100 primiparous patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;124:398-405.
3. Wolfs G, van Leeuwen M, Rottinghuis H, Boeles JT. An electromyographic study of the human uterus during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1971;37:241-246.
4. Wikland M, Lindblom B. Relationship between electrical and mechanical activity of the isolated term-pregnant human myometrium. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1985;20:337-346.
5. Buhimschi C, Boyle MB, Garfield RE. Electrical activity of the human uterus during pregnancy as recorded from the abdominal surface. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:102-111.
6. Devedeux D, Marque C, Mansour S, Germain G, Duchene J. Uterine electromyography: A critical review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1636-1653.
7. Mansour S, Devedeux D, Germain G, Marque C, Duchene J. Uterine EMG spectral analysis and relationship to mechanical activity in pregnant monkeys. Med Biol Eng Comput 1996;34:115-121.
8. Verdenik I, Pajntar M, Leskosek B. Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;95:149-153.
9. Agarwal N, Suneja A, Arora S, Tandon OP, Sircar S. Role of uterine artery velocimetry using color-flow Doppler and electromyography of uterus in prediction of preterm labor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004;30:402-408.
10. Maner WL, Garfield RE, Maul H, Olson G, Saade G. Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:1254-1260.
11. Khalil M, Duchene J. Uterine EMG analysis: A dynamic approach for change detection and classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2000;47:748-756.
12. Maul H, Maner WL, Olson G, Saade GR, Garfield RE. Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:297-301.
13. Haykin S. Adaptive filter theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2001.
14. Marossero DE, Erdgomus D, Euliano N, Principe JC, Hild KE. Independent components analysis for fetal electrocardiogram extraction: A case for the data efficient mermaid algorithm. IEEE 13th Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing; 2003; Toulouse, France. pp 399-408.
15. Skowronski MD, Harris JG, Marossero DE, Edwards RK, Euliano T. Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006;53:1983-1989.
16. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Savage KG, Hauth JC. Active phase labor arrest: Revisiting the 2-hour minimum. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:550-554.
17. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Active-phase labor arrest: Oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:323-328.
18. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1445-1454.
19. De Luca CJ. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomechanics 1997;13:135-163.
20. Allman AC, Genevier ES, Johnson MR, Steer PJ. Head-to-cervix force: An important physiological variable in labour. 2. Peak active force, peak active pressure and mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:769-775.
21. Gough GW, Randall NJ, Genevier ES, Sutherland IA, Steer PJ. Head-to-cervix forces and their relationship to the outcome of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:613-618.