Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1983-1989

  Skowronski, Mark D ^a   Harris, John G ^a   Marossero, Dorothee E ^b   Edwards, Rodney K ^c   Euliano, Tammy Yachabach ^d  

^a J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^b Convergent Engineering ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrohysterography; Intrauterine pressure catheter; Wiener filter prediction

Indexed keywords

ELECTROHYSTEROGRAPHY; INTRAUTERINE PRESSURE CATHETERS; WIENER FILTER PREDICTION;

DATA ACQUISITION; ERROR DETECTION; FIR FILTERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATIENT MONITORING; SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FILTER; HUMAN; HYSTEROGRAPHY; INTRAUTERINE PRESSURE; LABOR; MODEL; PREDICTION; RECORDING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MANOMETRY; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PREGNANCY; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; UTERINE CONTRACTION; UTERINE MONITORING; UTERUS;

EID: 33749523386     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2006.877104     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. H. Maul, W. L. Maner, G. Olson, G. R. Saade, and R. E. Garfield, "Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery," J. Mater.-Fet. Neonat. Med., vol. 15, pp. 297-301, 2004.
2. D. Devedeux, C. Marque, S. Mansour, G. Germain, and J. Duchêne, "Uterine electromyography: A critical review," Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 1636-1653, 1993.
3. C. Buhimschi, M. B. Boyle, and R. E. Garfield, "Electrical activity of the human uterus during pregnancy as recorded from the abdominal surface," Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 102-111, 1997.
4. W. L. Maner, R. E. Garfield, H. Maul, G. Olson, and G. Saade, "Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography," Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1254-1260, 2003.
5. S. Snowden, N. A. B. Simpson, and J. J. Walker, "A digital system for recording the electrical activity of the uterus," Physiol. Meas., vol. 22, pp. 673-679, 2001.
6. S. Graczyk, J. Jezewski, K. Horoba, and J. Wrobel, "Analysis of abdominal electrical activity of uterus - Approximate entropy approach," presented at the 22nd annual EMBS Int. Conf., Chicago, IL, Jul. 2000.
7. D. E. Marossero, D. Erdgomus, N. Euliano, J. C. Principe, and K. E. Hild, II, "Independent components analysis for fetal electrocardiogram extraction: A case for the data efficient mermaid algorithm," in Proc. IEEE 13th Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing, Toulouse, France, Sep. 2003, pp. 399-408.
8. H. Leman, C. Marque, and J. Gondry, "Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1222-1229, Oct. 1999.
9. J. Finsterer, "EMG-interference pattern analysis," J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., vol. 11, pp. 231-246, 2001.
10. C. J. De Luca, "The use of surface electromyography in biomechancis," J. Appl. Biomech., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 135-163, 1997.
11. S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001.
12. P. M. Clarkson, Ed., Optimal and Adaptive Signal Processing Boca Raton, FL, CRC, 1993.
13. R. A. Roberts and C. T. Mullis, Digital Signal Processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1987.
14. R. Caldeyro-Barcia and J. Poseiro, "Physiology of the uterine contraction," Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 3, pp. 386-408, 1960.
15. W. G. Hopkins, A New View of Statistics Internet Society for Sport Science, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/
16. MATLAB 7.1. Natick, MA, The MathWorks Inc.. Natick, MA, 2003.
17. R. Nagarajan, H. Eswaran, J. D. Wilson, P. Murphy, C. Lowery, and H. Preißl, "Analysis of uterine contractions: A dynamical approach," J. Mater.-Fet. Neonat. Med., vol. 14, pp. 8-21, 2003.
18. M. A. Dowdle, "Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor," J. Reprod. Med., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 501-505, 2003.
19. S. Arulkumaran, M. Yang, C. Y. Tien, and S. S. Ratnam, "Reliability of intrauterine pressure measurements," Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 800-802, 1991.
20. H. Leman and C. Marque, "Rejection of the maternal electrocardiogram in the electrohysterogram signal," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1010-1017, Aug. 2000.