Comparative efficacy of family and group treatment for adolescent substance abuse

American Journal on Addictions

Volumn 15, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages s131-s136

  Smith, Douglas C ^a   Hall, James A ^a   Williams, Julie K ^a   An, Hyonggin ^b   Gotman, Nathan ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTINENCE; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DISEASE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FAMILY THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REMISSION; SEVEN CHALLENGES; STRENGTHS ORIENTED FAMILY THERAPY; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 33845904644     PISSN: 10550496     EISSN: 15210391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10550490601006253     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kandel DB, Davies M, Karus D, Yamaguchi K. The consequences in young adulthood of adolescent drug involvement: An overview. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1986;43:746-754.
2. Dennis ML, Dawud-Noursi S, Muck RD, McDermeit M. The need for developing and evaluating adolescent treatment models. In: Stevens S, Morral A, eds. Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment in the United States: Exemplary Models from a National Evaluation Study. New York: The Haworth Press; 2003:3-34.
3. Godley SH, Jones N, Funk R, Ives M, Passetti LL. Comparing outcomes of best-practice and research-based outpatient treatment protocols for adolescents. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2004;36:35-48.
4. Dennis ML, Godley SH, Diamond G, et al. The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: Main findings from two randomized trials. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2004;27:197-213.
5. Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onken LS. A stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started and moving on from stage I. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2001;8:133-142.
6. Waldron HB. Adolescent substance abuse and family therapy outcome: A review of randomized trials. In: Ollendick TH, Prinz RJ, eds. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology. New York: Plenum Press; 1997:199-234.
7. Williams RJ, Chang SY. A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology-Science & Practice. 2000;7:138-166.
8. Berg IK, Miller SD. Working with the Problem Drinker: A Solution-Focused Approach. New York: W.W. Norton; 1992.
9. Smith DC, Hall JA. Strengths Oriented Family Therapy for Adolescent Substance Abuse, Social Work Under review.
10. Schwebel R. The Seven Challenges: Challenging Ourselves to make wise Decisions about Alcohol and other Drugs. Tucson, AZ: Viva Press; 1995.
11. Schwebel R. The Seven Challenges Manual. Tucson, AZ: Viva Press; 2004.
12. Luborsky L, Singer B, Luborsky L. Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that "everyone has won and all must have prizes"? Archives of General Psychiatry. 1975;32:995-1008.
13. Smith DC, Hall JA. Strengths-Oriented Referral for Teens (SORT): Giving balanced feedback to teens and families. Health & Social Work. in press.
14. Dennis ML, Titus JC, White MK, Unsicker JI, Hodgkins D. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Administration guide for the GAIN and related measures. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 2002.
15. Dennis ML, Funk R, Godley SH, Godley MD, Waldron H. Cross-validation of the alcohol and cannabis use measures in the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) and Timeline Followback (TLFB; Form 90) among adolescents in substance abuse treatment. Addiction. 2004;99(Suppl 2):120-128.
16. Buchan BJ, Dennis ML, Tims FM, Diamond GS. Cannabis use: Consistency and validity of self-report, on-site urine testing and laboratory testing. Addiction. 2002;97(Suppl 1):98-108.
17. Tooze JA, Grunwald GK, Jones RH. Analysis of repeated measures data with clumping at zero. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2002;11:341-355.
18. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's guide. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing; 2004.
19. Stinchfield RD, Niforopulos L, Feder SH. Follow-up bias in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1994;55:285-289.
20. Godley SH, Dennis ML, Godley MD, Funk RR. Thirty-month relapse trajectory cluster groups among adolescents discharged from out-patient treatment. Addiction. 2004;99(Suppl 2):129-139.