A semi-supervised learning method for remote sensing data mining

Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 207-211

  Vatsavai, Ranga Raju ^a,b   Shekhar, Shashi ^a   Burk, Thomas E ^b  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

EM; GMM; MAP; MLE; Semi supervised learning

Indexed keywords

EXPECTATION-MAXIMIZATION (EM); IMAGE DATABASES; SUPERVISED LEARNING; THEMATIC INFORMATION EXTRACTION;

ALGORITHMS; CLIMATE CHANGE; DATA MINING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REMOTE SENSING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845884299     PISSN: 10823409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICTAI.2005.17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. J. Bilmes. A gentle tutorial on the em algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for gaussian mixture and hidden markov models. Technical Report, University of Berkeley, ICSI-TR-97-021, 1997., 1997.
2. F. Cozman, I. Cohen, and M. Cirelo. Semi-supervised learning of mixture models. In Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2003.
3. A. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1): 1-38, 1977.
4. R. Duin. Classifiers in almost empty spaces. In Proc. 15th Int. Conference on Pattern Recognition (Barcelona, Spain, Sep.3-7), vol. 2, IEEE Computer Society Press, pages 1-7., 2000.
5. K. Fukunaga and R. R. Hayes. Effects of sample size in classifier design. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 13(3):252-264, 1989.
6. S. Goldman and Y. Zhou. Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. In Proc. 17th International Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 327-334. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2000.
7. J. R. Jensen. Introductory Digital Image Processing, A Remote Sensing Perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ-07458, 1996.
8. T. Mitchell. The role of unlabeled data in supervised learning. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Colloquium on Cognitive Science, San Sebastian, Spain., 1999.
9. K. Nigam, A. K. McCallum, S. Thrun, and T. M. Mitchell. Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Machine Learning, 39(2/3): 103-134, 2000.
10. S. Raudys. On dimensionality, sample size, and classification error of nonparametric linear classification algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 19(6):667-671, 1997.
11. S. J. Raudys and A. K. Jain. Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: Recommendations for practitioners. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 13(3):252-264, 1991.
12. J. A. Richards and X. Jia. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Springer, New York, 1999.
13. B. Shahshahani and D. Landgrebe. The effect of unlabeled samples in reducing the small sample size problem and mitigating the hughes phenomenon. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(5), 1994.
14. M. Skurichina and R. Duin. Stabilizing classifiers for very small sample sizes. In Proc. 10th Int. Conference on Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society Press, pages 891-896, 1996.
15. S. Tadjudin and D. A. Landgrebe. Covariance estimation with limited training samples. IEEE Trans. Geosciences and Remote Sensing., 37(4):2113-2118, 1999.