Making your home a shelter: Electronic monitoring and victim re-entry in domestic violence cases

British Journal of Criminology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 100-120

  Erez, Edna ^a   Ibarra, Peter R ^b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845807298     PISSN: 00070955     EISSN: 14643529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azl026     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. DAVIS, N.J. (1988), 'Shelters for Battered Women: Social Policy Response to Interpersonal Violence', The Social Science Journal, 25: 401-19.
2. DUTTON, M. A. (1996), 'Battered Women's Strategic Response to Violence: The Role of Context', in J. L. Edleson and Z. C. Eisikovits, eds, Future Interventions with Battered Women and their Families, 105-24. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. EREZ, E. and BELKNAP, J. (1998). 'In their Own Words: Battered Women's Assessment of the Criminal Processing System's Responses', Violence and Victims, 13: 251-68.
4. EREZ, E. and SEBBA, L. (1999), 'From Individualization of the Offender to Individualization of the Victim', in W. Laufer and F. Adler, eds, Advances in Criminological Theory, 171-98. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
5. EREZ, E., IBARRA, P. R. and LURIE, N. A. (2004), 'Applying Electronic Monitoring to Domestic Violence Cases: A Study of Two Bilateral Programs', Federal Probation, 68(1): 15-20.
6. FEELEY, M. M. and SIMON, J. (1992), 'The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications', Criminology, 30: 449-74.
7. FORD, D. A. (1991), 'Prosecution as a Victim Power Resource: A Note on Empowering Women in Violent Conjugal Relationships', Law and Society Review, 25: 313-34.
8. GARDNER, C. B. (1990), 'Safe Conduct: Women, Crime, and Self in Public Places', Social Problems, 37: 311-28.
9. GARLAND, D. (2001), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Control in Contemporary Society. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford Press.
10. GLASER, B. and STRAUSS, A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
11. GOODKIND, J. R., SULLIVAN, C. M. and BYBEE, D. I. (2004), 'A Contextual Analysis of Battered Women's Safety Planning', Violence Against Women, 10: 514-33.
12. GUBRIUM, J. F. and HOLSTEIN, J. A. (2003), 'Analyzing Interpretive Practice', in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, eds, Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 2nd edn, 214-48. London: Sage.
13. HARRELL, A. and SMITH, B. E. (1996), 'Effects of Restraining Orders on Domestic Violence Victims', in E. S. Buzawa and C. G. Buzawa, eds, Do Arrests and Restraining Orders Work?, 214-42. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. HART, B. (1993), 'Battered Women and the Criminal Justice System', American Behavioral Scientist, 36: 624-38.
15. HUGHES, H. M., HUMPHREY, N. N. and WEAVER, T. L. (2005), 'Advances in Violence and Trauma: Toward Comprehensive Ecological Models', Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20: 31-8.
16. HUTCHISON, I. W. and HIRSCHEL, J. (1998), 'Abused Women: Help-Seeking Strategies and Police Utilization', Violence Against Women, 4: 436-56.
17. IBARRA, P. R. (2005), 'Red Flags and Trigger Control: The Role of Human Supervision in an Electronic Monitoring Program', Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 6: 31-48.
18. IBARRA, P. R. and EREZ, E. (2005), 'Victim-centric Diversion? The Electronic Monitoring of Domestic Violence Cases', Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23(2): 259-276.
19. JONES, R. (2000), 'Digital Rule: Punishment, Control and Technology', Punishment and Society, 2: 5-22.
20. KANUHA, V. K. and ROSS, M. L. (2004), 'The Use of Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) as a Strategy to Address Intimate Partner Violence', Violence and Victims, 19: 343-56.
21. KARSTEDT, S. (2002), 'Emotions and Criminal Justice', Theoretical Criminology, 6: 299-317.
22. LASTER, K. and O'MALLEY, P. (1996), 'Sensitive New-Age Laws: The Reassertion of Emotionality in Law', International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 24: 21-40.
23. LOSEKE, D. R. (1992), The Battered Woman and Shelters: The Social Construction of Wife Abuse. New York: State University of New York Press.
24. MAHONEY, M. R. (1991), 'Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation', Michigan Law Review, 90: 1-94.
25. MARX, G. T. (2002), 'What's New about the "New Surveillance"? Classifying for Change and Continuity', Surveillance and Society, 1: 9-29.
26. MERRY, S. E. (2003), 'Rights Talk and the Experience of Law: Implementing Women's Human Rights to Protection from Violence', Human Rights Quarterly, 25: 343-81.
27. PLECK, E. (1987), Domestic Tyranny: The Making of American Social Policy against Family Violence from Colonial Times to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. RIGER, S., RAJA, S. and CAMACHO, J. (2002), 'The Radiating Impact of Intimate Partner Violence', Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17: 184-205.
29. SCHNEIDER, E. M. (2000) Battered Women and Feminist Lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. SHERMAN, L. W. (2003), 'Reason for Emotion: Reinventing Justice with Theories Innovations and Research', Criminology, 41: 1-37.
31. STANKO, E. A. (1990), Everyday Violence. London: Pandora Press.
32. TIERNEY, K.J. (1982), 'The Battered Women Movement and the Creation of Wife Beating Problem', Social Problems, 29: 297-323.
33. TUTTY, L. M., WEAVER, G. and ROTHERY, M. A. (1999), 'Residents' Views of the Efficacy of Shelter Services for Assaulted Women', Violence Against Women, 5: 898-925.
34. WARR, M. and ELLISON, C. G. (2000), 'Rethinking Social Reactions to Crime: Personal and Altruistic Fear in Family Households', American Sociological Review, 106: 551-78.