Victim-centric diversion? The electronic monitoring of domestic violence cases

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 259-276

  Ibarra, Peter R ^a   Erez, Edna ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DETENTION; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; ELECTRONIC MONITORING; ELECTRONICS; HUMAN; MONITORING; OFFENDER; RECIDIVISM; SOCIAL CONTROL; TECHNOLOGY;

ADULT; CRIME VICTIMS; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDICIAL ROLE; MALE; OHIO; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRISONERS; PRISONS; RECURRENCE; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SECURITY MEASURES; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL; SPOUSE ABUSE;

EID: 17644423130     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.639     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Austin, J., & Krisberg, B. (1981). Wider, stronger, and different nets: The dialectics of criminal justice reform. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18, 165-196.
2. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
3. Black, M., & Smith, R. G. (2003). Electronic monitoring in the criminal justice system. Trends and Issues, 254. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.
4. Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Do arrests and restraining orders work? Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Cambridge: Polity.
6. Crowe, A. H., Sydney, L., Bancroft, P., & Lawrence, B. (2002). Offender supervision with electronic technology. Lexington, KY: American Probation and Parole Association.
7. Decker, S. H. (1985). A systemic analysis of diversion: Net widening and beyond. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13, 207-216.
8. Emerson, R., & Messinger, S. (1977). The micro-politics of trouble. Social Problems, 25, 121-134.
9. Erez, E., & Belknap, J. (1998a). Battered women and the criminal justice system: The perspectives of service providers. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 6, 37-87.
10. Erez, E., & Belknap, J. (1998b). In their own words: Battered women's assessment of the criminal processing system's responses. Violence and Victims, 13, 251-268.
11. Erez, E., Ibarra, P. R., & Lurie, N. A. (2004). Applying electronic monitoring to domestic violence cases: A comparison of two bilateral programs. Federal Probation, 68, 15-20.
12. Erez, E., Ibarra, P. R., & Lurie, N. A. (forthcoming). An evaluation of electronic monitoring of domestic violence cases through radio frequency-based technologies. A report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.
13. Fagan, J. (1995). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. NIJ Research Report. Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://www.ncjrs. org/txtfiles/crimdom.txt.
14. Fischer, K., & Rose, M. (1995). When 'enough is enough': Battered women's decision making around court orders of protection. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 414-429.
15. Harrell, A. (1993). Court processing and the effects of restraining orders for domestic violence victims: Final report to the State Justice Institute. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
16. Harrell, A., & Smith, B. E. (1996). Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In E. Buzawa (Ed.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 214-242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Holt, V. L., Kernic, M. A., Lumley, T., Wolf, M. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2002). Civil protection orders and risk of subsequent police-reported violence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 589-594.
18. Holt, V. L., Kernic, M. A., Wolf, M. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24, 16-21.
19. Hudson, B. (2002). Restorative justice and gendered violence: Diversion or effective justice? British Journal of Criminology, 42, 616-634.
20. Ibarra, P. R. (2005). Red flags and trigger control: The role of human supervision in an electronic monitoring program. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 6, 31-48.
21. Kitsuse, J. I. (1962). Societal reaction to deviance: Problems of theory and method. Social Problems, 9, 247-256.
22. Koss, M. P. (2000). Blame, shame, and community: Justice responses to violence against women. American Psychologist, 55, 1332-1343.
23. Lemert, E. (1967). Human Deviance, Social Problems, and Social Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Mahoney, M. R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1-94.
25. McMahon, M. (1990). "Net widening": Vagaries in the use of a concept. British Journal of Criminology, 30, 121-149.
26. Palmer, T. (1979). Juvenile diversion: When and for whom? California Youth Authority Quarterly, 32, 14-20.
27. Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 149-163.
28. Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic tyranny: The making of American social policy against family violence from colonial times to the present. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Sanders, A. (1988). The limits to diversion from prosecution. British Journal of Criminology, 28, 513-532.
30. Thomas, B. (2003). Diverting aboriginal adults from the criminal justice system, some background and issues for consideration. Aboriginal Justice Advisory Committee. Retrieved April 16, 2004, from http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov. au/ajac.nsf/pages/discussionpapers.
31. Vollum, S., & Hale, C. (2002). Electronic monitoring: A research review. Corrections Compendium, 27, 1-26.
32. Weise-Pengelly, C. A., & Dammer, H. R. (2002). Diversion programs. In D. Levinson (Ed.), The encyclopedia of crime and punishment (pp. 533-536). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33. Worden, P. A. (2000). The changing boundaries of the criminal justice system: Redefining the problem and the response in domestic violence. In C. M. Friel (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Boundary changes in criminal justice organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 215-266). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.