Stereo and motion parallax cues in human 3D vision: Can they vanish without a trace?

Journal of Vision

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1471-1485

  Rauschecker, Andreas M ^a   Solomon, Samuel G ^b   Glennerster, Andrew ^c,d  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feedback; Parallax; Size constancy; Stereopsis; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCEPTION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33845797506     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/6.12.12     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams, W. J., Banks, M. S., & van Ee, R. (2001). Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1063-1064. [PubMed] [Article]
2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
3. Atkins, J. E., Fiser, J., & Jacobs, R. A. (2001). Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts. Vision Research, 41, 449-461. [PubMed]
4. Backus, B. T. (2002). Perceptual metamers in stereoscopic vision. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Neural information processing systems (14th ed., pp. 1223-1230). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
5. Backus, B. T., Fleet, D. J., Parker, A. J., & Heeger, D. J. (2001). Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2054-2068. [PubMed] [Article]
6. Bradshaw, M. F., Parton, A. D., & Glennerster, A. (2000). The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information. Vision Research, 40, 3725-3734. [PubMed]
7. Buckley, D., & Frisby, J. P. (1993). Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges. Vision Research, 33, 919-933. [PubMed]
8. Cornsweet, T. N. (1962). The staircase-method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 485-491. [PubMed]
9. Finney, D. (1971). Probit analysis (3rd ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
10. Glennerster, A., Rogers, B. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (1996). Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task. Vision Research, 36, 3441-3456. [PubMed]
11. Glennerster, A., Tcheang, L., Gilson, S. J., Fitzgibbon, A. W., & Parker, A. J. (2006). Humans ignore motion and stereo cues in favor of a fictional stable world. Current Biology, 16, 428-432. [PubMed]
12. Hillis, J. M., Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., & Landy, M. S. (2002). Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science, 298, 1627-1630. [PubMed]
13. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12), 967-992, http://journalofvision.org/4/12/1/, doi:10.1167/ 4.12.1. [PubMed] [Article]
14. Jacobs, R. A. (2002). What determines visual cue reliability? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 345-350. [PubMed]
15. Johnston, E. B., Cumming, B. G., & Landy, M. S. (1994). Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues. Vision Research, 34, 2259-2275. [PubMed]
16. Johnston, E. B., Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J. (1993). Integration of depth modules: Stereopsis and texture. Vision Research, 33, 813-826. [PubMed]
17. Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research, 43, 2539-2558. [PubMed]
18. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young,M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412. [PubMed]
19. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(Suppl. 2), 467. [PubMed]
20. McKee, S. P., Levi, D. M., & Bowne, S. F. (1990). The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Research, 30, 1763-1779. [PubMed]
21. Ooi, T. L., Wu, B., & He, Z. J. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414, 197-200. [PubMed]
22. Richards, W. (1985). Structure from stereo and motion. Journal of the Optical Society America A, 2, 343-349. [PubMed]
23. Taylor, M. M. (1962). Figural after-effects: A psychophysical theory of the displacement effect. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 247-277. [PubMed]
24. Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 663-678. [PubMed]
25. Triesch, J., Ballard, D. H., & Jacobs, R. A. (2002). Fast temporal dynamics of visual cue integration. Perception, 31, 421-434. [PubMed]
26. Young, M. J., Landy, M. S., & Maloney, L. T. (1993). A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Research, 33, 2685-2696. [PubMed]