Definitions for haemophilia prophylaxis and its outcomes: The Canadian consensus study

Haemophilia

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 12-20

  Ota, S ^b   McLimont, M ^b   Carcao, M D ^a,b   Blanchette, V S ^a,b   Graham, N ^c   Paradis, E ^d   Feldman, Brian M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^c The Hospital for Sick Children ^*  (Canada)

^d Canadian Association of Nurses in Hemophilia Care   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bleed types; Definitions; Delphi Approach; Haemophilia; Survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANADA; CONSENSUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MUCOSAL BLEEDING; NOMENCLATURE; NURSE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SECONDARY PREVENTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CANADA; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; HEMATOLOGY; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; NURSES; PHYSICIANS; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 33845792064     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01409.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Feldman BM, Rivard G, Israels S, Robinson S et al. Final results from the Canadian hemophilia dose escalation prophylaxis trial. International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Birmingham, UK. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1: OC219.
2. Cabral D, Katz JN, Weinblatt ME, Ting G, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Development and assessment of indicators of rheumatoid arthritis severity: Results of a Delphi Panel. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 61-6.
3. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000; 32: 1008-15.
4. Powell Kennedy H. Enhancing Delphi research: Methods and results. J Adv Nurs 2004; 45: 504-11.
5. McKenna HP. The Delphi technique: A worthwhile research approach for nursing ? J Adv Nurs 1994; 19: 1221-5.
6. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 2001; 38: 195-200.
7. Van der Sanden WJM, Plasschaert AJM, Grol RPTM, Verdonschot EH. Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Evaluation of two methods. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70: 301a-1h.
8. Löfmark A, Thorell-Ekstrand I. An assessment form for clinical nursing education: A Delphi study. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48: 291-8.
9. Graham B, Regehr G, Wright JG. Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 1150-6.
10. McMurray A. Three decision-making aids: Brainstorming, nominal group, and Delphi technique. J Nurs Staff Dev 1994; 10: 62-5.
11. Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, 2000.
12. Ljung R. Second Workshop of the European Paediatric Network for Haemophilia Management, 17-19 September 1998 in Vitznau/Switzerland. Haemophilia 1999; 5: 286-91.
13. Donadel-Claeyssens on behalf of the European Network for Haemophilia Management. Current co-ordinated activities of the PEDNET (European Paediatric Network for Haemophilia Management). Haemophilia 2006; 12: 124-7.
14. Berntorp E, Astermark J, Bjorkman S et al. Consensus perspectives on prophylactic therapy for haemophilia: Summary statement. Haemophilia 2003; 9: 1-4.
15. US Department of Health and Human Services. Report on the Universal Data Collection Program. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000.
16. Blanchette VS, McCready M, Achonu C, Abdolell M, Rivard G, Manco-Johnson MJ. A survey of factor prophylaxis in boys with haemophilia followed in North American haemophilia treatment centres. Haemophilia 2003; 9: 19-26.
17. Dunn AL, Busch MT, Bradley-Wyly J, Sullivan KM, Abshire TC. Arthroscopic synovectomy for hemophilic joint disease in a pediatric population. J Pediatr Orthop 2004; 24: 414-26.
18. Kern M, Blanchette V, Stain AM, Einarson TR, Feldman BM. Clinical and cost implications of target joints in Canadian boys with severe hemophilia A. J Pediatr 2004; 145: 628-4.
19. Liesner RJ, Khair K, Hann IM. The impact of prophylactic treatment on children with severe haemophilia. Br J Haematol 1996; 92: 973-8.