Development of clinical practice guidelines: Evaluation of 2 methods

Journal of the Canadian Dental Association

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2004, Pages

  Van Der Sanden, Wil J M ^a   Mettes, Dirk G ^a   Plasschaert, Alphons J M ^a   Grol, Richard P T M ^a   Verdonschot, Emiel H ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dental care standards; Evaluation studies; Evidence based medicine; Practice guidelines standards

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; DELPHI STUDY; DENTAL CARE; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERT WITNESS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; TOOTH DISEASE;

CONSENSUS; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DENTAL CARE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; EXPERT TESTIMONY; HUMANS; MOLAR, THIRD; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; TOOTH, IMPACTED;

EID: 4043125898     PISSN: 14882159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Burgers JS. Quality of clinical guidelines. Thesis. Nijmegen: Ponsen & Looijen BV, Wageningen; 2002.
2. Institute of Medicine. Field MJ, Lohr KN (eds.) Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
3. Grol R, Thomas S, Roberts R. Development and implementation of guidelines for family practice: lessons from the Netherlands. J Fam Pract 1995; 40(5):435-9.
4. van der Sanden WJ, Mettes DG, Grol RP, Plasschaert AJ, Verdonschot EH. Development of clinical practice guidelines for dentists: methods for topic selection. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002; 30(4):313-9.
5. van der Sanden WJ, Mettes DG, Plasschaert AJ, van't Hof MA, Grol RP, Verdonschot EH. Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: opinions of dental practitioners on their contribution to the quality of dental care. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12(2):107-11.
6. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles SH, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318(7183):593-6.
7. Sutherland SE, Matthews DC, Fendrich P. Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: Part I. Navigating new waters. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67(7):379-83.
8. Sutherland SE, Matthews DC, Fendrich P. Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: Part II. By dentists, for dentists. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67(8):448-52.
9. Steffensen FH, Sorensen HT, Olesen F. Impact of local evidence-based clinical guidelines - a Danish intervention study. Fam Pract 1997; 14(3):209-15.
10. Lomas J. Making clinical policy explicit. Legislative policy making and lessons for developing practice guidelines. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1993; 9(1):11-25.
11. van der Sanden WJM, Mettes DG, Plasschaert AJ, Grol RP, van't Hof MA, Knutsson K, and other. Effect of selected literature on dentists' decisions to remove asymptomatic, impacted lower third molars. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110(1):2-7.
12. Knutsson K. The mandibular third molar. Thesis. Malmö: Lund University; 1996.
13. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CFB, Askham J, and other. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2(3):i-iv, 1-88.
14. McDonnell J, Meijler A, Kahan JP, Bernstein SJ, Rigter H. Panellist consistency in the assessment of medical appropriateness. Health Policy 1996; 37(3):139-52.
15. Eccles M, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, Adams PC, Higgins B, Purves I, and other. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development. BMJ 1996; 312(7033):760-2.
16. Duffield C. The Delphi technique: a comparison of results obtained using 2 expert panels. Int J Nurs Stud 1993; 30(3):227-37.
17. Leape LL, Park RE, Kahan JP, Brook RH. Group judgements of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Qual Assur Health Care 1992; 4(2):151-9.
18. Coulter ID, Marcus M, Freed JR. Consistency across panels of ratings of appropriateness of dental care treatment procedures. Comm Dent Health 1998; 15(2):97-104.
19. Jones J, Hunter D. Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311(7001):376-80.
20. Meijler AP, McDonnell J, Rigter H. [Assessment of indications using the RAND method: invasive therapy in coronary sclerosis as an example]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1994; 138(1):22-28. Dutch.
21. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialist societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000; 355(9198):103-6.
22. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2000). NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance No. 8. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Available from URL: www.nice.org.uk/Docref.asp?d=114978.
23. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of unerupted and impacted third molar teeth. Publication number 43. Edinburgh: SIGN; 1999.
24. Sutherland S. Systematic reviews and guidelines in dentistry: lessons learned. JADA 2004; in press.
25. Shaw W. The Cochrane Collaboration: Oral Health Group. Br Dent J 1994; 177(8):272-3.
26. Mettes TG, van der Sanden WJM, Nienhuijs M, Verdonschot EH, Plasschaert AJM, van't Hof MA. Interventions for treating trouble-free impacted wisdom teeth in adults (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.
27. Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Caplan, RA, Arens, JF. The development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Integrating medical science and practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16(4):1003-12.