Tutorial: Industrial split-plot experiments

Quality Engineering

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-15

  Kowalski, Scott M ^a   Parker, Peter A ^b   Vining, G Geoffrey ^c  

^a Minitab Inc   (United States)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design of experiments; Response surface methodology; Split plot experiments

Indexed keywords

OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY CONTROL;

INDUSTRIAL EXPERIMENTS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SPLIT-PLOT EXPERIMENTS;

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 33845725178     PISSN: 08982112     EISSN: 15324222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08982110601057179     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bingham, D., Sitter, R. S. (1999). Minimum-Aberration two-level fractional factorial split-plot designs. Technometrics, 41:62-70. [CSA]
2. Bingham, D., Sitter, R. S. (2001). Design issues in fractional factorial split-plot experiments. Journal of Quality Technology, 33:2-15. [CSA]
3. q-r split-plot experiments. Journal of Quality Technology, 32:39-56. [CSA]
4. Bisgaard, S., Kulahci, M. (2001). Robust product design: Saving trials with split-plot confounding. Quality Engineering, 13:525-530. [CSA]
5. Box, G. E. P., Behnken, D. W. (1960). Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 2:455-475. [CSA][CROSSREF]
6. Box, G. E. P., Jones, S. (1992). Split-Plot designs for robust product experimentation. Journal of Applied Statistics, 19:3-26.[CSA]
7. Box, G. E. P., Jones, S. (2001). Split-Plots for robust product and process experimentation. Quality Engineering, 13:127-134. [CSA]
8. Cornell, J. A. (1988). Analyzing data from mixture experiments containing process variables: A split-plot approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 20:2-23. [CSA]
9. Huang, P., Chen, D., Voelkel, J. O. (1998). Minimum-Aberration two-level split-plot designs. Technometrics, 40:314-326. [CSA][CROSSREF]
10. Kowalski, S. M. (2002). 24 run split-plot experiments for robust parameter design. Journal of Quality Technology, 34:399-410. [CSA]
11. Kowalski, S. M., Cornell, J. A., Vining, G. G. (2002). Split-Plot designs and estimation methods for mixture experiments with process variables. Technometrics, 44:72-79. [CSA][CROSSREF]
12. Kowalski, S. M., Potcner, K. J. (2003). How to recognize a split-plot experiment. Quality Progress, 36(11):60-66. [CSA]
13. Montgomery, D. C. (2004). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Parker, P. A., Kowalski, S. M., Vining, G. G. (2006a). Classes of split-plot response surface designs for equivalent estimation. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22:291-305. [CSA][CROSSREF]
15. Parker, P. A., Kowalski, S. M., Vining, G. G. (2006b). Construction of balanced equivalent estimation second-order split-plot designs. Submitted for publication.[CSA]
16. Payne, F. M., Wyatt, G. W., Bogue, D. R., Stoner, R. C. (2000). High Reynolds number studies of a Boeing 777-200 high lift configuration in the NASA ARC 12 foot pressure tunnel and NASA LaRC National Transonic Facility. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA 2000-4220, Denver, CO.
17. Potcner, K. J., Kowalski, S. M. (2004). How to analyze a split-plot experiment. Quality Progress, 37(11):67-74. [CSA]
18. Simpson, J. R., Kowalski, S. M., Landman, D. (2004). Experimentation with randomization restrictions: Targeting practical implementation. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 20(5):481-495. [CSA][CROSSREF]
19. Vining, G. G., Kowalski, S. M. (2006). Exact inference for response surface designs within a split-plot structure. Submitted for publication.[CSA]
20. Vining, G. G., Kowalski, S. M., Montgomery, D. C. (2005). Response surface designs within a split-plot structure. Journal of Quality Technology, 37:115-129. [CSA]