Rehabilitation students' attitudes toward persons with disabilities in high- and low-stakes social contexts: A conjoint analysis

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 28, Issue 24, 2006, Pages 1517-1527

  Rosenthal, David A ^a   Chan, Fong ^a   Livneh, Hanoch ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude change; Conjoint analysis; Perceptions of disability types; Prevailing societal attitudes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO DISABILITY; DECISION MAKING; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PARAMEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CARE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ATTITUDE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STUDENT ATTITUDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STUDENTS, HEALTH OCCUPATIONS;

EID: 33845708196     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280600646102     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Brodwin, M and Orange, L.(2002) Attitudes toward disability. In Rehabilitation services: An introduction for the human service professional. (pp. 174-197). Osage Beach MO: Aspen Professional Services.
2. Cook, D. (1998) Psychosocial impact of disability. In Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond 3rd ed. (pp. 303-326). Austin TX: Pro-Ed.
3. Livneh, H and Antonak, R. (1997) Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability. Gaithersburg MD: Aspen.
4. Siller, J.(1976) Attitudes toward disability. In Contemporary vocational rehabilitation. (pp. 67-79). New York: New York University Press.
5. Smart, J. (2002) Disability, society, and the individual. Austin TX: Pro-Ed.
6. Chubon, R. (1982) An analysis of research dealing with attitudes of professionals toward disability J Rehab, 48(1), pp. 25-30.
7. Benham, P. (1988) Attitudes of occupational therapy personnel toward persons with disabilities Am J Occupat Ther, 42, pp. 305-311.
8. Estes, J and Deyer, C and Hansen, R and Russell, J. (1991) Influence of occupational therapy curricula on students' attitudes toward persons with disabilities Am J Occup Ther., 45(2), pp. 156-158.
9. Altman, B. (1981) Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction Social Problems, 28, pp. 321-337.
10. Antonak, R and Livneh, H. (1988) The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities: Methods, psychometric and scales. Springfield IL: Charles C Thomas.
11. Paris, M. (1993) Attitudes of medical students and health-care professionals toward people with disabilities Arch Phys Med Rehab, 74, pp. 818-825.
12. Garske, G and Thomas, K. (1990) The relationship of self-esteem and contact to attitudes of students in rehabilitation counseling toward people with disabilities Rehab Counsel Bull, 34, pp. 67-71.
13. Hunt, B and Hunt, C. (2000) Attitudes toward people with disabilities: A comparison of undergraduate rehabilitation and business major Rehab Educ, 14(3), pp. 269-283.
14. Chan, C and Lee, T and Yuen, H and Chan, F. (2002) Attitudes towards people with disabilities between Chinese rehabilitation and business students: An implication for practice Rehab Psychol, 47, pp. 324-338.
15. Rosenthal, D and Berven, N. (1999) Effects of client race on clinical judgment Rehab Counsel Bull, 42, pp. 243-265.
16. Rosenthal, D. (2004) The effects of client race on clinical judgment of practicing vocational rehabilitation counselors Rehab Counsel Bull, 47(3), pp. 131-141.
17. Strohmer, D and Leierer, S. (2000) Modeling rehabilitation counselor clinical judgment Rehab Counsel Bull, 44, pp. 3-11.
18. Spengler, P and Strohmer, D and Prout, H. (1990) Testing the robustness of the diagnostic overshadowing bias Am J Mental Retardation, 95, pp. 204-214.
19. Strohmer, D and Shivy, V. (1994) Bias in counselor hypothesis testing: Testing the robustness of counselor confirmatory bias J Counsel Develop, 73, pp. 191-198.
20. Rahimi, M and Rosenthal, D and Chan, F. (2003) Effect of race on clinical judgment of African American undergraduate students in rehabilitation Rehab Counsel Bull, 46, pp. 157-163.
21. Grand, S and Bernier, J and Strohmer, D. (1982) Attitudes toward disabled persons as functions of social context and specific disability Rehab Psychol, 27, pp. 165-174.
22. Wright, B.(1988) Attitudes and the fundamental negative bias: Conditions and corrections. In Attitudes toward people with disabilities. (pp. 3-21). New York: Springer.
23. Dooley, D and Gliner, J. (1989) Perception of disability labels: Effect of attitude and stimulus presentation Rehab Psychol, 34, pp. 259-270.
24. Schmelkin, L. (1985) Dimensionality of disability labels Rehab Psychol, 30, pp. 221-233.
25. Abroms, K and Kodera, T. (1979) Acceptance hierarchy of handicaps: Validation of Kirk's statement, "Special education begins where medicine stops" J Learning Disab, 12, pp. 24-29.
26. Chan, F and Wang, M and Thomas, K and Wong, D and Chan, C and Lee, G and Lui, K. (2002) Conjoint analysis in rehabilitation counseling research Rehab Educ., 16, pp. 179-195.
27. Livneh, H and Antonak, R. (1994) Indirect methods of attitude measurement: Reply to Linkowski and Yuker Rehab Educ, 8, pp. 144-148.
28. Wang, M and Thomas, K and Chan, F and Cheing, G. (2003) A conjoint analysis of factors influencing American and Taiwanese college students' preferences for people with disabilities Rehab Psychol, 48, pp. 195-201.
29. American Marketing Association. (1992) Conjoint analysis: A guide for designing and interpreting conjoint studies. Chicago: Author.
30. Tsang, H and Chan, C and Chan, F. (2001) Conjoint analysis: An alternative approach to studying stigma Transcult Psychiat, 38(1), pp. 136-139.
31. Shamir, M and Shamir, J. (1995) Competing values in public opinion: A conjoint analysis Political Behavior, 17, pp. 107-133.
32. Tsang, H and Chan, F and Chan, C. (2004) Attitudes of occupational therapy students toward placement of treatment facilities in the community: A conjoint analysis Am J Occupat Ther, 58, pp. 426-434.
33. Wong, D and Chan, F and Cardoso, E and Lam, C and Miller, S. (2004) Rehabilitation counseling students' attitudes toward people with disabilities in three social contexts: A conjoint analysis Rehab Counsel Bull, 47, pp. 194-204.
34. Corrigan, P and River, L and Lundin, R and Wasowski, K and Campion, J and Mathisen, J. (2000) Stigmatizing attributions about mental illness J Comm Psychol, 28, pp. 91-102.
35. Green, P and Srinivasan, V. (1978) Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook J Consumer Res, 5, pp. 103-123.
36. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). (1997) SPSS Conjoint 8.0. Chicago: Author.
37. Louviere, J. (1988) Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis series-quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
38. Hammond, K and McClelland, G and Mumpower, J. (1980) Human judgment and decision making. New York: Praeger Publishers.
39. Wilkie, W and Pessemier, E. (1973) Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute attitude models J Marketing Res, 10, pp. 428-441.
40. Gilfoyle, E and Gliner, J. (1985) Attitudes toward handicapped children: Impact of an educational program Phys Occupat Ther Pediatrics, 5, pp. 27-41.
41. Gottlieb, J and Gottlieb, B. (1977) Stereotypic attitudes and behavioral intentions toward handicapped children Am J Mentally Deficient, 82, pp. 65-71.
42. Richardson, S and Ronald, L. (1977) The effect of a physically handicapped interviewer on children's expression of values toward handicap Rehab Psychol, 24, pp. 211-218.
43. Voeltz, L. (1980) Children's attitudes toward the amputee child Am J Mentally Deficient, 84, pp. 455-464.
44. Schwarzer, R and Weiner, B. (1991) Stigma controllability and coping as predictors of emotions and social support J Soc Personal Relationships, 8, pp. 133-140.
45. Weiner, B and Perry, R and Magnusson, J. (1998) An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas J Personality Soc Psychol, 55, pp. 738-748.
46. Siller, J and Ferguson, L and Vann, D and Holland, B.(1967) Studies in reactions to disability. In Structure of attitudes toward the physically disabled. New York: New York University, School of Education.
47. See, J and Kamnetz, B.(2004) Person-centered counseling in rehabilitation professions. In Counseling theories and techniques for rehabilitation health professionals. (pp. 76-97). New York: Springer.
48. Thomas, K and Thoreson, R and Parker, R and Buttler, A.(1998) Theoretical foundations of the counseling function. In Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond 3rd ed. (pp. 225-268). Austin TX: Pro-Ed.
49. Wood, W. (2000) Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence Ann Rev Psychol, 51, pp. 539-570.