Hybridization and reproductive isolation among syntopic populations of the topminnows Fundulus notatus and F. olivaceus

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 152-164

  Duvernell, D D ^a   Schaefer, J F ^b   Hancks, D C ^a   Fonoti, J A ^a   Ravanelli, A M ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

^b The University of Southern Mississippi   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytochrome b; Killifish; Microsatellite; Mitochondrial; Nuclear; SNP; Sympatry

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PRIMER DNA;

FISH; HYBRID ZONE; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; FUNDULIDAE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; REPRODUCTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; UNITED STATES;

ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CYPRINODONTIFORMES; FUNDULIDAE; FUNDULUS HETEROCLITUS; FUNDULUS NOTATUS; FUNDULUS OLIVACEUS;

EID: 33845703823     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01213.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adams, S.M., Oleksiak, M.F. & Duvernell, D.D. 2005. Microsatellite primers for the Atlantic coastal killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, with applicability to related Fundulus species. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5: 275-277.
2. Barton, N.H. & Gale, K.S. 1993. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R. G. Harrison, ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Beaumont, M.D., Barratt E.M., Gottelli D., Kitchener A.C., Daniels M.J., Pritchard J.K., & M.W., Bruford 2001. Genetic diversity and introgression in the Scottish wildcat. Mol. Ecol. 10: 319-336.
4. Belkhir, K. 1999. GENETIX V. 4.0. Laboratoire Genome, Population, Interactions, CNRS UPR 9060. Montpellier, France.
5. Black, A. & Howell W.M. 1978. A distinctive chromosomal race of the cyprinodontid fish, Fundulus notatus from the Upper Tombigbee River system of Alabama and Mississippi. Copeia 1978: 280-288.
6. Blanchard, T.A. 1996. Ovarian cycles and microhabitat use in two species of topminnows, Fundulus olivaceus and F. euryzonus, from the southeastern United States. Environ. Biol. Fishes 47: 155-163.
7. Braasch, M.E. & Smith P.W. 1965. Relationships of the topminnows Fundulus notatus and Fundulus olivaceus in the Upper Mississippi River Valley. Copeia 1965: 46-53.
8. Butlin, R.K. & Ritchie M.G. 1994. Behaviour and speciation. In: Behaviour and Evolution (P. J. B. Slater & T. R. Halliday, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Carney, S.E., Gardner K.A. & Rieseberg L.H. 2000. Evolutionary changes over the fifty-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus). Evolution 54: 462-474.
10. Chen, T.R. 1971. A comparative chromosome study of twenty killifish species of the genus Fundulus (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae). Chromosoma 32: 436-453.
11. Chiappero, M.B., Parise, C., Martí D.A., Bidau C.J. & Gardenal C.N. 2004. Distribution of genetic variability in populations of two chromosomal races of Dichroplus pratensis (Melanoplinae, Acrididae) and their hybrid zone. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 76-82.
12. Childs, M.R., Echelle A.A. & Dowling T.E. 1996. Development of the hybrid swarm between pecos pupfish (Cyprinodontidae, Cyprinodon pecosensis) and sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegates) - a perspective from allozymes and mtDNA. Evolution 50: 2014-2022.
13. Coyne, J.A. & Orr H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts.
14. Cuca, G.C. 1976. A comparative study of chromosomal and protein variation in two hybridizing fish species Fuldulus olivaceus and Fundulus notatus. Unpublished Thesis, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, IL, USA.
15. Dowling, T.E. & DeMarias B.D. 1993. Evolutionary significance of introgressive hybridization in cyprinid fishes. Nature. 362: 444-446.
16. Dowling, T.E. & Hoeh W.R. 1991. The extent of introgression outside the contact zone between Notropis cornutus and Notropis chrysocephalus (Teleostei:Cyprinidae). Evolution 45: 944-956.
17. Duvernell, D.D. & Aspinwall N. 1995. Introgression of Luxilus cornutus mtdna into allopatric populations of Luxilus chrysocephalus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in Missouri and Arkansas. Mol. Ecol. 4: 173-181.
18. Edmands, S., Feaman H.V., Harrison J.S. & Timmerman C.C. 2005. Genetic consequences of many generations of hybridization between divergent copepod populations. J. Heredity 96: 114-123.
19. Estoup, A., Jarne P. & Cornuet J.-M. 2002. Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis. Mol. Ecol. 11: 1591-1604.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap method. Evolution 9: 783-791.
21. Gorlov, I.P. & Tsurusaki N. 2000. Staggered clines in a hybrid zone between two chromosome races of the harvestman Gagrellopsis nodulifera (Arachnida: Opiliones). Evolution Ibid 54: 176-190.
22. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT, Version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statitics. J. Hered. 86: 485-486.
23. Harrison, R.G. & Rand D.M. 1989. Mosaic hybrid zones and the nature of species boundaries. In: Speciation and Its Consequences (J. Endler & D. Otte, eds) Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts.
24. Howell, W.M. & Black A. 1981. Karyotypes in populations of the cyprinodontid fishes of the Fundulus notatus Species complex: a geographic analysis. Bull. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist. 6: 19-30.
25. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics Appl. Note 17: 754-755.
26. Jiggins, C.D. & Mallet J. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 250-255.
27. Kumar, S., Tamura K. & Nei M. 2004. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief. Bioinfor. 5: 150-163.
28. Lee, D.S., Gilbert C.R., Hocutt C.H., Jenkins R.E., McAllister D.E. & Stauffer J.R. Jr 1980. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History. Raleigh, North Carolina.
29. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Muñoz-Muñoz, F., Sans-Fuentes M.A., López-Fuster M.J. & Ventura J. 2003. Non-metric morphological divergence in the western house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, from the Barcelona chromosomal hybrid zone. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 80: 313-322.
31. Palumbi, S.R., Martin A., Romano S., McMillan W.O., Stice L. & Grabowski G. 1991. The Simple Fools Guide to PCR. Special Publication Department Zoology, University of Honolulu. Honolulu, HI, USA.
32. Panithanarak, T., Hauffe H.C., Dallas J.F., Glover A., Ward R.G. & Searle J.B. 2004. Linkage-dependent gene flow in a house mouse chromosomal hybrid zone. Evolution 58: 184-192.
33. Petifils, L.E. 1986. Ecological Relationships among Members of the Fundulus notatus Species-Complex. M.S. Unpublished Thesis, Univ. New Orleans, LA, USA.
34. Pflieger, W.L. 1975. The Fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri.
35. Pritchard, J.K., Stephens M. & Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155: 945-959.
36. Raymond, M. & Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Heredity 86: 248-249.
37. Reed, K.M., Greenbaum I.F. & Sites J.W. 1995. Dynamics of a novel chromosomal polymorphism within a hybrid zone between two chromosme races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex (Sauria, Phynosomatidae). Evolution 49: 48-60.
38. Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution Ibid 43: 223-225.
39. Ross, S.T. 2001. Inland Fishes of Mississippi. Univ. Press of Mississippi., Jackson, Mississippi.
40. Seehausen, O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 198-207.
41. Setzer, P. 1970. An analysis of a natural hybrid swarm by means of chromosome morphology. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 99: 139-146.
42. She, J., Autern M., Kotoulas G., Pasteur N. & Bonhomme F. 1987. Multivariate analysis of genetic exchanges between Solea aegyptiaca and Solea senegalensis (Teleosts, Soleidae). Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 32: 357-371.
43. Smith, P.W. 2002. The Fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Champaign, Illinois.
44. Smithson, E.B. & Johnston C.E. 1999. Movement patterns of stream fishes in a Ouachita highlands stream: an examination of the restricted movement paradigm. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 128: 847-853.
45. Sokal, R.R. & Rolf J.F. 1994. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman Co., New York, New York.
46. Suttkus, R.D. & Cashner R.C. 1981. A new species of cyprinodontid fish, genus Fundulus (Zygonectes), from Lake Pontchartrain tributaries in Louisiana and Mississippi. Bull. Al. Mus. Nat. Hist. 6: 1-17.
47. Thomerson, J.E. 1966. A comparative biosystematic study of Fundulus notatus and Fundulus olivaceous (Pices: Cyprinodontidae). Tul. Stud. Zool. 13: 29-47.
48. Thomerson, J.E. & Wooldridge D.P. 1970. Food habits of allotopic and syntopic populations of the topminnows Fundulus olivaceus and Fundulus notatus. Am. Midl. Nat. 84: 573-576.
49. Turgeon, J. & Bernatchez L. 2001. Clinal variation at microsatellite loci reveals historical secondary intergradation between glacial races of Coregonus artedi (Teleostei: Coregoninae). Evolution 11: 2274-2286.
50. Wilson, C.C. & Bernatchez L. 1998. The ghost of hybrids past: fixation of arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) mitochondrial DNA in an introgressed population of lake trout (S. Namaycush). Mol. Ecol. 7: 127-132.