Multidisciplinary research ethics review: Is it feasible?

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 405-417

  Alderson, Priscilla ^a   Morrow, Virginia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845682960     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645570500435207     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Alderson, P. (1994) Spreading the Word on Research. London: CERES.
2. Alderson, P. (1998) Introduction: The importance of theories in healthcare and research. British Medical Journal, 317, 1007-10.
3. Alderson, P. & Morrow, V. (2004) Ethics, Social Research and Consulting with Children and Young People. Barkingside: Barnardo's.
4. ASA - Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and Commonwealth. (1999) Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice. Manchester: ASA.
5. Barnardo's. (nd) Statement of Ethical Research Practice. Barkingside: Barnardo's.
6. Bauman, Z. (1993) Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackman.
7. Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J. (2000) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. BERA - British Education Research Association. (2004) Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. Slough: BERA.
9. BMA - British Medical Association. (2001) Consent, Rights and Choices in Healthcare for Children and Young People. London: BMA.
10. Boulton, M., Brown, N., Lewis, G. & Webster, A. (2004) Implementing the ESRC Research Ethics Framework: The Case for Research Ethics Committees York: SATSU, University of York and School of Social Sciences and Law, & Oxford Brookes University.
11. BPA. (1992) reprinted, see RCPCH (2000).
12. BPS - British Psychological Society. (2004) A Code of Conduct for Psychologists. Leicester: BPS.
13. Brindle, D. (2005, 5 February) Opinion. Getting permission for social research is now a nightmare. The Guardian, p 5.
14. BSA - British Sociological Association. (2002) Guidelines for Good Professional Conduct and Statement of Ethical Practice; Statement of Ethical Practice. Durham: BSA.
15. Butler, I. (2002) Critical Commentary: A Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care Research. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 239-48.
16. Children in Scotland. (2002) Research/Consultation Guidelines. Edinburgh: CiS.
17. Cooter, R. (ed) (1992) In the Name of the Child: Health and Welfare 1880-1940. London: Routledge.
18. COREC. - Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (2005) Retrieved on 9 November, 2006, from http://www.corec.org.uk.
19. DH - Department of Health. (2001, revised 2003) Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. London: Department of Health.
20. DH - Department of Health. (2004) Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care; Implementation Plan for Social Care. London: Department of Health.
21. Doyal, L. (2004) The Ethical Governance and Regulation of Student Projects: a draft proposal. London: COREC.
22. Edwards, R. & Mauthner, M. (2002) Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop and T. Miller (eds.) Ethics in Qualitative Research (pp. 32-52). London: Sage.
23. ESRC. (2001) Research Ethics and Confidentiality. Swindon: ESRC.
24. Glendenning, C. & McKie, L. (2003) BSA working in partnership with SPA: ethics in social research. BSA Network, Summer, 15-16.
25. Grimshaw, J. (1986) Feminism and Philosophy. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
26. Hallowell, N., Lawton, J. & Gregory, S. (2005) Reflections on Research: the Realties of Doing Research in the Social Sciences. Buckingham: Open University Press.
27. Homan, R. (1992) The ethics of open methods. British Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 321-332.
28. ICMJE - International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2004) Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. Retrieved on 9 November, 2006 from www.icmje.org.
29. Iphofen, R. (2004, 16 January) A code to keep away judges, juries and MPs. The Times Higher, p. 24.
30. Jamrozik, K. (2004) Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost? British Medical Journal, 329, 286-7.
31. JUCSWEC - Joint University Council Social Work Education Committee. (2002) A Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care Research. London: JUCSWEC.
32. Kennedy, I. (2001). Learning from Bristol. Report of the Public Inquiry into Children's Heart Surgery 1984-1995. Cm5207. London: Stationery Office.
33. Lewis, G., Brown, N., Holland, S. & Webster, A. (2003) A Review of Ethics and Social Science Research for the Strategic Forum for the Social Sciences, Commissioned by the ESRC. Summary. York: SATSU, University of York.
34. Lewis, J. (2002) Research and Development in Social Care: Governance and Good Practice. Research Policy and Planning, 20(1), 3-9.
35. Lukes, S. (2005) Power: a Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
36. Lyon, E. (2002) Ethics revisited. BSA Network, October, 12-13.
37. MacIntyre, A. (1966) A Short History of Ethics. New York: Macmillan.
38. Mays, N. & Pope, C. (eds) (1996/2000) Qualitative Research in Healthcare. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
39. McNeill, P. (1993) The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Morrow, V. & McNeish, D. (2002) The ethics of listening to children: findings from a feasibility study for Barnardo's. Paper to Politics of Childhood Conference, Hull, 11 September.
41. MRC - Medical Research Council. (2004) MRC Ethics Guide: Medical Research Involving Children. London: MRC.
42. MRS - Market Research Society. (2004) Guidelines for Research among Children and Young People. London: MRS.
43. NCB - National Children's Bureau. (2003) Guidelines for Research. London: NBC.
44. NCH - National Children's Homes. (2001) Participating in Good Practice: a Resource Pack to Support User Participation in NCH Projects. London: NCH.
45. Nicholson, R. (1985) Medical Research with Children: Ethics, Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. NMC - Nursing & Midwifery Council. (2002) Code of Professional Conduct. London: NMC.
47. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (1999) The Ethics of Clinical Research in Developing Countries. London: Nuffield Foundation.
48. Nuffield Foundation. (2002) Ethical Review of Research Projects. London: Nuffield Foundation.
49. Nuremberg Code. (1947) Retrieved on 9 November, 2006, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohcp/references/nurecode.htm
50. Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2002) Code of Professional Conduct. London: NMC.
51. Proctor, R. (1988) Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Raphael, D. (1976) Problems of Politics and Philosophy. London: Macmillan.
53. RCPCH - Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. (1997) Withholding and Withdrawing. London: RCPCH.
54. RCPCH - Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. (2000) Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Medical Research Involving Children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 82, 177-182.
55. Sharav, V. (2003) Children in clinical research: a conflict of moral values. American Journal of Bioethics, 3(1), 1-99.
56. Smyth, M. & Williamson, E. (2005) Researchers and their 'subjects'. Bristol: Policy Press.
57. SRA - Social Research Association. (2002) Ethical Guidelines. London: SRA.
58. Sylvester, S. & Green, J. (2003) An excess of governance? Social Research and Local Research Ethics Committees. Medical Sociology News, 29(3), 39-44.
59. Tinker, A. & Coomber, V. (2004) University Research Ethics Committees: their role, remit and conduct. London: Kings College London.
60. Tobias, J. & Souhami, R. (1993) Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel. British Medical Journal, 307, 1199-2001.
61. US National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Medical and Behavioral Research. (1977) Research Involving Children: Report and Recommendations. Washington DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 77-0004.
62. US National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Medical and Behavioral Research. (1978) The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
63. Wald, D. (2004) Bureaucracy of ethics applications. British Medical Journal, 329, 282-5.
64. Ward, H, Cousens, N., Smith-Bathgate, B., Leitch, M., Everington, D., Will, R. & Smith, P. (2004) Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population. British Medical Journal, 329, 277-9.
65. Webster, A., Lewis, G., Brown, N. & Boulton, M. (2004) Developing a Framework for Social Science Research Ethics: Project Update for ESRC. York: SATSU, University of York and School of Social Sciences and Law, & Oxford Brookes University.
66. West, E. & Butler, J. (2003) An applied and qualitative LREC reflects on its practice. Bulletin of Medical Ethics, 185, 13-20.
67. WMA - World Medical Association. (2000/ 1964) Declaration of Helsinki. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA.