Using visual cues of contact to improve interactive manipulation of virtual objects in industrial assembly/maintenance simulations

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1013-1020

  Sreng, Jean ^a   Lécuyer, Anatole ^a   Mégard, Christine ^b   Andriot, Claude ^b  

^a CAMPUS DE BEAULIEU   (France)

^b CEA LSI   (France)

Author keywords

Assembly maintenance simulation; Contact; Force; Glyph; Light; Proximity; Virtual prototyping; Visual cues

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY/MAINTENANCE SIMULATION; GLYPH; VIRTUAL PROTOTYPING; VISUAL CUES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 33845674936     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2006.189     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. 3D connexion, http://www.3dconnexion.com.
2. VTK. http://www.vtk.org.
3. P. Baudisch, D. DeCarlo, A. Duchowski, and W. Geilser. Focusing on the essential: Considering attention in display design. Communications of the ACM, 46(3):60-66, mar 2003.
4. M. Bergamasco. The glad-in-art project. In Proceedings of IMAGINA Conference, 1992.
5. E. Chen. Six degree-of-freedom haptic system for desktop virtual prototyping applications. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Virtual Reality and Prototyping, pages 97-106, 1999.
6. G. W. Edwards. Performance and usability of force feedback and auditory substitutions in a virtual environment manipulation task. Master's thesis, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute, nov 2000.
7. A. Gomes de Sa and G. Zachmann. Virtual reality as a tool for verification of assembly and maintenance processes. Computers & Graphics, 23(3):389 403, 1999.
8. H. H. Hu, A. A. Gooch, W. B. Thompson, B. E. Smits, J. J. Rieser, and P. Shirley. Visual cues for imminent object contact in realistic virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization Conference, pages 179-185, 2000.
9. D. E. Johnson and P. Willemsen. Six degree-of-freedom haptic rendering of complex polygonal models. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, page 229, 2003.
10. M. Kitagawa, D. Dokko, A. M. Okamura, B. T. Bethea, and D. D. Yuh. Effect of sensory substitution on suture manipulation forces for surgical teleoperation. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Medicine Meets Virtual Reality Conference, jan 2004.
11. Y. Kitamura, A. Yee, and F. Kishino. A sophisticated manipulation aid in a virtual environment using dynamic constraints among object faces. Presence, 7(5):460 477, oct 1998.
12. L. Kjelldahl and M. Prime. A study on how depth perception is affected by different presentation methods of 3d objects on a 2d display. Computers & Graphics, 19(2):199-202, apr 1995.
13. A. Lécuyer, S. Coquillart, and A. Kheddar. Pseudo-haptic feedback: Can isometric input devices simulate force feedback ? In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, pages 83-90, 2000.
14. A. Lécuyer, A. Kheddar, S. Coquillart, L. Graux, and P. Coiffet. A haptic prototype for the simulations of aeronautics mounting/unmounting operations. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot-Human Interactive Communication, 2001.
15. A. Lécuyer, C. Mégard, J.-M. Burkhardt, T. Lim, S. Coquillart, P. Coiffet, and L. Graux. The effect of haptic, visual and auditory feedback on an insertion task on a 2-screen workbench. In Proceedings of the Immersive Projection Technology Symposium, 2002.
16. R. W. Lindeman. Virtual contact: The continuum from purely visual to purely physical. In Proceedings of the 47th annual meeting of the human factor and ergonomics society, pages 2103-2107, oct 2003.
17. C. Madison, W. Thompson, D. Kersten, P. Shirley, and B. Smits. Use of interreflection and shadow for surface contact. Perception and Psychophysics, 63(2):187-194, 2001.
18. M. J. Massimino and T. B. Sheridan. Sensory substitution for force feedback in teleoperation. Presence, 2(4):344-352, 1993.
19. W. A. McNeely, K. D. Puterbaugh, and J. J. Troy. Six degree-of-freedom haptic rendering using voxel sampling. In Proceedings of the ACMSIG-GRAPH '99, pages 401-408, 1999.
20. W. A. McNeely, K. D. PuterBaugh, and J. J. Troy. Voxel-based 6-dof haptic rendering improvements. Haptics-e, 3(7), 2006.
21. X. Merlhiot. GVM/LMD++ physics engine. Technical Report DTSI/SCRI/LCI/05RT.011, CEA, 2005.
22. M. A. Otaduy and M. C. Lin. User-centric viewpoint computation for haptic exploration and manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization Conference, pages 311-318, 2001.
23. B. Potzold, M. F. Zach, B. Faerber, B. Deml, H. Egermeier, J. Schilp, and S. Clarke. A study on visual, auditory, and haptic feedback for assembly tasks. Presence, 1 (13):16-21, feb 2004.
24. N. Raghuvanshi and M. C. Lin. Symphony: Real-time physically-based sound synthesis. In Proceedings of Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, 2006.
25. S. Redon. Algorithms for interactive dynamics simulation of rigid bodies. PhD thesis, University of Evry, oct 2002.
26. L. C. Wanger, J. A. Ferwerda, and D. P. Greenberg. Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 12(3):44-51, 54-58, 1992.