Is there evidence that methyl heptine carbonate causes allergic contact dermatitis?

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 259-271

  Hostynek, Jurij J ^a   Maibach, Howard I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Methyl heptine carbonate

Indexed keywords

4 METHOXYBENZYL ALCOHOL; ALPHA AMYLCINNAMALDEHYDE; ALPHA ISOMETHYLIONONE; CARBONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CITRONELLOL; COSMETIC; FRAGRANCE; GERANIOL; METHYL GROUP; METHYL HEPTINE CARBONATE;

CROSS REACTION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; REVIEW; RISK MANAGEMENT; SENSITIZATION; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN IRRITATION;

ANIMALS; CAPRYLATES; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; MODELS, ANIMAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PERFUME; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; TOXICITY TESTS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33845673997     PISSN: 15569527     EISSN: 15569535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15569520601013202     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers (SCCNFP). Opinion concerning fragrance allergy in consumers. A review of the problem. Analysis of the need for appropriate consumer information and identification of consumer allergens. Adopted by the SCCNFP during the plenary session of 8 December 1999 (SCCNFP/0017/98 Final, December 1999).
2. Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Operational definition of a causative contact allergen - a study with six fragrance allergens. Exog Dermatol 2003; 2:279-285.
3. Benezra C, Sigman CC, Perry LR, Helmes CT, Maibach HI. A systemic search for structure-activity relationships of skin contact sensitizers: methodology. J Invest Dermatol 1985; 85:351-356.
4. Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Is there evidence that alpha-iso-methylionone causes allergic dermatitis? Exog Dermatol 2004; 3:121-125.
5. Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Is there evidence that anisyl alcohol causes allergic dermatitis? Exog Dermatol 2003; 2:230-233.
6. Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Is there evidence that linalool causes allergic dermatitis? Exog Dermatol 2003; 2:223-229.
7. Hostynek JJ. Is there evidence that amylcinnamic aldehyde causes allergic dermatitis? Exog Dermatol 2004; 3:35-46.
8. Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Sensitization potential of citronellol. Dermatology 2004; 3:307-312.
9. Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Is there evidence that geraniol causes allergic dermatitis? Exog Dermatol 2003; 3:318-331.
10. Hostynek JJ, Magee PS. Performance of an SARQSAR model predictive of human ACD. In Vitro Mol Toxicol 1999; 12:203-211.
11. Klecak G. The open epicutaneous test (OET), a predictive test procedure in the guinea pig for estimation of allergenic properties of simple chemical compounds, their mixtures and of finished cosmetic preparations. Presented at the International Federation Societies Cosmetic Chemists, Basel, Switzerland, September 18, 1979.
12. Klecak G. The Freund's complete adjuvant test and the open epicutaneous test. Curr Prob Dermatol 1985; 14:152-171.
13. Klecak G, Geleick H, Frey JR: Screening of fragrance materials for allergenicity in the guinea pig. I. Comparison of four testing methods. J Soc Cosmetic Chem Jpn 1977; 28:53-64.
14. Givaudan Corporation for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials Inc. Open and Closed Epicutaneous and Maximization Tests of Fragrance Materials in Guinea Pigs. 1985.
15. Sharp DW. The sensitization potential of some perfume ingredients tested using a modified Draize procedure. Toxicology 1978; 9:261-271.
16. Johnson AW, Goodwin BFJ. The Draize test and modifications. Curr Prob Dermatol 1985; 14:31-38.
17. Buehler E, Kreuzmann J, Fischer J, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Closed epicutaneous test of methyl-2-octynoate, methyl-2-nonynoate, benzyl acetate, trans,trans-2,4-hexadienal, 2-hexylidene cyclopentanone, hexen-2-al, trans-2-hexenal diethyl acetal and isoeugenol in guinea pigs. 1985.
18. Buehler E, Kreuzmann J, Fischer J, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Closed epicutaneous test of 2- hexylidenecyclopentanone, methyl 2-nonynoate and methyl 2-octynoate in guinea pigs. 1985.
19. Buehler E, Kreuzmann J, Garling B, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Delayed contact hypersensitivity study of methyl heptine carbonate in guinea pigs. 1986.
20. Prince HN, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Maguire hypersensitivity test of fragrance materials in the guinea pig. 1973.
21. Buehler E, Kreuzmann JJ, Doyle RL, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Guinea pig maximization test. Report to RIFM. 1985.
22. Betts CJ, Dearman RJ, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Methyl 2-octynoate diluted with vehicle 1:3 EtOH:DEP: Local Lymph Node Assay. Report to RIFM. 2005.
23. Kligman AM, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. The contact-sensitization potential of fragrance materials by maximization testing in humans. 1972.
24. Epstein WL, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Report on human maximization studies. 1974.
25. Kligman AM, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Report on human maximization studies. 1974.
26. Kligman AM, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Report on human maximization studies. 1975.
27. Epstein WL, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Report on human maximization studies. 1975.
28. Epstein WL, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Report on human maximization studies. 1976.
29. Kligman AM, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Report on human maximization studies. 1977.
30. Kligman AM, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Report on human maximization studies. 1973.
31. Takanami I. Newly recognized primary sensitizers, methyl heptine carbonate and costus root oil to evaluate cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity on various chest diseases. Nippon Kyobu Shikkan Gako 1981; 19:478-786.
32. IFF Incorporated. Human repeated patch test on methyl-2-nonynoate and isoeugenol. Unpublished report made available to the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. 1964.
33. IFF Incorporated. Repeated insult patch test of cinnamyl nitrile, methyl 2-octynoate and ethyl alcohol in human subjects. Unpublished report made available to the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. 1965.
34. Harrison LB, Yoskowitz BL, Stolman LP, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Human repeated insult patch test of methyl 2-octynoate and methyl 2-nonynoate. Unpublished report No. 12367. 1989.
35. Harrison LB, Yoskowitz BL, Stolman LP, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Human repeated insult patch test of methyl 2-octynoate. Unpublished report No. 12368. 1989.
36. Harrison LB, Zigarelli B, Stolman LP, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Repeated insult patch test of methyl 2-octynoate in human subjects. Unpublished report No. 12452. 1990.
37. Harrison LB, Zigarelli B, Stolman LP, for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Repeated insult patch test of methyl 2-octynoate and methyl 2-nonynoate in human subjects. Unpublished report No. 12456. 1990.
38. VanKetel WG. Dermatitis from an aftershave. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4:117.
39. English JSC, Rycroft RJG. Allergic contact dermatitis from methyl heptine and methyl octine carbonates. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18:174-175.
40. Malten KE. Four bakers showing positive patch-tests to a number of fragrance materials, which can also be used as flavors. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1979; 85:117-121.
41. Mitchell JC, Adams RM, Glendenning WE, Fisher A, Kanof N, Larsen W, Maibach HI, Rudner EJ, Schnorr W, Storrs F, Taylor JS. Results of standard patch tests with substances abandoned. Contact Dermatitis 1982; 8:336-337.
42. Malten KE, Van Ketel WG, Nater JP, Leim DH. Reactions in selected patients to 22 fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 11:1-10.
43. International Fragrance Association. Closed patch test of fragrance materials on the epidermis. Unpublished report. 1974.
44. Ishihara M. Problems of closed patch tests with ingredients of cosmetic products. J Jpn Cosmetic Sci Soci 1977; 1:87-102.
45. Ishihara M. The environment and the skin. J Med Soc Toho Univ 1978; 25:750-766.
46. Basketter DA, Blaikie L, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, Harvey P, Evans P, White IR, Rycroft RJG. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42:344-348.
47. Ale SI, Maibach HI. Clinical relevance in allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatosen 1995; 43:119-121.
48. Lachapelle J-M. A proposed relevance scoring system for positive allergic patch test reactions: practical implications and limitations. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36:39-43.
49. de Groot AC. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to preservatives and fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41:224-227.
50. International Fragrance Association (IFRA). Code & Standards. http://www.ifraorg.org, accessed April 6, 2006.
51. European Commission. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EECon the approximation of the laws of the member states relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union 2003; L66:26-35.
52. Vey M. Procedures for supplying fragrance information promptly to dermatologists. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48:56-58.