Erratum to "What future for light rail in the UK after Ten Year Transport Plan targets are scrapped?". [Transp. Policy 14(1) (2007) 81-93] (DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.10.001);What future for light rail in the UK after Ten Year Transport Plan targets are scrapped?

Transport Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 81-93

  Knowles, Richard D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Funding transport schemes; Light rail; Ten Year Transport Plan; Transport targets

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33845664520     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.03.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (52)

1. ASSTRA, 2005. Local Public Transport in Italy: Legislation, Financing System and Analysis of Travel Demand, Associazione Trasporti, Rome.
2. ATM. Barcelona Metropolitan Transport Authority unpublished data (2003), ATM, Barcelona
3. CfIT, 2005. Affordable Mass Transit Guidance. Helping you Choose the Best System for Your Area, Commission for Integrated Transport, London.
4. Cheek, C., 2006. Is light rail funding back on the agenda? Transit, 18th August, pp. 10-13.
5. Clark, A., 2004. How Prescott's masterplan was dumped. The Guardian, 21st July.
6. Davison L.J., and Knowles R.D. Bus quality partnerships, modal shift and traffic decongestion. Journal of Transport Geography 14 (2006) 177-194
7. Decourriere, F., 2005. All aboard the tram! Metro Report 1985-2005. Railway Gazette International, London, pp. 45-46.
8. DETR. A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone, Cm 3950 (1998), The Stationery Office, London
9. DETR. Transport 2010: The Ten Year Plan, Department of the Environment, Transport and The Regions (2000), The Stationery Office, London
10. DfT. The Future of Rail, White Paper Cm 6233, Department for Transport (2004), The Stationery Office, London
11. DfT. The Future of Transport: a Network for 2030, White Paper Cm 6234, Department for Transport (2004), The Stationery Office, London
12. DfT, 2004c. Quality Contract: Consultation Document, 〈www.dft.gov.uk〉.
13. DfT. Transport Statistics Great Britain 2005 (2005), Department for Transport, London
14. DfT. Light Rail Statistics-England: Key Facts. National Statistics, Department for Transport (2005), The Stationery Office, London
15. Docherty I. Interrogating the ten-year transport plan. Area 33 3 (2001) 321-328
16. In: Docherty I., and Shaw J. (Eds). A New Deal for Transport? The UK's Struggle with the Sustainable Transport Agenda, RGS-IBG Book Series (2003), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
17. Edinburgh, 2006. Edinburgh's World-Class Tram Network One Step Closer, City of Edinburgh Council Press Release, 26th January.
18. Fowler, D., 2006. Merseytram case against Darling hits court buffers, Transport Times, 10th February p. 14.
19. Garcia R., and Rubin T. Crossroad blues: the MTA Consent Decree and just transportation. In: Lucas K. (Ed). Running on Empty: Transport, Social Exclusion and Environmental Justice (2004), Policy Press, London 221-256
20. GMPTA, 2005. Metrolink Phase 3 Report, 4th February, Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority, Manchester.
21. GMPTA/E, 2005. Submission to the House of Commons Transport Committee: Integrated Transport-The Future of Light Rail and Modern Trams in Britain, Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority and Executive, Manchester.
22. GMPTE. Metrolink. The Light Rail Revolution Continues (2006), Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive, Manchester
23. Greenberg, J.B., 2004. Light Rail Development in the United States and the United Kingdom since 1980: A Comparative Analysis, School of Urban and Public Affairs, University of Louisville, Kentucky (unpublished).
24. Hetherington, P., 2005. Lessons from America could put local government on track for greater autonomy. The Guardian, 6th July.
25. Hondius, H., 2005. Orders grow and capacity falls, but new entrants upset the market, Metro Report 1985-2005. Railway Gazette International, London, pp. 55-64.
26. House of Commons ETRA Select Committee, 2000. Light Rapid Transport Systems, Eighth Report of Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Select Committee, HC 153. The Stationery Office, London.
27. House of Commons Report. Urban Public Transport, the Light Rail Option (1991), HMSO, London
28. House of Commons Transport Committee, 2005a. Integrated Transport: the Future of Light Rail and Modern Trams in the United Kingdom, Tenth Report of Session 2004-05, vol. 1, HC 378-1. The Stationery Office, London.
29. House of Commons Transport Committee, 2005b. Government Response to the Committee's 10th Report of Session 2004-05, HC 526. The Stationery Office, London.
30. Kelso, P., 2004. New London stadium not for football. The Guardian, 6th October.
31. Knowles R.D. Light rail transport. In: Whitelegg J. (Ed). Traffic Congestion: Is There a Way Out (1992), Leading Edge Press, Hawes 107-133
32. Knowles R.D. Transport impacts of Greater Manchester's Metrolink light rail system. Journal of Transport Geography 4 1 (1996) 1-14
33. Knowles R.D. Urban Traffic Congestion and Integrated Transport. Geography 85 1 (2000) 72-75
34. Knowles R.D. Impacts of privatising Britain's rail passenger services-franchising, re-franchising and Ten Year Transport Plan targets. Environment and Planning A 36 (2004) 2065-2087
35. Knowles R.D., and White P. Light Rail and London Underground. In: Docherty I., and Shaw J. (Eds). A New Deal for Transport? (2003), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 135-157
36. Le Tournier, M., 2005. Trams at the heart of a model integrated public transport network. Metro Report 1985-2005. Railway Gazette International, London, pp. 35-36.
37. Montes C. Transport and land use planning; the case of British and French conurbations. Journal of Transport Geography 3 2 (1995) 127-141
38. National Audit Office, 2004. Improving public transport in England through light rail, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 518 Session 2003-2004. The Stationery Office, London.
39. Perimetres de Transport Urbain, 2005. 〈http://www.insee.fr/fr/insee_regions/languedoc/zoom/zonage/def/O_PTU.pdf〉, downloaded 1st November.
40. PTEG, 2004. We must learn from the French on tram schemes. Passenger Transport Executive Group, Leeds.
41. PTEG, 2005. What light rail can do for cities: a review of the evidence: Final Report, Passenger Transport Executive Group, Leeds.
42. Pucher J. Public transportation. In: Hanson S., and Giuliano G. (Eds). The Geography of Urban Transportation. third ed (2004), The Guilford Press, New York 199-236
43. Puiri, M., 2005. Funding law drives urban expansion, Metro Report 1985-2005. Railway Gazette International, London, pp. 10-12.
44. Shaw J. TGRG Page. Journal of Transport Geography 13 3 (2005) 293-294
45. Sytral, 2003. Rapport Financier 2002, Sytral, Lyon.
46. Taylor B.D. The Geography of Urban Transportation Finance. In: Hanson S., and Giuliano G. (Eds). The Geography of Urban Transportation. third ed (2004), The Guilford Press, New York 294-331
47. TfL, 2005/6a. Docklands Light Railway: London City Airport Extension, Transport for London DLR, London.
48. TfL, 2005/6b. Docklands Light Railway: Woolwich Arsenal Extension, Transport for London DLR, London.
49. TfL, 2005/6c. Docklands Light Railway: Stratford International Extension, Transport for London DLR, London.
50. Wainwright, M., 2004. Rejection of northern tram plans prompts suspicions of London bias. The Guardian, 21st July.
51. Walmsley, D., Perrett, K., 1992. The Effects of Rapid Transit on Public Transport and Urban Development, State of the Art Review 6. Transport Research Laboratory, Department for Transport, London.
52. World Bank, 2005. Urban Public Transport Systems Integration and Funding (Final Report), Prointec Inocsa Stereocarto, Spain 〈http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/transport/utsr.nsf/0/17〉, accessed 1st November.