The formation of living and non-living superordinate concepts as a function of individual differences

Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain and Cognition

Volumn 2, Issue 19, 2006, Pages

  Kalénine, Solène ^a   Bonthoux, Françoise ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE MENDÈS FRANCE   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845649453     PISSN: 13796100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Behl-Chadha, G. (1996). Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy. Cognition, 60(2), 105-141.
2. Blaye, A., Bernard-Peyron, V., & Bonthoux, F. (2000). Au delà des conduites de catégorisation: Le développement des représentations catégorielles entre 5 et 9 ans. Archives de Psychologie, 68, 59-82.
3. Bonthoux, F. (2001). The development of categorization. In O. Benga & M. Miclea (Eds.), Development and cogntion (pp. 59-88). Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitara Clujeana.
4. Bonthoux, F., Scheuner, N., & Roll, N. (2003). Des modes de construction des catégories différenciés selon le domaine. Eléments de réponse chez l'enfant et l'adulte âgé. Cogntion, Brain, Behavior, 7, 91-109.
5. Boyer, P., Bedoin, N., & Honore, S. (2000). Relative contributions of kind- and domain-level concepts to expectations concerning unfamiliar exemplars: Developmental change and domain differences. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 457-479.
6. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., et al. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400-404.
7. Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3/6), 213-261.
8. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12(4), 478-484.
9. Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 163-201.
10. Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 457-469.
11. Deak, G., & Bauer, P. J. (1995). The effects of task comprehension on preschoolers' and adults' categorization choices. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(3), 393-427.
12. Devlin, J. T., Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: a computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(1), 77-94.
13. Dunham, P., & Dunham, F. (1995). Developmental Antecedents of taxonomic and Thematic Strategies at 3 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 31(3), 483-493.
14. Farah, M. J., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Expérimental Psychology: General, 120(4), 339-357.
15. Filliter, J. H., McMullen, P. A., & Westwood, D. (2005). Manipulability and living/non-living category effects on object identification. Brain and Cognition, 57(1), 61-65.
16. Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and non living concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(2), 125-174.
17. Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K. S., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A. (1998). Beyond labeling: the role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(1), 1-157.
18. Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 58(6), 1532-1541.
19. Gentner, D., & Namy, L. L. (1999). Comparison in the Development of Categories. Cognitive Development, 14(4), 487-513.
20. Gerlach, C., Law, I., & Paulson, O. B. (2002). When action turns into words. Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1230-1239.
21. Golinkoff, R. M., Shuff-Bailey, M., Olguin, R., & Ruan, W. (1995). Young Children Extend Novel Words at the Basic Level: Evidence for the Principle of Categorical Scope. Developmental Psychology, 31(3), 494-507.
22. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage, 6(4), 231-236.
23. Hughes, D., Woodcock, J., & Funnell, E. (2005). Conceptions of objects across categories: childhood patterns resemble those of adults. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 1-19.
24. Jonhnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(2), 71-79.
25. Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M., & Patterson, K. (2003). Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 30-46.
26. Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1995). Principle-based inferences in young children's categorization: Revisiting the impact of function on the naming of artifacts. Cognitive Development, 10(3), 347-380.
27. Kemler Nelson, D. G., Chan Egan, L., & Holt, M. B. (2004). When children ask, "what is it?" What do they want to know about artifacts? Psychological Science, 15(6), 384-389.
28. Kemler Nelson, D. G., Frankenfield, A., Morris, C., & Blair, E. (2000). Young children's use of functional information to categorize artifacts: three factors that matter. Cognition, 77, 133-168.
29. Kemler Nelson, D. G., Russell, R., & Jones, K. (2000). Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. Child Development, 71(5), 1271-1288.
30. Lautrey, J. (1990). Esquisse d'un modèle pluraliste du développement cognitif. In M. Reuchlin, J. Lautrey, C. Marendaz & T. Ohlmann (Eds.), Cognition: l'individuel et l'universel (pp. 185-216). Paris: PUF.
31. Lautrey, J. (2003). A pluralistic approach to cognitive differentiation and development. In T. Lubart (Ed.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 117-131). Washington, DC: A.P.A. Press.
32. Lautrey, J., & Caroff, X. (1997). Variability and cognitive development. Polish Quarterly of Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 71-89.
33. Laws, K. R., Humber, S. A., Ramsey, D. J. C., & McCarthy, R. A. (1995). Probing sensory and associative semantics for animals and objects in normal subjects. Memory, 3(3/4), 397-408.
34. Liu, J., Golinkoff, R. M., & Sak, K. (2001). One cow does not an animal make: young children can extend novel words at the superordinate level. Child Development, 72(6), 1674-1694.
35. Madole, K. L., Oakes, L. M., & Cohen, L. B. (1993). Developmental Changes in Infants' Attention to Function and Form-Function Correlations. Cognitive Development, 8, 189-209.
36. Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99(4), 587-604.
37. Mandler, J. M. (2000). Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 3-36.
38. Markman, E. M., Cox, B., & Machida, S. (1981). The standard object-sorting task as a mesure of conceptual organization. Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 115-117.
39. Markman, E. M., & Hutchinson, J. E. (1984). Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1-27.
40. Myung, J.-Y., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (in press). Playing on the typewriter, typing on the panio: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 1-21.
41. Namy, L. L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears: young children's use of comparison in category learning. J Exp Psychol Gen, 131(1), 5-15.
42. Nelson, K. (1983). The derivation of concepts and categories from event representations. In E. K. Scholnick (Ed.), New trends in conceptual representation: Challenges to Piaget's theory? (pp. 129-149). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
43. Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense. The acquisition of shared meaning. New York: Academic Press.
44. Osborne, J. G., & Calhoun, D. O. (1998). Themes, taxons, and trial types in children's matching to sample: methodological considerations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68(1), 35-50.
45. Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D., & Rosenkrantz, S. L. (1993). Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 22(4), 463-475.
46. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 495-553.
47. Sartori, G., & Job, R. (1988). The oyster with four legs: a neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(1), 105-132.
48. Scheuner, N., & Bonthoux, F. (2004). La construction des catégories surordonnées chez l'enfant: Utilisation différentielle des indices perceptifs et contextuel dans le domaine du vivant et du non-vivant. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57, 105-109.
49. Siegler, R. S., & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
50. Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection and cognitive change. In G. S. Halford (Ed.), Developing cognitive competence. New approaches to process modelling (pp. 31-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Smiley, S. S., & Brown, A. L. (1979). Conceptual preference fot thematic ot taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 249-257.
52. Waxman, S. R., & Gelman, R. (1986). Preschoolers' use of superordinate relations in classification and language. Cognitive Development, 1, 139-156.
53. Waxman, S. R., & Namy, L. L. (1997). Challenging the notion of a thematic preference in young children. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 555-567.
54. Wisniewski, E. J., & Bassok, M. (1999). What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cognit Psychol, 39(3-4), 208-238.