Compensation through rosette formation: The response of scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata: Polemoniaceae) to mammalian herbivory

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1298-1303

  Becklin, Katie M ^a,b   Kirkpatrick, H Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Ancillary rosettes; Compensation; Fecundity; Plant herbivore interactions; Regrowth

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; FRUITS; GROWTH KINETICS;

FECUNDITY; PLANT HERBIVORE INTERACTIONS; ROSETTES; SEASONS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; COMPENSATION; DEER; DICOTYLEDON; FECUNDITY; HERBIVORY; NATIONAL PARK; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; REGROWTH; VEGETATIVE REPRODUCTION;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; FRUITS; GROWTH; INFLORESCENCE; PLANTS; STEMS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES]; WENATCHEE NATIONAL FOREST;

IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA; MAMMALIA; POLEMONIACEAE;

EID: 33845648973     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B06-099     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bergelson, J., and Crawley, M.J. 1992a. Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: the disadvantage of being eaten. Am. Nat. 139: 870-882. doi:10.1086/285362.
2. Bergelson, J., and Crawley, M.J. 1992b. The effects of grazers on the performance of individuals and populations of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia, 90: 435-444. doi:10.1007/BF00317703.
3. Bergelson, J., Juenger, T., and Crawley, M.J. 1996. Regrowth following herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: compensation but not overcompensation. Am. Nat. 148: 744-755. doi:10.1086/285952.
4. Brody, A.K., and Mitchell, R.J. 1997. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia, 110: 86-93. doi:10.1007/s004420050136.
5. Campbell, D. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am. Nat. 137: 713-737. doi:10.1086/285190.
6. Campbell, D. 1997. Genetic and environmental variation in life-history traits of a monocarpic perennial: a decade-long field experiment. Evolution, 51: 373-382. doi:10.2307/2411109.
7. Caruso, C.M. 1999. Pollination of Ipomopsis aggregata: effects of intra- vs. interspecific competition. Am. J. Bot. 86: 663-668. doi:10.2307/2656575.
8. Collins, W.B., and Urness, P.J. 1983. Feeding behavior and habitat selection of mule deer and elk on northern Utah summer range. J. Wildl. Manage. 47: 646-663.
9. Frank, D.A., and McNaughton, S.J. 1992. The ecology of plants, large mammalian herbivores, and drought in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 73: 2043-2058. doi:10.2307/1941454.
10. Grant, V., and Wilken, D.H. 1986. Taxonomy of the Ipomopsis aggregata group (Polemoniaceae). Bot. Gaz. 147: 359-371. doi:10.1086/337603.
11. Juenger, T., and Bergelson, J. 1997. Pollen and resource limitation of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology, 78: 1684-1695. doi:10.2307/2266093.
12. Juenger, T., and Bergelson, J. 2000a. Does early season browsing influence the effect of self-pollination in scarlet gilia? Ecology, 81: 41-48. doi:10.2307/177132.
13. Juenger, T., and Bergelson, J. 2000b. The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution, 54: 764-777. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0764:TEOCTH]2.3.CO;2.
14. Juenger, T., and Bergelson, J. 2000c. Factors limiting rosette recruitment in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: seed and disturbance limitation. Oecologia, 123: 358-363. doi:10.1007/s004420051022.
15. Lennartsson, T., Nilsson, P., and Tuomi, J. 1998. Induction of overcompensation in the field gentian, Gentianella campestris. Ecology, 79: 1061-1072. doi:10.2307/176601.
16. Levine, M.T., and Paige, K.N. 2004. Direct and indirect effects of drought on compensation following herbivory in scarlet gilia. Ecology, 85: 3185-3191.
17. Maschinski, J., and Whitham, T.G. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influences of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am. Nat. 134: 1-19.
18. Merrill, E.H. 1994. Summer foraging ecology of wapiti (Cervus elaphus roosevelti) in the Mount St. Helens blast zone. Can. J. Zool. 72: 303-311.
19. Mothershead, K., and Marquis, R.J. 2000. Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant-pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa. Ecology, 81: 30-40. doi:10.2307/177131.
20. Moore, M., Ferber, G., and Kramer, K. 2003. 2002-2003 annual report. Northwest Weather and Avalanche Center, Seattle, Wash.
21. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. Washington 2003 crop weather season review. Washington Agricultural Statistics, Olympia, Wash.
22. Nilsson, P., Tuomi, J., and Astrom, M. 1996. Bud dormancy as a bet-hedging strategy. Am. Nat. 147: 269-281. doi:10.1086/285849.
23. Paige, K.N. 1994. Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: differences in response, differences in experimental protocol: a reply to Bergelson and Crawley. Am. Nat. 143: 739-749. doi:10.1086/285630.
24. Paige, K.N. 1999. Regrowth following ungulate herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: geographic evidence for overcompensation. Oecologia, 118: 316-324. doi:10.1007/s004420050732.
25. Paige, K.N., and Whitham, T.G. 1987a. Flexible life history traits: shifts by scarlet gilia in response to pollinator abundance. Ecology, 68: 1691-1695. doi:10.2307/1939861.
26. Paige, K.N., and Whitham, T.G. 1987b. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am. Nat. 129: 407-416. doi:10.1086/284645.
27. Tuomi, J., Nilsson, P., and Astrom, M. 1994. Plant compensatory responses: bud dormancy as an adaptation to herbivory. Ecology, 75: 1429-1436. doi:10.2307/1937466.