Efficiency of Carbon storage with leakage: Physical and economical approaches

Energy

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 540-548

  Teng, Fei ^a,b   Tondeur, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide; Carbon sequestration; Efficiency assessment; Greenhouse control; Leakage

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; LEAKAGE (FLUID); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE CONTROL;

ENERGY STORAGE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY STORAGE; LEAKAGE (FLUID); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; LEAKAGE; METHODOLOGY; RADIATIVE FORCING;

EID: 33845640960     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change, 1998.
2. Marland G., Fruit K., and Sedjo R. Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence. Environ Sci Policy 4 6 (2001) 259-268
3. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Land use, land-use change, and forestry: a special report of the IPCC (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
4. 2 in leaky reservoirs. Clean Technol Environ Policy 5 3-4 (2003) 181-189
5. Keller K, Yang Z, Hall M, Bradford DF. Carbon dioxide sequestration: when and how much? 2003. See also: http://www.princeton.edu/~ceps/workingpaper/94bradford.pdf
6. Herzog H., Caldeira K., and Reilly J. An issue of permanence: assessing the effectiveness of temporary carbon storage. Climatic Change 59 3 (2003) 293-310
7. Chomitz MK. Evaluating carbon offsets from forestry and energy projects: how do they compare? Report no. World Bank policy research working paper 2357. New York: World Bank, 2000.
8. Smith S.J., and Wigley M.L. Global warming potentials: 1. Climatic implications of emissions reductions. Climatic Change 44 4 (2000) 445-457
9. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate change 2001: the scientific basis (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
10. Lashof D.A., and Ahuja D.R. Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 344 (1990) 529-531
11. Houghton J.T., Meria Filho L.G., Bruce J., Hoesung L., Callander B.A., Haites E., et al. Climate change 1994: radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC 1992 IS92 emission scenario (1995), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
12. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Carbon dioxide capture and storage (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
13. 2 injected into an aquifer. In: Kaya Y., Ohyama K., and Gale J. (Eds). GHGT-6: Sixth international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (2003), Pergamon, Kyoto, Japan, Oxford 489-494
14. 2: a statistical approach to assessing performance and risk. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (GHGT-7), Vancouver, Canada, 2004. p. 693-700.
15. 2 from Weyburn. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (GHGT-7), Vancouver, Canada, 2004. p. 721-30.
16. Caldeira K, Herzog H, Wickett M. Predicting and evaluating the effectiveness of ocean carbon sequestration by direct injection. In: First national conference on carbon sequestration, Washington, DC, 2001. See also: http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/01/carbon_seq/p48.pdf.
17. 2 separation and capture. Technology 7 (2000) 13-23
18. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme. Carbon dioxide capture from power stations, Report no. ISBN-1 898373 15 9. Paris: OECD, 1994.
19. Kleinfeld I.H. Engineering economics: analysis for evaluation of alternatives (1993), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
20. IEA (International Energy Agency). World energy outlook (2002), IEA Publications, Paris
21. Bruvoll A., and Larsen B.M. Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work?. Energy Policy 32 4 (2004) 493-505
22. Baer P. An issue of scenarios: carbon sequestration as investment and the distribution of risk. Climatic Change 59 3 (2003) 283-291
23. Hepple R.P., and Benson S.M. Implications of surface seepage on the effectiveness of geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy. In: Kaya Y., Ohyama K., and Gale J. (Eds). GHGT-6: sixth international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (2003), Pergamon, Kyoto, Japan, Oxford 261-266
24. Nordhaus W.D., and Yang Z. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. American Economic Review 86 4 (1996) 741-756