Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: Do carbon taxes work?

Energy Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 493-505

  Bruvoll, Annegrete ^a   Larsen, Bodil Merethe ^a  

^a STATISTICS NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Applied general equilibrium model; Carbon taxes; Greenhouse gas emissions

Indexed keywords

GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; TAXATION;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

ENERGY POLICY;

CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; EMISSION CONTROL; POLLUTION TAX;

NORWAY;

EID: 0141993332     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00151-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aasness J. Bye T. Mysen H.T. Welfare effects of emission taxes in Norway Energy Economics 18 4 1996 335-346
2. Alfsen, K.H., Bye, T., Holmøy, H. (Eds.), 1996. MSG-EE: an applied general equilibrium model for energy and environmental analyses. Social and Economic Studies 96, Statistics Norway.
3. Brendemoen A. Vennemo H. A climate treaty and the Norwegian economy: a CGE assessment Energy Journal 15 1 1994 77-93
4. Bruvoll A. Bye T. Methane emissions and permit prices for greenhouse gases Economic Survey 4 1998 31-40
5. Bruvoll A. Fæhn T. Strøm B. Quantifying central hypotheses on environmental Kuznets curves for a rich economy: a computable general equilibrium study The Scottish Journal of Political Economy 50 2 2003 149-173
6. Bruvoll A. Medin H. Factors behind the environmental Kuznets curve-a decomposition of the changes in air pollution Environmental and Resource Economics 24 2003 27-48
7. Bye B. Environmental tax reform and producer foresight: an intertemporal computable general equilibrium analysis Journal of Policy Modelling 22 6 2000 719-752
8. Bye, B., Nyborg, K., 1999. The welfare effects of carbon policies: grandfathered quotas versus differentiated taxes. Discussion Papers 261, Statistics Norway.
9. 2 emissions from the Norwegian petroleum extraction. ECON Report 50, Oslo (in Norwegian).
10. Ekins P. Speck S. Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe Environmental and Resource Economics 13 1999 369-396
11. Fæhn, T., Holmøy, E., 2000. Welfare effects of trade liberalization in distorted economies: a dynamic general equilibrium assessment for Norway. In: Harrison, G.W., Hougaard Jensen, S.E., Haagen Pedersen, L., Rutherford, T.R. (Eds.), Using Dynamic General Equilibrium Models for Policy Analyses. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
12. 2: a computable general equilibrium assessment Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 1 1992 53-69
13. 2 abatement policies Resource and Energy Economics 21 1999 211-253
14. Hagem, C., Holtsmark, B., 2001. From small to insignificant: climate impact of the Kyoto protocol with and without US. CICERO Policy Note 1, http://www.cicero.uio.no
15. Hoel M. Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors? Journal of Public Economics 59 1 1996 17-32
16. Holmøy, E., Strøm, B., Åvitsland, T., 1999. Empirical characteristics of a static version of the MSG-6 model. Documents 1, Statistics Norway.
17. Jorgenson D.W. Wilcoxen P.J. Reducing US carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of different instruments Journal of Policy Modelling 15 5-6 1993 491-520
18. 2 tax Environmental and Resource Economics 9 3 1997 275-290
19. 2 emissions: the case of the European union Energy Economics 22 2000 383-394
20. 2 emission reductions: the impact of rising energy costs Energy Journal 12 1 1991 87-107
21. Ministry of Environment, 2002. Norway's third national communication under the Framework Convention on climate change. Report, Oslo, June 2002.
22. Ministry of Finance, 1996. Policies for a better environment and high employment. An English summary of the Norwegian Green Tax Commission. Ministry of Finance, Norway.
23. Murtishaw S. Schipper L. Disaggregated analysis of US energy consumption in the 1990s: evidence of the effects of the internet and rapid economic growth Energy Policy 29 2001 1335-1356
24. 2 emissions. Evidence from Six Global Models. Economics and Statistics Working Papers, OECD, Paris.
25. OECD, 2002. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. Draft, JT00121767, OECD, Paris.
26. 2O in Norway. Reports 24, Statistics Norway.
27. Schipper L. Murtishaw S. Khrushch M. Ting M. Karbuz S. Unander F. Carbon emissions from manufacturing energy use in 13 IEA countries: long-term trends through 1995 Energy Policy 29 2001 667-688
28. Selden T.M. Forrest A.S. Lockhart J.E. Analyzing the reductions in US air pollution emissions: 1970 to 1990 Land Economics 75 1 1999 1-21
29. Statistics Norway, 1997. National accounts 1978-1996. Official Statistics of Norway C 426.
30. 2 emission Kuznets curve Energy Policy 27 1999 691-694
31. Sutherland R.J. The impact of potential climate change commitments on six industries in the United States Energy Policy 26 1998 765-776
32. Torvanger A. Manufacturing sector carbon dioxide emissions in nine OECD countries, 1973-87 Energy Economics 13 1991 168-186
33. United Nations, 1987. Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Zwaan B.C.C. Gerlagh R. Klaassen G. Schrattenholzer L. Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling Energy Economics 24 2002 1-19