Predicting biliary complications in right lobe liver transplant recipients according to distance between donor's bile duct and corresponding hepatic artery

Radiology

Volumn 242, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 144-151

  Yeh, Benjamin M ^a   Coakley, Fergus V ^a   Westphalen, Antonio C ^a   Joe, Bonnie N ^a   Freise, Chris E ^a   Qayyum, Aliya ^a   McTaggart, Ryan A ^a   Roberts, John P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADIPIODONE; DIPHENHYDRAMINE; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; CALCULATION; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LIVER GRAFT; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; DONOR SELECTION; FEMALE; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMANS; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845639992     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2421052094     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Miller CM, Gondolesi GE, Florman S, et al. One hundred nine living donor liver transplants in adults and children: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 2001;234:301-311.
2. Shah JN, Ahmad NA, Shetty K, et al. Endoscopic management of biliary complications after adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1291-1295.
3. Pascher A, Neuhaus P. Bile duct complications after liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2005;18:627-642.
4. Gondolesi GE, Varotti G, Florman SS, et al. Biliary complications in 96 consecutive right lobe living donor transplant recipients. Transplantation 2004;77:1842-1848.
5. Icoz G, Kilic M, Zeytunlu M, et al. Biliary reconstructions and complications encountered in 50 consecutive right-lobe living donor liver transplantations. Liver Transpl 2003;9:575-580.
6. Chen JS, Yeh BM, Wang ZJ, et al. Concordance of second-order portal venous and biliary tract anatomies on MDCT angiography and MDCT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:70-74.
7. Kitami M, Takase K, Murakami G, et al. Types and frequencies of biliary tract variations associated with a major portal venous anomaly: analysis with multi-detector row CT cholangiography. Radiology 2006;238:156-166.
8. Wang ZJ, Yeh BM, Roberts JP, Breiman RS. Qayyum A, Coakley FV. Living donor candidates for right hepatic lobe transplantation: evaluation at CT cholangiography-initial experience. Radiology 2005;235:899-904.
9. Schroeder T, Malago M, Debatin JF, Goyen M, Nadalin S, Ruehm SG. "All-in-one" imaging protocols for the evaluation of potential living liver donors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography. Liver Transpl 2005;11:776-787.
10. Coskun M, Kayahan EM, Uzbek O, Cakir B, Dalgic A, Haberal M. Imaging of hepatic arterial anatomy for depicting vascular variations in living related liver transplant donor candidates with multidetector computed tomography: comparison with conventional angiography. Transplant Proc 2005;37:1070-1073.
11. Van Beers BE, Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, Canniere L, De Ronde T, Pringot J. Noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1331-1335.
12. Maglinte D, Dorenbusch M. Intravenous infusion cholangiography: an assessment of its role relevant to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Radiol Diagn 1993;34:91-96.
13. Nilsson U. Adverse reactions to iotroxate at intravenous cholangiography: a prospective clinical investigation and review of the literature. Acta Radiol 1987;28:571-575.
14. Sacharias N. Safety of biliscopin. Australas Radiol 1995;39:101.
15. Takeuchi M, Hishiyama H, Kondo S, Katoh H. Efficacy of cholangiography under helical computed tomography for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 2002;32:387-391.
16. Kobayashi M, Matsuura K, Araki K, et al. Three-dimensional demonstration of cystic duct by helical CT scanning. Hepatogastroenterology 2002;49:1491-1495.
17. Kwon AH, Uetsuji S, Ogura T, Kamiyama Y. Spiral computed tomography scanning after intravenous infusion cholangiography for biliary duct anomalies. Am J Surg 1997;174:396-401.
18. Ichii H, Takada M, Kashiwagi R, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of biliary tract using spiral computed tomography for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2002;26:608-611.
19. Schroeder T, Radtke A, Kuehl H, Debatin JF, Malago M, Ruehm SG. Evaluation of living liver donors with an all-inclusive 3D multi-detector row CT protocol. Radiology 2006;238:900-910.
20. Cabada Giadas T, Sarria Octavio de Toledo L, Martinez-Berganza Asensio MT, et al. Helical CT cholangiography in the evaluation of the biliary tract: application to the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:61-70.
21. Breen DJ, Nicholson AA. The clinical utility of spiral CT cholangiography. Clin Radiol 2000;55:733-739.
22. Stockberger SM, Sherman S, Kopecky KK. Helical CT cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 1996;21:98-104.
23. Soto JA, Velez SM, Guzman J. Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:943-948.
24. Caoili EM, Paulson EK, Heyneman LE, Branch MS, Eubanks WS, Nelson RC. Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: feasibility of a novel technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:487-492.
25. Puente SG, Bannura GC. Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg 1983;7:271-276.
26. Yeh BM, Breiman RS, Taouli B, Qayyum A, Roberts JP, Coakley FV. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: comparison of conventional MR, rnangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR, and multi-detector row CT cholangiography-initial experience. Radiology 2004;230:645-651.