Living donor candidates for right hepatic lobe transplantation: Evaluation at CT cholangiography - Initial experience

Radiology

Volumn 235, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 899-904

  Wang, Zhen J ^a   Yeh, Benjamin M ^a   Roberts, John P ^a   Breiman, Richard S ^a   Qayyum, Aliya ^a   Coakley, Fergus V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL ANATOMY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BILIARY TRACT; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 18844371551     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2353040424     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Gridelli B, Remuzzi G. Strategies for making more organs available for transplantation. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:404-410.
2. United Network for Organ Sharing. UNOS registry annual report. Richmond, Va: United Network for Organ Sharing, 2003.
3. Puente SG, Bannura GC. Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg 1983; 7:271-276.
4. Russell E, Yrizzary JM, Montalvo BM, Guerra JG, Al-Refai F. Left hepatic duct anatomy: implications. Radiology 1990; 174:353-356.
5. Marcos A, Ham JM, Fisher RA, Olzinski AT, Posner MP. Surgical management of anatomical variations of the right lobe in living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2000; 231:824-831.
6. Lee VS, Morgan GR, Teperman LW, et al. MR imaging as the sole preoperative imaging modality for right hepatectomy: a prospective study of living adult-to-adult liver donor candidates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1475-1482.
7. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:1-10.
8. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:417-423.
9. Cheng YF, Lee TY, Chen CL, Huang TL, Chen YS, Lui CC. Three-dimensional helical computed tomographic cholangiography: application to living related hepatic transplantation. Clin Transplant 1997; 11:209-213.
10. Schroeder T, Nadalin S, Strattaus J, Debatin JF, Malago M, Ruehm SG. Potential living liver donors: evaluation with an all-in-one protocol with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2002; 224:586-591.
11. Stockberger SM, Sherman S, Kopecky KK. Helical CT cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21:98-104.
12. Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S. Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1994; 192:675-680.
13. Caoili EM, Paulson EK, Heyneman LE, Branch MS, Eubanks WS, Nelson RC. Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: feasibility of a novel technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:487-492.
14. Takeuchi M, Hishiyama H, Kondo S, Katoh H. Efficacy of cholangiography under helical computed tomography for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 2002; 32:387-391.
15. Kobayashi M, Matsuura K, Araki K, et al. Three-dimensional demonstration of cystic duct by helical CT scanning. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49:1491-1495.
16. Ichii H, Takada M, Kashiwagi R, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of biliary tract using spiral computed tomography for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2002; 26:608-611.
17. Kwon AH, Uetsuji S, Ogura T, Kamiyama Y. Spiral computed tomography scanning after intravenous infusion cholangiography for biliary duct anomalies. Am J Surg 1997; 174:396-401.
18. Nambu A, Ichikawa T, Katoh K, Araki T. A case of abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction evidenced by 3D drip infusion cholangiography CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25:653-655.
19. Matsumoto J, Kondo S, Okushiba S, et al. DIC-CT findings of biliary cystadenocarcinoma communicating with the bile duct: a case report. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48:1005-1006.
20. Cabada Giadas T, Sarria Octavio de Toledo L, Martinez-Berganza Asensio MT, et al. Helical CT cholangiography in the evaluation of the biliary tract: application to the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:61-70.
21. Breen DJ, Nicholson AA. The clinical utility of spiral CT cholangiography. Clin Radiol 2000; 55:733-739.
22. Groebli Y, Meyer JL, Tschantz P. Choledochocele demonstrated by computed tomographic cholangiography: report of a case. Surg Today 2000; 30:272-276.
23. Jessen KA, Shrimpton PC, Geleijns J, Panzer W, Tosi G. Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. Appl Radiat Isot 1999; 50:165-172.
24. Huda W, Slone R. Review of radiologic physics. Media, Pa: Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
25. Helm JF, Venu RP, Geenen JE, et al. Effects of morphine on the human sphincter of Oddi. Gut 1988; 29:1402-1407.
26. Flancbaum L, Alden SM, Trooskin SZ. Use of cholescintigrapny with morphine in critically ill patients with suspected cholecystitis. Surgery 1989; 106: 668-673.
27. Flancbaum L, Alden SM. Morphine cholescintigraphy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171:227-232.
28. Ott D, Gelfand D. Complications of gastrointestinal radiologic procedures. II. Complications related to biliary tract studies. Gastrointest Radiol 1981; 6:47-56.
29. Rholl K, Smathers R, McClennan B, Lee J. Intravenous cholangiography in the CT era. Gastrointest Radiol 1985; 10:69-74.
30. Van Beers BE, Lacrosse M, Trigaux J, Canniere LD, De Ronde T, Pringot J. Noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:1331-1335.
31. Nilsson U. Adverse reactions to iotroxate at intravenous cholangiography: a prospective clinical investigation and review of the literature. Acta Radiol 1987; 28: 571-575.
32. Maglinte D, Dorenbusch M. Intravenous infusion cholangiography: an assessment of its role relevant to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Radiol Diagn 1993; 34:91-96.
33. Sacharias N. Safety of Biliscopin (letter). Australas Radiol 1995; 39:101.
34. Lee VS, Rofsky NM, Morgan GR, et al. Volumetric mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced cholangiography to define intrahepatic biliary anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:906-908.
35. Kapoor V, Peterson MS, Baron RL, Patel S, Eghtesad B, Fung JJ. Intrahepatic biliary anatomy of living adult liver donors: correlation of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:1281-1286.
36. Fulcher AS, Szucs RA, Bassignani MJ, Marcos A. Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: preoperative evaluation of the donor with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1483-1491.
37. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. Orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1999; 211:715-722.
38. Yeh BM, Breiman RS, Taouli B, Qayyum A, Roberts JP, Coakley FV. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: comparison of conventional MR, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR, and multi-detector row CT cholangiography-initial experience. Radiology 2004; 230:645-651.