Aging and capacity in the same-different judgment

Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 55-69

  Gottlob, Lawrence R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EYE FIXATION; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GROUPS BY AGE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS; RESPONSE TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33845631858     PISSN: 13825585     EISSN: 17444128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/138255890969528     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information-processing rate. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 201-211). San Diego: Academic Press.
2. Cerella, J., Poon, L. W., & Fozard, J. L. (1982). Age and iconic readout. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 197-202.
3. Gottlob, L. R. (2006). Aging and comparative search for feature differences. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 1-22.
4. Gottlob, L. R., & Madden, D. J. (1998). Time course of allocation of visual attention after equating for sensory differences: An age-related perspective. Psychology and Aging, 13, 138-149.
5. Ingvalson, E. M., & Wenger, M. I. (2005). A strong test of the dual-mode hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 14-35.
6. Miller J. (1978). Multidimensional same-different judgments: Evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 411-422.
7. Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
8. Miller, J., Kuhlwein, E., & Ulrich. R. (2004). Effects of redundant visual stimuli on temporal order judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 563-573.
9. Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1993). Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 357-366.
10. Navon, D. (1984). Resources - A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
11. Nickerson, R. S. (1965). Response times for "same"- "different" judgments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20, 15-18.
12. Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. Psychological Review, 88, 291-326.
13. Salthouse, T. A. (1988). Resource-reduction interpretations of cognitive aging. Developmental Review, 8, 238-272.
14. Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Mechanisms of age-cognition relations in adulthood. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Salthouse, T. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 140-144.
16. Salthouse, T. A., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Closing comments. In T. A. Salthouse & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 689-703). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. SAS Institute Inc (1989). SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 6, (4th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
18. Scialfa, C. T., & Thomas, D. M. (1994). Age differences in same-different judgments as a function of multidimensional similarity. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, P173-P178.
19. Sperling, G. W. (1984). A unified theory of attention and signal detection. In R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 103-181). London: Academic Press.
20. Thapar, A., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on letter discrimination. Psychology and Aging, 18, 415-429.
21. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). On the spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359.
23. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (2004). A theory of interactive parallel processing: New capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. Psychological Review, 111, 1003-1035.
24. Verhaeghen, P. (2002). Age differences in efficiency and effectiveness of encoding for visual search and memory search: A time-accuracy study. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 9, 114-126.
25. Wenger, M. J., & Gibson, B. S. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 708-719.
26. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J.T. (2001). Faces as gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition (pp. 229-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.