Variability of the SNARC effect: Systematic interindividual differences or just random error?

Cortex

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1119-1123

  Wood, Guilherme ^a   Nuerk, Hans Christoph ^a   Willmes, Klaus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; EYE HAND COORDINATION; HUMAN; MOTOR COORDINATION; NOTE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33845631511     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70223-5     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bogle W and Hsu YS. Sample size determination in comparing two population variances with paired-data: Application to bilirubin tests. Biometrical Journal, 44: 594-602, 2002.
2. Carpenter J and Bithell J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Statistics in Medicine, 19: 1141-1164, 2000.
3. Fischer MH. The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex, 42: 1066-1068, 2006.
4. Fischer MH and Hill RA. SNARC in the dark: Input modality affects number representation. 22nd European Workshop of Cognitive Neuropsychology, in Bressanone, Italy, 26-31 January 2004.
5. Keus IM and Schwarz W. Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin. Memory and Cognition, 33: 681-695, 2005.
6. Nuerk H-C, Iversen W and Willmes K. Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (Linguistic Markedness Association of Response Codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A, 57: 835-863, 2004.
7. Nuerk H-C, Wood G and Willmes K. The universal SNARC effect: The association between number magnitude and space is amodal. Experimental Psychology, 52: 187-194, 2005.
8. Schwarz W and Keus IM. Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 66: 651-664, 2004.
9. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30: 276-315, 1969.
10. Wood G, Nuerk H-C and Willmes K. Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: A failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993). Cortex, 42: 1078-1088, 2006.