Proposal of a performance measurement system for the evaluation of scheduling solutions

International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management

Volumn 8, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 248-263

  Cavalieri, Sergio ^a   Terzi, Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Performance measurement; Plant management; Scheduling evaluation

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; DECISION MAKING; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PLANT MANAGEMENT; SCHEDULING;

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT; PERFORMANCE METRICS; SCHEDULING EVALUATION;

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH;

EID: 33845626540     PISSN: 13682148     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/ijmtm.2006.008803     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ali, S., Maciejewski, A.A., Siegel, H.J. and Kim, J-K. (2003) 'Definition of a robustness metric for resource allocation', Proceedings of the 17th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2003), Nice, France, 22-26 April.
2. Aytug, H., Lawley, M.A., McKay, K., Mohan, S. and Uzsoy, R. (2005) 'Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: a review and some directions', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 161, pp.86-110.
3. Bongaerts, L., Indrayadi, Y., Van Brussel, H. and Valckenaers, P. (1999) 'Predictability of Hierarchical, Heterarchical, and Holonic Control', Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Leuven, Belgium, 22-24 September, pp.167-176.
4. Brambilla, P. (2003) Proposal of a Performance Measurement System for the Evaluation of Scheduling Solutions, M.Sc. Thesis, Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Italy.
5. Caridi, M. and Cavalieri, S. (2004) 'Multi-agent systems in production planning and control: an overview', Production Planning and Control, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 106-118.
6. Cavalieri, S., Taisch, M., Garetti, M. and Macchi, M. (2000) 'An experimental benchmarking of two multi-agent systems for production scheduling and control', Computers in Industry, Vol. 43, pp.139-152.
7. Cha, Y., Cho, S. and Jung, M. (2001) 'Satisfaction Assessment of Production Schedules using Extended TOPSIS', Proceedings of The 16th International Conference on Production Research, Prague, Czech Republic, paper No. 217, 29 July-3 August.
8. Church, L.K. and Uzsoy, R. (1992) 'Analysis of periodic and event driven rescheduling policies in dynamic shops', International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 5, pp.153-163.
9. Daniels, R. and Kouvelis, P. (1995) 'Robust scheduling to hedge against processing time uncertainty in single stage production', Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp.363-376.
10. Gören, S. (2002) Robustness and Stability for Scheduling Policies in a Single Machine Environment, M.Sc. Thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
11. IMS-NoE (2005) 'Network of excellence on intelligent manufacturing systems', Project reference IST-2001-65001 IMS-02006, Available at: www.ims-noe.org.
12. Jensen, M.T. (2001) Robust and Flexible Scheduling with Evolutionary Computation, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
13. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992) 'The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance', Harvard Business Review, pp.71-79.
14. Kempf, K., Uzsoy, R., Smith, S. and Gary, K. (2000) 'Evaluation and comparison of production schedules', Computers in Industry, Vol. 42, pp.203-220.
15. Kim, G., Park, C.S. and Yoon, K.P. (1997) 'Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing system with comparative-integrated performance measurement', International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 50, pp.23-33.
16. Liu, C.K. (1998) 'Dispatching rules for stochastic finite capacity scheduling', Computers and Industrial Engineering, No. 1, pp.113-116.
17. Mignon, D.J., Honkomp, S.J. and Reklaitis, G.V. (1995) 'Framework for investigating schedule robustness under uncertainty', Computers in Chemical Engineering, Vol. 19, Suppl., PP.S615-S620.
18. Nagi, K. (2001) 'Scalability of a transactional infrastructure for multi-agent systems' T. Wagner and O.F. Rana (Eds). Infrastructure for Agents, LNAI 1887, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp.266-278.
19. Ouelhadj, D., Cowling, P. and Petrovic, S. (2003) 'Utility and stability measures for agent-based dynamic scheduling of steel continuous casting', Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, 14-19 September.
20. Pinedo, M. (1995) Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms and Systems, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Reklaitis, G.V. (2000) 'Overview of Planning and Scheduling Technologies', Latin American Applied Research, Vol. 30, pp.285-293.
22. Supply-Chain Council (2004) Supply Chain Operations Reference Model -SCOR Version 6.0, Supply Chain Council, Pittsburgh, PA.
23. Terzi, S., Brambilla, P. and Cavalieri, S. (2003) 'Evaluation and validation of scheduling systems: issues and trends', Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Performance Measurement, Dalmine, Italy, 19 and 20 June, pp.155-168.
24. Vieira, G.E., Herrmann, J.W. and Edward, L. (2003) 'Rescheduling manufacturing systems: a framework of strategies, policies and methods', Journal of Scheduling, No. 6, pp.39-62.