GGE-Biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trials in bread wheat

Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 325-337

  Kaya, Yüksel ^a   Akçura, Mevlüt ^a   Taner, Seyfi ^a  

^a Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Institute   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bread wheat (T. stivum L.); GGE biplot analysis; Multi environment yield trials

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

BIPLOT ANALYSIS; BREAD WHEAT; GENOTYPES; MULTI-ENVIRONMENT YIELD TRIALS;

GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT);

CULTIVAR; GENOTYPE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RAINFED AGRICULTURE; WHEAT; YIELD;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 33845605455     PISSN: 1300011X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/tar-0604-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Braun, H.J., W.H. Preiffer and W.G. Pollmer. 1992. Environments for selecting widely adapted spring wheat. Crop Sci. 32: 1420-1427.
2. Braun, H.J., S. Rajaram and M. van Ginkel. 1996. CIMMYT's approach to breeding for wide adaptation. Euphytica 92: 175-183.
3. Çakmak, I., M. Kalayci, H. Ekiz, H.J. Braun, Y. Kilinç and A. Yilmaz. 1999. Zinc deficiency as a practical problem in plant and human nutrition in Turkey: A NATO-science for stability project. Field Crops Res. 60: 175-188.
4. Cooper, M., D.E. Byth, I.H. DeLacy and D.R. Woodruff. 1993. Predicting grain yield in Australian environments using data from CIMMYT international wheat performance trials. I. Potential for exploiting correlated response to selection. Field Crops Res. 32: 305-322.
5. Cooper, M and I.H. Delacy. 1994. Relationships among analytic methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 561-572.
6. Cooper, M., R.E. Stucker, I.H. DeLacy and B.D. Harch. 1997. Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Sci. 37: 1168-1176.
7. Gabriel, K. R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453-467.
8. Gauch, G.H and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Interpreting mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37: 311-326.
9. Matus-Cadiz, M.A., P. Hucl, C. E. Perron and R. T. Tyler. 2003. Genotype × environment interaction for grain color in hard white spring wheat. Crop Sci. 43: 219-226.
10. Samonte, S.O.P.B., L.T. Wilson, A.M. McClung and J.C. Medley. 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis. Crop Sci. 45: 2414-2424.
11. Voltas, J., F. van Eeuwjk, E. Igartua, L.F. Garcia del Moral, J.L. Molina-Cano and I. Romagosa. 2002. Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: basic concepts and methods of analysis. In: Barley science recent advances from molecular biology to agronomy of yield and quality (Eds.: G.A. Slaver, J.L. Molina-Cano, R. Savin, J.L. Araus and I. Romagosa). The Haworth Press, NY, pp.205-241.
12. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40: 597-605.
13. Yan, W and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41: 19-25.
14. Yan, W., P.L. Cornelius, J. Crossa and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Sci. 41: 656-663.
15. Yan, W. 2002. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multienvironment trial data. Agron. J. 94: 990-996.
16. Yan, W and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42: 11-20.