People who judge people

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 441-454

  Weiss, David J ^a   Shanteau, James ^b   Harries, Priscilla ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical judgment; Expertise; Prioritization; Professional performance assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845601215     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.529     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Shanteau, J. (1992). Personal characteristics of expert auditors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 158-172.
2. Anderson, N. H. (1972). Looking for configurality in clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 93-102.
3. Ashton, A. H. (1985). Does consensus imply accuracy in accounting studies of decision making? Accounting Review, 60, 173-185.
4. Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (1992). Reliability and validity in expert judgment. In G. Wright, & F. Bolger (Eds.), Expertise and decision support (pp. 47-76). New York: Plenum Press.
5. Cochran, W. G. (1943). The comparison of different scales of measurement for experimental results. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14, 205-216.
6. Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and application. New York: Academic Press.
7. Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582.
8. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. M. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95-106.
9. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
10. Einhorn, H. J. (1972). Expert measurement and mechanical combination. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7, 86-106.
11. Einhorn, H. J. (1974). Expert judgment: some necessary conditions and an example. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 562-571.
12. Gardner, M. (1957). Fads and fallacies in the name of science. New York: Dover.
13. Goldberg, L. R. (1968). Simple models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments. American Psychologist, 23, 482-496.
14. Goldberg, L. R., & Werts, C. E. (1966). The reliability of clinicians' judgments: A multitrait-multimethod approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 199-206.
15. Grubbs, F. E. (1973). Errors of measurement, precision, accuracy and the statistical comparison of measuring instruments. Technometrics, 15, 53-66.
16. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Harries, P. A. (2004). Occupational therapists' judgement of referral priorities: Expertise and training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brunel University, West London, England.
18. Holt, R. R. (1961). Clinical judgment as a disciplined inquiry. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 133, 389-382.
19. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
20. Kahneman, D. (2003). Experiences of collaborative research. American Psychologist, 58, 723-730.
21. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22. Nagy, G. F. (1981). How are personnel selection decisions made? An analysis of decision strategies in a simulated personnel selection task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
23. Oskamp, S. (1962). The relationship of clinical experience and training methods to several criteria of clinical prediction. Psychological Monograph, 76 (28, Whole No. 547), 1962, p. 27.
24. Payton, M. E., Greenstone, M. H., & Schenker, N. (2003). Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: what do they mean in terms of statistical significance? Journal of Insect Science, 3:34 6p. Available online at insectscience.org/3:34.
25. Phelps, R. H. (1977). Expert livestock judgment: A descriptive analysis of the development of expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
26. Pledge, H. T. (1959). Science since 1500. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
27. Russell, B. (1993). Sceptical essays. London: Routledge.
28. Shanteau, J. (1999). Decision making by experts: the GNAHM effect. In J. Shanteau, B. Mellers, & D. Schum (Eds.), Decision research from Bayes to normative systems: Reflections on the contributions of Ward Edwards. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Shanteau, J. (2001). What does it mean when experts disagree? In E. Salas, & G. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 229-244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Shanteau, J., & Nagy, G. F. (1984). Information integration in person perception: Theory and application. In M. Cook (Ed.), Issues in person perception (pp. 48-86). London: Methuen.
31. Skånér, Y., Strender, L., & Bring, J. (1998). How do GPs use clinical information in the judgements of heart failure? Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 16, 95-100.
32. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York: Doubleday & Company.
33. Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1-26.
34. Uebersax, J. S. (1993). Statistical modeling of expert ratings on medical treatment appropriateness. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 421-427.
35. Uebersax, J. S., & Grove, W. M. (1990). Latent class analysis of diagnostic agreement. Statistics in Medicine, 9, 559-572.
36. Uebersax, J. S., & Grove, W. M. (1993). A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement. Biometrics, 49, 823-835.
37. Weiss, D. J., & Edwards, W. (2005). A mean for all seasons. Behavior Research, Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 37, 677-683.
38. Weiss, D. J., & Shanteau, J. (2000). Consensus: The hobgoblin of little minds. Paper presented at the OK Judgment and Decision Making Meeting, Oklahoma City, OK.
39. Weiss, D. J., & Shanteau, J. (2003). Empirical assessment of expertise. Human Factors, 45, 104-116.
40. Weiss, D. J., & Shanteau, J. (2004). The vice of consensus and the virtue of consistency. In C. Smith, J. Shanteau, & P. Johnson (Eds.), Psychological investigations of competent decision making (pp. 226-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.