Resource-dependent giving-up time of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis

Journal of Insect Behavior

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 741-752

  Nachappa, Punya ^a   Margolies, David C ^a   Nechols, James R ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feeding experience; Herbivore induced plant volatiles; Resident time; Tetranychus urticae

Indexed keywords

ACARI; PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS; TETRANYCHUS URTICAE;

EID: 33845599451     PISSN: 08927553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-006-9059-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bernstein, C. (1983). Some aspects of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) dispersal behavior. Entomophaga 28: 185-198.
2. Bernstein, C. (1984). Prey and predator emigration responses in the acarine system Phytoseiulus persimilis-Tetranychus urticae. Oecologia 61: 134-142.
3. Dicke, M., van Beek, T. A., Posthumus, M. A., Ben Dom, N., van Bokhoven, H., and de Groot, A. E. (1990a). Isolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator-prey interactions: involvement of host plant in its production. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 381-396.
4. Dicke, M., Sabelis, M. W., Takabayashi, J., Bruin, J., and Posthumus, M. A. (1990b). Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelochemicals: prospects for application in pest control. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 3091-3118.
5. Eveleigh, E. S., and Chant, D. A. (1982). Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey interactions: The response of predators to prey distribution in a homogeneous area (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 60: 639-647.
6. Fernando, M. H. J. P., and Hassell, M. P. (1980). Predator-prey responses in acarine system. Researches on Pop. Ecol. 22: 301-322.
7. Hopper, K. R., Roush, R. T., and Powell, W. (1993). Management of genetics of biologicalcontrol introductions. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 38: 27-51.
8. Janssen, A. (1999). Plants with spider-mite prey attract more predatory mites than clean plants under greenhouse conditions. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 90: 191-198.
9. Janssen, A., Bruin, J., Jacobs, G., Schraag, R., and Sabelis, M. W. (1997). Predators use volatiles to avoid prey patches with conspecifics. J. Animal Ecol. 66: 223-232.
10. Jia, F., Margolies, D. C., Boyer, J. E. Jr., and Charlton, R. E. (2002). Genetic variation among foraging traits in inbred lines of a predatory mite. Heredity 88: 371-379.
11. Lewis, W. J., and Martin, W. R. Jr. (1990). Semiochemicals for use with parasitoids: Status and future. J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 3067-3089.
12. Lewis, W. J., Vet, L. E. M., Tumlinson, J. H., van Lenteren, J. C., and Papaj, D. R. (1990). Variations in parasitoid foraging behavior: Essential element of a sound biological control theory. Environ. Entomol. 19: 1183-1193.
13. Maeda, T., Takabayashi, J., Yano, S., and Takafuji, A. (1998). Factors affecting the resident time of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in a prey patch. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 33: 573-576.
14. Maeda, T., and Takabayashi, J. (2001). Patch leaving decision of the predatory mite Amblyseius womersleyi (Acari: Phytoseiidae) based on multiple signals form both inside and outside a prey patch. J. Insect Behav. 14: 829-839.
15. Maeda, T., and Takabayashi, J. (2005). Effect of foraging experiences on residence time of the predatory mite Neoseiulus womersleyi in a prey patch. J. Insect Behav. 18: 323-333.
16. Margolies, D. C., Boyer, J. E. Jr., Sabelis, M. W. (1997). Response of a phytoseiid predator to herbivore-induced plant volatiles: selection on attraction and effect on prey exploitation. J. Insect Behav. 10: 715-729.
17. Mayland, H. J. (1998). Effects of prey-induced plant volatiles on search behaviors of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis. M.S. Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, p. 63.
18. Mayland, H., Margolies, D. C., and Charlton, R. E. (2000). Local and distant prey-related cues influence when an acarine predator leaves a patch. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96: 245-252.
19. Pels, B., de Roos, A. M., and Sabelis, M. W. (2002). Evolutionary dynamics of prey exploitation in a metapopulation of predators. Am. Nat. 159: 172-189.
20. Sabelis, M. W., Vermaat, J. E., and Groeneveld, A. (1984). Arrestment responses of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis, to steep odour gradients of kairomones. Physiol. Entomol. 9: 437-446.
21. Sabelis, M. W., and Afman, B. P. (1994). Synomone - induced suppression of take-off in the phytoseiid mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 18: 711-721.
22. Sabelis, M. W., and Dicke, M. (1985). Long-range dispersal and searching behavior. In Helle, W. and Sabelis, M. W. (eds.), Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 141-159.
23. Sabelis, M. W., and Van Der Meer, J. J. (1986). Local dynamics of the interaction between predatory mites and two-spotted spider mites. In Metz, J. A. J., and Diekmann, O. (eds.), Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations, Springer, Berlin, pp. 322-344.
24. Sabelis, M. W., and Van Der Weel, J. J. (1993). Anemotactic responses of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and their role in prey finding. Exp. Appl Acarol. 17: 521-529.
25. SAS Institute (2001). SAS user's guide: statistics, version 8.2 SAS Institute, Cary NC.
26. Stephens, D. W., and Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p. 247.
27. Takafuji, A. (1977). The effect of the rate of successful dispersal of a phytoseiid mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on the persistence in the interactive system between the predator and its prey. Res. Popul. Ecol. 18: 210-222.
28. Takafuji, A., and Chant, D. A. (1976). Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their response to the density of their prey. Res. Popul. Ecol. 17: 255-310.
29. Takafuji, A., Tsuda, Y., and Mori, T. (1983). System behaviour in predator-prey interaction, with special reference to acarine predator-prey systems. Res. Popul. Ecol. Suppl. 3: 75-92.
30. Tumlinson, J. H. (1988). Contemporary frontiers in insect semiochemical research. J. Chem. Ecol. 14: 2109-2130.
31. van Lenteren, J. C., and Woets, J. (1988). Biological and integrated pest control in greenhouses. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 33: 239-269.
32. Vanas, V., Enigl, E., Walzer, A., and Schausberger, P. (2006). The predatorymite Phytoseiulus persimilis adjusts patch-leaving to own and progeny needs. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 39: 1-11.
33. Vet, L. E. M., and Dicke, M. (1992). Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 37: 141-172.
34. Waage, J. K. (1979). Foraging for patchily-distributed hosts by the parasitoid. Nemeritis canescens. J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 353-371.
35. Zhang, Z.-Q., Sanderson, J. P., and Nyrop, J. P. (1992). Foraging time and spatial patterns of predation in experimental populations. Oecologia. 90: 185-196.
36. Zemek, R., and Nachman, G. (1998). Interactions in a tritrophic acarine predator-prey metapopulation system: prey location and distance moved by Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 22: 259-278.