Genetic variation in foraging traits among inbred lines of a predatory mite

Heredity

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 371-379

  Jia, F ^a   Margolies, D C ^a   Boyer, J E ^a   Charlton, R E ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumption and oviposition; Foraging behaviors; Herbivore induced plant volatiles; Patch location; Patch residence; Phytoseiulus persimilis

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CUE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC VARIATION; MITE; PREY LOCATION;

EGG LAYING; FOOD INTAKE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INBRED STRAIN; LEAF DISK ASSAY; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PREDATION; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CROSS BREEDING; FEMALE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; INBREEDING; LEGUME; MEDICINAL PLANT; METABOLISM; MITE; PARASITOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; POPULATION DYNAMICS; VOLATILIZATION;

ACARI; PHYTOSEIIDAE; PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS;

PHEROMONE;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CROSSES, GENETIC; FABACEAE; FEMALE; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; INBREEDING; MITES; OVIPOSITION; PHENOTYPE; PHEROMONES; PLANT LEAVES; PLANTS, MEDICINAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; VARIATION (GENETICS); VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 0036859234     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800145     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Becker WA (1984). Manual of Quantiative Genetics, 4th Edn. Academic Enterprises: Pullman, WA.
2. Bjornson S, Keddie BA (1999). Effect of Microsporidium phytoseiuli (Microsporidia) on the performance of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biolog Cont 15: 153-161.
3. Bruins EBA, Wajnberg E, Pak GA (1994). Genetic variability in the reactive distance in Trichogramma brassicae after automatic tracking of the walking path. Entomol Exp Apl 72: 297-303.
4. Dicke M, Sabelis MW (1988). How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguards. Neth J Zool 38: 148-165.
5. Dicke M, Dabelis MW (1989). Does it pay plants to advertize for bodybuards? In: Lambers H, Cambridge ML, Konings H, Pons TL (eds) Causes and Consequencs of Variation in Growth Rate and the Productivity of Higher Plants, SPB Academic Publishing: The Hague. pp. 341-358.
6. Dicke M, Sabelis MW, Takabayashi J, Bruin J, Posthumus MA (1990a). Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelochemicals: Prospects for application in pest control. J Chem Ecol 16: 3091-3118.
7. Dicke M, Van Beek TA, Posthumus MA, Ben Doom N, Van Bokhoven H, De Groot AE (1990b). Isolationand identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator-prey interactions: Involvement of host plant in its production. J Chem Ecol 16: 381-396.
8. Falconer DS (1983). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd Edn. Longman: New York.
9. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th Edn. Longman: New York.
10. Gu H, Dorn S (2000). Genetic variation in behavioral response to herbivore-infested plants in the parasitic wasp, Cotesia glomerata (L.) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Insect Behavior 13: 141-156.
11. Hopper KR, Roush RT, Powell W (1993). Management of genetics of biological-control introductions. Ann Re Entomol 38: 29-51.
12. Hoy MA (1990). Genetic improvement of anthropod natural enemies: Becoming a conventional tactic? In: Baker RR, Dunn PE (eds) New Directions in Biological Control, Alan R. Liss Inc: New York. pp 405-417.
13. Janssen A (1999). Plants with spider-mite prey attract more predatory mites than clean plants under greenhouse conditions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90: 191-198.
14. Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS (1996). The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman and Hall: London.
15. Lewis WJ, Martin Jr WR (1990). Semiochemicals for use with parasitoids: Status and future. J Chem Ecol 16: 3067-3089.
16. Lewis WJ, Nordlund DA (1985). Behavior-modifying chemicals to enhance natural enemy effectiveness. In: Hoy MA, Herzog DC (eds) Biological Control in Agricultural IPM Systems, Academic Press: Orlando, FL. pp 89-101.
17. Mackauer, M (1976). Genetic problems in the production of biological control agents. Ann Rev Entomol 21: 369-383.
18. Maeda T, Takabayashi J, Yano S, Takafuji A (1999). Response of the predatory mite, Amblyseius womersleyi (Acari: Phytoseiidae), toward herbivore-induced plant volatiles: Variation in response between two local populations. App Entomol Zoo 34: 449-454.
19. Mankin RW, Vick KW, Mayer MS, Coffelt JA, Callahan PS (1980). Models for dispersal of vapors inopen and confined spaces: Application to sex pheromone trapping in a warehouse. J Chem Ecol 6: 929-925.
20. Margolies DC, Boyer Jr JE, Sabelis MW (1997). Response of a phytoseiid predator to herbivore-induced plant volatiles: Selection on attaction and effecy on prey exploitation. J Insect Behav 10: 715-729.
21. Mayland H (1998). Effects of Pre-induced Plant Volatiles on Search Behaviors of the Predatory Ite, Phytoseiulus Persimilis. Master Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
22. Mayland H, Margolies DC, Charlton RE (2000). Multiple prey-related cues influence residence time of an acarine predator, Phytoseiulus persimilis, on prey host plants. Entomol Exp Apl 96: 245-252.
23. Parsons PA (1980). Isofemale strains and evolutionary strategies in natural populations. Evol Bio 13: 175-217.
24. Parsons PA (1983). The Evolutionary Biology of Colonizing Species. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England.
25. Pels B, Sabelis MW (1999). Local dynamics, overexploitation and predator dispersal in an acarine predator-prey sysem. Oikos 86: 573-583.
26. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980). Interactions among three trophic levels: Influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11: 41-65.
27. Rockwell RF, Cooke F, Harmsen R (1975). Photobehavioral differentiation in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Behav Genet 5: 189-202.
28. Rosen D, Huffaker CB (1983). An overview of desired attributes of effective viological control agents, with particular emphasis on mites. In: Hoy MA, Cunningham GL, Knutson L (eds), Biological Control of Pests by Mites, University of California: Berkeley. pp 2-11.
29. Sabelis MW (1981). Biological control of two-spotted spider mite using phytoseiid predators. Part I: Modelling the Predator-Prey Interaction at the Individual Level. Agricultural Research Reports 910, Pudoc, Wageningen, Netherlands. 242 pp.
30. Sabelis MW (1985). Reproduction and sex allocation. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control Vol. 1B, Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam. pp 73-94.
31. Sabelis MW,Van der Weel JJ (1993). Anemotactic responses of the predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot, and their role in prey finding. Exp Appl Acarol 17: 521-529.
32. Sabelis MW, Vermaat JE, Groeneveld A (1984). Arrestment responses of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis, to steep odour gradients of kariomones. Physiol Entomol 9: 437-446.
33. Schutte C, Van Baarlen P, Dijkman H, Dicke M (1998). Change in foraging behaviour of the predatory mice Phytoseiulus persimilis after exposure to dead conspecifics and their products. Entomol Exp Appl 88: 295-300.
34. Van Baalen M, Sabelis MW (1995). The milker-killer dilemma in spatially structured predator-prey interactions. Oikos 74: 391-400.
35. Van Lenteren JC, Woets J (1988). Biological and integrated pest control in greenhouses. Am Rev Entomol 33: 239-269.
36. Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992). Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Ann Rev Entomol 37: 141-172.
37. Zemek R, Nachman G (1998). Interactions in a tritrophic acarine predator-prey metapopulation system: Prey location and distance moved by Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 22: 259-278.