Increasing human-organ transplant availability: Argumentation-based agent deliberation

IEEE Intelligent Systems

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 30-37

  Tolchinsky, Pancho ^a   Cortés, Ulises ^a   Modgil, Sanjay ^b   Caballero, Francisco ^c   López Navidad, Antonio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^c HOSPITAL DE LA SANTA CREU I SANT PAU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; TISSUE;

AGENT BASED ARCHITECTURE; HEALTHCARE TRANSPLANT ORGANIZATIONS; ORGAN ALLOCATION; TISSUE ALLOCATION;

TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

EID: 33845593304     PISSN: 15411672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2006.116     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. J. Vázquez-Salceda et al., "The Organ Allocation Process: A Natural Extension of the Carrel Agent-Mediated Electronic Institution," AI Comm., vol. 16, no. 3, 2003, pp. 153-165.
2. U. Cortés et al, "UCTx: A Multi-agent Approach to Model a Transplant Coordination Unit," J. Applied Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 1, 2004, pp. 59-70.
3. M. Calisti et al., "A Multi-Agent System for Organ Transplant Management," Applications of Software Agent Technology in the Health Care Domain, Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technologies, 2003, pp. 199-212.
4. A. Moreno, A. Valls, and J. Bocio, "Management of Hospital for Organ Transplants Using Multi-Agent Systems," Proc. 8th Conf. AI in Medicine in Europe (AIME 01), 2001, pp. 374-383.
5. Activitat de Donació i Trasplantament a Catalunya, [Donor and Transplant Activity in Catalunya], Organització Catalana de Trasplantaments, 2005; www10.gencat.net/catsalut/ocatt/pdfs/ Informe_donacio_2004-05.pdf.
6. A. López-Navidad and F. Caballero, "Extended Criteria for Organ Acceptance: Strategies for Achieving Organ Safety and for Increasing Organ Pool," Clinical Transplantation, vol. 17, no. 4, 2003, pp. 308-324.
7. F. Caballero et al., "Successful Liver and Kidney Transplantation from Cadaveric Donors with Left-sided Bacterial Endocarditis," American J. Transplantation, vol. 5, no. 4, 2005, pp. 781-787.
8. P. Tolchinsky et al., "CBR and Argument Schemes for Collaborative Decision Making," Computational Models of Argument: Proc. COMMA 2006, IOS Press, vol. 144, 2006, pp. 71-82.
9. D.N. Walton, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
10. P. Tolchinsky, S. Modgil and U. Cortés, Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for Heterogeneous Agents to Argue over the Viability of a Human Organ, tech. report SS-06-01, AAAI Press, 2006.
11. S. Modgil, P. Tolchinsky, and U. Cortés, "Towards Formalizing Agent Argumentation over the Viability of Human Organs for Transplantation, " Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 4th Mexican Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence (MICAI 05), LNCS 3789, Springer, 2005, pp. 928-938.
12. P.M. Dung, "On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and N-Person Games," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 77, no. 2, 1995, pp. 321-357.
13. K.M. Atkinson, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, and P. McBurney, "A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument for Proposals over Action," Proc. 1st Int'l Workshop Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 04), LNCS 3366, Springer, 2004, pp. 149-161.
14. R. Cooper, Modeling High-Level Cognitive Process, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.