Towards formalising agent argumentation over the viability of human organs for transplantation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3789 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 928-938

  Modgil, Sanjay ^a   Tolchinsky, Pancho ^b   Cortés, Ulises ^b  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT ARGUMENTATION; CARREL SYSTEM; DONOR'S ORGAN;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; MEDICAL IMAGING; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646797413     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11579427_95     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. K. M. Atkinson, T. J. M. Bench-Capon, and P. McBurney. A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument for proposals over action. In Proc. First International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2004), 2004.
2. M. Caminada and L. Amgoud. An axiomatic account of formal argumentation. In Proceedings of the AAAI-2005, 2005.
3. U. Cortés, J. Vázquez-Salceda, A. López-Navidad, and F. Caballero. UCTx: a multi-agent approach to model a transplant coordination unit. In Proceedings of the 3rd. Congrés Català dIntelligència Artificial, 2000.
4. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
5. M. Esteva, D. de la Cruz, and C. Sierra. Islander: an electronic institutions editor. In AAMAS. ACM, 2002.
6. A.J. Garcia and G.R. Simari. Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(1):95-138, 2004.
7. A. Löpez-Navidad and F. Caballero. Extended criteria for organ acceptance: Strategies for achieving organ safety and for increasing organ pool. Clin Transplant, Blackwell Munksgaard, 17:308-324, 2003.
8. OCATT. Organització Catalana de Transplantaments (OCATT). http://www10.gencat.net/catsalut/ocatt/en/htm/index.htm.
9. ONT. Organización Nacional de Transplantes, http://www.msc.es/ont.
10. S. Parsons, M. Wooldridge, and L. Amgoud. On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2003), 2003.
11. J. L. Pollock. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11:481-518, 1987.
12. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7:25-75, 1997.
13. H. Prakken and G. Vreeswijk. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, second edition, chapter Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
14. G.R. Simari and R.P. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125-157, 1992.
15. P. Tolchinsky and U. Cortés. Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for deciding upon the Viability of a Human Organ for transplantation. Technical report, Technical University Of Catalonia, 2005. http://www.lsi.upc. edu/~tolchinsky/sch-list.pdf.
16. P. Tolchinsky, U. Cortés, J.C. Nieves, F. Caballero, and A. López-Navidad. Using arguing agents to increase the human organ pool for transplantation. In 3rd Workshop on Agents Applied in Health Care (IJCAI-05), 2005.
17. J. Vázquez-Salceda, U. Cortés, J. Padget, A. López-Navidad, and F. Caballero. The organ allocation process: a natural extension of the CARREL Agent-Mediated Electronic Institution. AiCommunications. The European Journal on Artificial Intelligence, 3(16), 2003.
18. D. N. Wallon. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1996.