Evaluation models for the effect of sample imbalance on gene selection

First International Multi- Symposiums on Computer and Computational Sciences, IMSCCS'06

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 56-63

  Yang, Kun ^a   Li, Jianzhong ^a   Wang, Chaokun ^b   Gao, Hong ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; EVALUATION; GENES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SAMPLING;

EVALUATION MODELS; GENE SELECTION METHODS; MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS; RANDOM SAMPLING;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 33845589432     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IMSCCS.2006.59     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. M. Schene, et al. Quantitive monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science, 27: 467-470, 1995.
2. T. R. Golub, et al. Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring. Science, 286: 531-537, 1999.
3. E. F. Petricoin in, J. L. Hackett, L. J. Lesko, R. K. Puri, S. I. Gutman, K. Chumakov, J. Woodcock, D. W. Feigal Jr., K. C. Zoon and F. D. Sistare. Medical applications of microarray technologies: a regulatory science perspective. Nature Genetics, 32 supplement: 474-479, 2002.
4. J. D. Storey and R. Tibshirani. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Nad. Acad. Sci. USA. 100(16): 9440-9445, 2003.
5. X. Cui and G. A. Churchill. Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments. Genome Biology, 4:120, 2003.
6. S. Mukherjee and S. J. Roberts. A Theoretical Analysis of Gene Selection. In: IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, 2004.
7. M. J. Callow, S. Dudoit, E. L. Gong, T. P. Speed, E. M. Rubin, Microarray expression profiling identifies genes with altered expression in HDL-deficient mice. Genome Research, 10: 2022-2029, 2000.
8. P. Baldi and A. D. Long, A Bayesian Framework for the Analysis of Microarray Expression Data: Regularized t-test and Statistical Inferences of Gene Changes. Bioinformatics, 17(6): 509-519, 2001.
9. L. Hunter, et al, GEST: a gene expression search tool based on a novel Bayesian similarity metric. Bioinformatics, 17 Suppl 1: S115-S122, 2001.
10. O. G. Troyanskaya, et al. Nonparametric methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data. Bioinformatics, 18(11): 1454-1461, 2002.
11. V. G. Tusher, R. Tibshirani, G. Chu, Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98(9): 5116-5121, 2001.
12. B. Efron, R. Tibshirani, J. D. Storey and V. Tusher, Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96:1151C1160, 2001.
13. W. Pan, J. Lin and T. L. Chap, A mixture model approach to detecting differentially expressed genes with microarray data. Funct Integr Genomics, 3:117C124, 2003.
14. S. Dudoit, J. Fridlyand and T. P. Speed, Comparison of Discrimination Methods for the Classification of Tumors Using Gene Expression Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(457):77-87, 2002.
15. R. E. Walpole and R. H. Myers, Probability and statistics for engineers and Scientists. 5th edition, Macmillan Publishing, 1993.
16. W. G. Cochran, Sampling Techniques. Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.
17. J. Lapointe, C. Li, et al, Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101(3):811-816, 2004.
18. X. Chen, S. T. Cheung, et al, Gene Expression Patterns in Human Liver Cancers. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 13:1929-1939, 2002.