Insights into modeling functional trajectories for robot-mediated daily living exercise environments

Proceedings of the First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006, BioRob 2006

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 99-104

  Wisneski, Kimberly J ^a,b   Johnson, Michelle J ^a,b,c  

^a Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University   (United States)

^b VA Zablocki hospital   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional tasks; Modeling; Neuro rehabilitation; Robotics; Trajectory planning

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; MOBILE ROBOTS; MOTION PLANNING; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; ROBOT PROGRAMMING; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING EXERCISE ROBOT (ADLER); FUNCTIONAL TASKS; NEURO REHABILITATION; TRAJECTORY PLANNING;

TRAJECTORIES;

EID: 33845562404     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BIOROB.2006.1639067     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. B.T. Volpe, H.I. Krebs, et al., "Robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation." Adv Neurol, vol. 92, pp 429-433, 2002.
2. B.T. Volpe, M. Ferraro, H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan, "Robotics in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with stroke." Curr Atheroscler Rep, vol. 4, no.4, pp. 270-276, 2002.
3. H.I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe, et al., "Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: from evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation," Top Stroke Rehabil, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 54-70, 2002.
4. R. Lui, H.W. Amirabdollahian, "A Gentle/s Approach to Robot Assisted Neuro-Rehabilitation." Eds. Z Bien and D. Stefanov. In Advances in Rehabilitation Robotics: Human Friendly Technologies on Movement Assistance and Restoration for People with Disabilities, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, no. 306, Germany, Springer, pp 347-363, 2004.
5. C.G. Burgar, P.S., Lum, P.C. Shor, H.F.M. Van der Loos, "Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience," J Rehabil Res Dev, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 663-674, 2000.
6. P. Lum, D, Reinkensmeyer, R. Mahoney, W.Z. Rymer, C. Burgar, "Robotic Devices for movement therapy after stroke: Current status and challenges to clinical acceptance," Top Stroke Rehabil, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 40-53, 2002.
7. P. Bach-y-Rita, "Theoretical and practical considerations in the restoration of function after stroke," J Top Stroke Rehabil vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1-15, 2001.
8. C. Trombly, M.A. Hui-ing, "A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke, Part I: Restoration of roles, tasks, and activities," Am J Occup Ther, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 250-259, 2002.
9. C. Trombly, Occupational Therapy of Physical Dysfunction. Trombly C, editor. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
10. C. Wu, C.A. Trombly, K. Lin, et al., "A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: Influences of object availability." Arch Phys Med Rehabil vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 95-101, 2000.
11. C. Wu, C.A. Trombly, K. Lin, L. Ticke-Degnen., "Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident." Am J Occup Ther 1998.
12. M. Johnson, K. Wisneski, "Development of ADLER: The Activites of Daily Living Exercise Robot," unpublished, Submitted to BioRob 2006.
13. T. Flash, N. Hogan, "The coordination of arm movements an experimentally confirmed mathematical model," A.I. Memo, vol. 786, 1984.
14. F. Amirabdollahian, R, Loureiro, W. Harwin, "Minimum Jerk Tajectory Control for Rehabilitation and Haptic Applications," The Humand Interface Laboratory Department of Cybernetics, The University of Reading.
15. B.A. Hingtgen, J.R. McGuire, M. Wang, G.F. Harris, "Design and validation of an upper extremity kinematic model for application in strok rehabilitation."Proceedings IEEE/EMBS, vol. 25, pp. 200, 2003.
16. P. Bach-y-Rita, "Late post-acute neurologic rehabilitation: neuroscience, engineering and clinical programs," Arch Phys. Med. Rehab, vol. 84, pp. 1100-1108, 2003.
17. G.F. Wittenberg, et al, "Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation.," Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 48-57, 2003.
18. J. Liepert, H. Bauder, W.H.R. Miltner, E. Taub, C. Weiller, "Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans.," Stroke, vol. 31, pp. 1210-1216, 2002.
19. G.T. Thielman, C.M. Dean, A.M. Gentile, "Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task related training versus progressive resistive exercise.," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 85, pp. 1613-1618, 2004.
20. K.M. Zackowski, W.T. Thach, A.J. Bastian, "Cerebellar subjects show impaired coupling of reach and grasp movements," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 146, pp. 511-522, 2002.
21. D. Timmann, G.E. Stelmach, J.R. Bloedel, "Grasping component alterations and limb transport," Exp Brain Res vol. 108, pp. 486-492, 1996.
22. A.M. Wing, A. Turton, C. Fraser "Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching," J Mot Behav, vol. 18, pp. 245-260, 1986.
23. M. Gentilucci, "Object motor representation and reaching-grasping control," Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, pp. 1139-1153, 2002.
24. C.G. Atkenson, J.M. Hollerbach, "Kinematic features of Unrestrained Arm Movements," A.I. Memo, vol. 790, paper 007, pp. 1-25, 1984.