Comparison of SVM and some older classification algorithms in text classification tasks

IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

Volumn 217, Issue , 2006, Pages 169-178

  Colas, Fabrice ^a   Brazdil, Pavel ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINARY CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION; FEATURE SPACE; NAIVE BAYES; SELECTION TECHNIQUES; TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); CLASSIFIERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; TEXT PROCESSING;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 33845519499     PISSN: 15715736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-34747-9_18     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. W. Daelemans, V. Hoste, F. D. Meulder, and B. Naudts. Combined optimization of feature selection and algorithm parameters in machine learning of language. In Proceedings of the European Conference of Machine Learning, pages 84-95, 2003.
2. S. Dumais, J. Platt, D. Heckerman, and M. Sahami. Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 148-155, 1998.
3. J. Fürnkranz. Pairwise classification as an ensemble technique. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 97-110, 2002.
4. T. Joachims. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Machines. 1998.
5. A. McCallum and K. Nigam. A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, 1998.
6. A. K. McCallum. Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/ ~mccallum/bow, 1996.
7. T. M. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997.
8. J. Platt. Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines. Technical Report 98-14, Microsoft Research, 1998.
9. M. Rogati and Y. Yang. High-performing feature selection for text classification. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 659-661, 2002.
10. Y. Yang. An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Information Retrieval, pages 69-90, 1999.
11. Y. Yang. A scalability analysis of classifiers in text categorization. In Proceedings 26th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2003.
12. Y. Yang and X. Liu. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 42-49, 1999.
13. Y. Yang and J. O. Pedersen. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 412-420, 1997.
14. T. Zhang and F. J. Oles. Text categorization based on regularized linear classification methods. Information Retrieval, pages 5-31, 2001.