Young people, pathways and crime: Beyond risk factors

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 354-370

  Kemshall, Hazel ^a   Marsland, Louise ^b   Boeck, Thilo ^a   Dunkerton, Leigh ^c  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845482518     PISSN: 00048658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/acri.39.3.354     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. Aguilera, M.B. (2002). The impact of social capital on labour force participation: Evidence from the 2000 Social Capital Benchmark Survey. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 853-874.
2. Ansell, J., & Wharton, F. (1992). Risk: Analysis, assessment and management. Chichester: John Wiley.
3. Armstrong, D. (2004). A risky business? Research, policy, governmentality and youth offending. Youth Justice, 4, 100-117.
4. Audit Commission. (1996). Missent youth ... Young people and crime. London: Author.
5. Bammer, G. (2003). Integration and implementation sciences: Will developing a new specialism improve our effectiveness in tackling complex issues? Retrieved September 19, 2003, from http://www.anu.edu.au/issn/ Posted to the Science, Environment and Development Group Website.
6. Boeck, T., Fleming, J., & Kemshall, H. (2006). The context of risk decisions: Does social capital make a difference? Qualitative Social Research. Retrived from www.qualitative-research.net/ fqs-eng.htm
7. Bloor, M. (1995). The sociology of HIV transmission. London: Sage.
8. Bottoms, A. (2000). The relationship between theory and research in criminology. In R.D. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice (pp. 15-60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Bradbury, J. (1989). The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 14, 380-399.
10. Brown, M. (2000). Calculations of risk in contemporary penal practice. In M.Brown & J.Pratt (Eds.), Dangerous offenders: Punishment and social order (pp. 93-108). London: Routledge.
11. Byrne, C.F., & Trew, K.F. (2005). Crime orientations, social relations and involvement in crime: Patterns emerging from offenders' accounts. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 185-205.
12. Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences. London: Routledge.
13. Catalano, R.F., & Hawkins, J.D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behaviour. In J.D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149-197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoreticallybased approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
15. Clarke, R.V., & Cornish, D. (1983). Crime control in Britain: A review of policy research. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16. Crook, S. (1999). Ordering risks. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory (pp. 160-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame. London: Routledge.
18. Edwards, B., & Foley, M.W. (1998). Civil society and social capital beyond Putnam. American Behavioural Scientist, 42, 124-139.
19. Elliott, D.S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S.S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. London: Sage.
20. Emler, N., & Reicher, S. (1995). Adolescence and delinquency. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking what works with offenders: Probation, social context, and resistance from crime. Cullompton: Willan.
22. Farrall, S., & Bowling, B. (1999). Structuration, human development and desistance from crime. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 252-267.
23. Farrington, D.P. (1989). The origins of crime: The Cambridge study of delinquent development. Home Office Research Bulletin 27. London: HMSO.
24. Farrington, D.P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 929-964.
25. Farrington, D.P. (2000). Explaining and preventing crime: The globalization of knowledge: The American Society of Criminology 1999 Presidential Address. Criminology, 38, 1-24.
26. Gossop, M., Griffiths, P., Powis, B., & Strang, J. (1992). Severity of dependence and route of administration of heroin, cocaine and amphetamines. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 1527-1536.
27. Graham, J., &. Bowling, B. (1996). Young people and crime. Research Study 145. London, Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate.
28. Hammersley, R., Marsland, L., & Reid, M. (2003). Substance misuse by young offenders: The impact of normalisation of drug use in the early years of the 21st century. (Home Office Research Study 261), London: Home Office.
29. Hodgson, P., & Webb, D. (2005). Young people, crime and school exclusion: A case of some surprises. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 12-28.
30. Hood, C., & Jones, D. (Eds.). (1996). Accident design: Contemporary debates in risk management. London: UCL Press.
31. Horlick-Jones, T. (1998). Meaning and contextualisation in risk assessment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 5, 79-89.
32. Jasanoff, S. (1993). Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 13, 123-129.
33. Kemshall, H. (2003). Understanding risk in criminal justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
34. Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers/Polity Press.
35. Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. London: Sage.
36. Leavitt, G. (1999). Criminological theory as an art form: Implications for criminal justice policy. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 389-399.
37. Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.
38. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, EXD: American Psychological Association.
39. MacDonald, R., & Marsh, J. (2001). Disconnected youth? Journal of Youth Studies, 4, 373-391.
40. Morrow, V. (2004). Children's 'social capital': Implications for health and well-being. Health Education, 104, 211-225.
41. Munn, P., & Lloyd, G. (2005). Exclusion and excluded pupils. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 205-221.
42. Osier, A., & Vincent, K. (2003). Girls and exclusion: Rethinking the agenda. London: Routledge Falmer.
43. Parker, H., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1998). Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational ational drug use. London: Routledge.
44. Poulin, F., Dishion, TJ., & Haas, E. (1999). The peer influence paradox: Friendship quality and deviancy training within male adolescent friendships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1, 42-61.
45. Robins, L., & Rutter, M. (1990). Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adulthood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
47. Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
48. Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
49. Sparks, R. (2001). Degrees of estrangement: The cultural theory of risk and comparative penology. Theoretical Criminology, 5, 159-176.
50. Sullivan, E. (2002). Social exclusion, social identity and social capital: Reuniting the global, the local and the personal. Discussion Paper for the Conference de l'Association Internationale des Ecoles de Travail Social, Montpelier, July.
51. Thompson, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). A proposal to create a cultural theory of risk. In H.C. Kunreuther, & E.V. & Ley (Eds.), The risk analysis controversy: An institutional perspective (pp. 145-161). New York: Springer-Verlag.
52. Vulliamy, G., & Webb, R. (2000). Stemming the tide of rising school exclusions: Problems and possibilities. British Journal of Education Studies, 48, 119-133.
53. West, D.J., & Farrington, D.P. (1977). The delinquent way of life. London: Heinemann.
54. Wikström, P.-O. (2004). Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In J. McCord (Ed.), Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime (pp. 1-38). New Brunswick: Transaction.
55. Wikström, P.O., & Sampson, R.J. (2003). Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In B. Lahey, T. Moffit, & A. Caspi (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency (pp. 118-152). New York: The Gutldford Press.
56. Willner, P. (2000). Further validation and development of a screening instrument for the assessment of substance misuse in adolescents. Addiction, 95, 1691-1698.
57. Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity (pp. 44-83). London: Sage.