Intergenerational educational encounters: Part 1: A model of knowledge

Educational Gerontology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-22

  Gamliel, Tova ^a   Reichental, Yael ^b   Ayal, Nitza ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845411635     PISSN: 03601277     EISSN: 15210472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03601270600995878     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Angersbdach, H. L. & Jones-Forster, S. (1999). Intergenerational interactions: A descriptive analysis of elder-child interactions in a campus-based child care center. Child and Youth Services, 20(1/2), 117-128.
2. Aphek, E. (2002a). Children of the information age: A reversal of roles. Retrieved September IS, 2004, from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde8/articles/ aphek.htm
3. Aphek, E. (2000b). Children tutoring seniors at internet skills: An exeriment conducted at one Israeli elementary school. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde4/Ednatxt2.htm
4. Aphek, E. (2002c). Minimizing the digital divide and the intergenerational gap. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://www. techlearning.com/db_area/ archives/WCE/archives/aphek.htm
5. Aphek, E. (2002d). Preserving culture in a technological environment. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://www.developingteachers.com/ articles_tchtraining/ meeting_edna.htm
6. Arber, S. & Attias-Donfut, C. (2000). The myth of generational conflict. New York: Routledge.
7. Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
8. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
9. Bostrom, A. K. (2003). Intergenerational learning in Stockholm county in Sweden: A practical example of elderly men working in compulsory schools as a benefit for children. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(4), 7-24.
10. Caro, F. G., Bass, S. A., & Chen, Y. P. (1993). Introduction: Achieving a productive aging society. In S. A. Bass, F. G. Caro, & Y. P. Chen (Eds.), Achieving a productive aging society (pp. 3-40). Wesport, Connecticut: Auburn House.
11. Cibulski, O. & Bergman, S. (1981). Mutuality of learning between the old and the young: A case study in Israel. Ageing and Society, 1(2), 247-262.
12. Collard, D. (2001). The generational bargain. Intergenerational Journal of Social Welfare, 10, 54-65.
13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1974). Flow: Studies of enjoyment (PHS Grant Report), Chicago: University of Chicago.
14. Cummings, S. M., Williams, M. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2002). Impact of an intergenerational program on 4th graders' attitudes toward elders and school behaviors. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 6(3), 91-107.
15. Dreitzel, H. P. (1984). Generational conflict from the point of view of civilization theory. In V. Garms-Homolova, E. M. Hoerning, & D. Schaeffer (Eds.), Intergenerational relationships (pp. 17-26). Lewiston, New York: C. J. Hogrefe.
16. Dunham, C. C. & Bengtson, V. L. (1986). Conceptual and theoretical perspectives on generational relations. In N. Datan, A. L. Greene, & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology intergenerational relations (pp. 2-27). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Dunkle, R. E. & Mikelthun, B. G. (1982). Intergenerational programming: An adopt-a-grandparent program in a retirement community. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 3(2), 93-105.
18. Durkheim, E. (1956). The division of labor in society (G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Free Press (1893).
19. Furlong, M. S. (1989). An electronic community for older adults: The Senior Network. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 145-153.
20. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
21. Granville, G. & Ellis, S. W. (1999). Developing theory into practice: Researching intergenerational exchange. Education and Ageing, 14(3), 231-248.
22. Gratton, B. & Haber, C. (1996). Three phases in the history of American grandparents: Authority, burden, companion. Generations, 20(1), 7-12.
23. Gubrium, J. F. (1993). For a cautious naturalism. In J. A. Holstein and G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism: Debates in social problems theory, Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
24. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
25. Hockey, J. & James, A. (1993). Growing up and growing old: Aging and dependency in the life course. London: Sage.
26. Howard, L. (2004). Intergenerational exchange patterns and their correlates in an aging Israeli cohort author. Research on Aging, 26(2), 202-223.
27. Jean-Pierre, B. & Yaron, K. (1988). A model of community age-integrated for the elderly in Israel: Does it work? The Journal of Aging and Judaism, 3(1/2), 58-84.
28. Kondratowitz, H. J. (1984). Long-term changes in attitudes toward old age. In V. Garms-Homolova, E. M. Hoerning, & D. Schaeffer (Eds.), Intergenerational relationships (pp. 27-38). Lewiston, New York: C. J. Hogrefe.
29. Kupetz, B. N. (1994). Ageism: A prejudice touching both young and old. Day Care and Early Education, 21(3), 34-37.
30. Laws, G. (1995). Understanding ageism: Lessons from feminism and post-modernism. The Gerontologist, 35, 112-118.
31. Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment. New York: Natural History Museum.
32. Newman, S. (1989). A history of intergenerational program. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 20(3/4), 1-16.
33. Newman, S., Faux, R., & Larimer, B. (1997). Children's views on aging: Their attitudes and values. The Gerontologist, 37(3), 412-417.
34. Newman, S., Morris, G. A., & Streetman, H. (1999). Elder-child interaction analysis: An observation instrument for classrooms involving older adults as members, tutors, or resource persons. Child and Youth Services, 20(1/2), 129-145.
35. Newman, S. & Riess, J. (1992). Older workers in intergenerational child care. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 19(2) 45-66.
36. O'connor, M. (1993). Generation to generation. Linking schools with older people. New York: Cassell.
37. Palmore, E. B. (1991). Ageism. Negative and positive. New York: Springer.
38. Plaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children. New-York: The Norton library.
39. Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Proller, N. L. (1989). The effects of an adoptive grandparent program on youth and elderly participants. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 20(3/4), 195-203.
41. Riley, M. W., Kahn, R. L., & Foner, A. (1994). Age and structural lag: Society's failure to provide meaningful opportunities in work, family and leisure. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
42. Ryan, E. B. & Heaven, R. K. B. (1986). Promoting vitality among older adults with computers. In F. A. McGuire (Ed.), Computer technology and the aged. Implications and applications for activity programs (pp. 15-29). New York: Haworth.
43. Schutz, A. (1967). On phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
44. Solso, R. L. (2001). Cognitive Psychology (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
45. Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Cognitive psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
46. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Tornstam, L. (1997). Gerotranscendence: The contemplative dimension of aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 11(2), 143-154.
48. Turner, B. S. (1987). Ageing, dying and death. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), Medical power and social knowledge (pp. 111-130). London: Sage.
49. Waddock, S. A. & Freedman, M. (1998-1999). Reducing the generation gap and strenghening schools. Generations, 22(4), 54-57.
50. Wrenn, R. M., Merdinger, J., Parry, J. K., & Dorothy, M. (1991). The elderly and the young: A cooperative endeavor. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 17(1/2), 93-104.
51. Xaverius, P. K. & Mathews, R. M. (2003). Evaluating the impact of intergenerational activities on elders' engagement and expressiveness levels in two settings. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(4), 53-69.