Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of lymphoproliferative disorders - Interpretations based on morphologic criteria alone: Results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 130, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1766-1771

  Young, Nancy A ^a   Moriarty, Ann T ^b   Haja, Jennifer C ^c   Wilbur, David C ^d  

^a FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b AmeriPath Indiana ^*  (United States)

^c North Carolina   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HODGKIN DISEASE; HUMAN; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; LABORATORY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LARGE CELL LYMPHOMA; LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MORPHOLOGY; NONHODGKIN LYMPHOMA; QUALITY CONTROL;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS; PATHOLOGY, SURGICAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 33845406553     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Jaffe E, Harris N, Stein H, Vardiman J, eds. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2001. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours.
2. Young NA, Al-Saleem TI, Ehya H, Smith MR. Utilization of fine needle aspiration cytology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis and subclassification of primary and recurrent lymphoma. Cancer Cytopathol. 1998;84:252-261.
3. Young N, Al-Saleem T. Diagnosis of lymphoma by fine-needle aspiration cytology in the REAL era. Cancer Cytopathol. 1999;87:325-345.
4. Meda BA, Buss DH, Woodruff RD, et al. Diagnosis and subclassification of primary and recurrent lymphoma: the usefulness and limitations of combined fine-needle aspiration cytomorphology and flow cytometry. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113:688-699.
5. Liu K, Stern RC, Rogers RT, Dodd LC, Mann KP. Diagnosis of hematopoietic processes by fine-needle aspiration in conjunction with flow cytometry: a review of 127 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;24:1-10.
6. Mourad WA, Tulbah A, Shoukri M, et al. Primary diagnosis and REAL/WHO classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by fine-needle aspiration: cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic approach. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;28:191-195.
7. Hehn ST, Grogan TM, Miller TP. Utility of fine-needle aspiration as a diagnostic technique in lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3046-3052.
8. Zeppa P, Marino G, Troncone G, et al. Fine-needle cytology and flow cytometry immunophenotyping and subclassification of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a critical review of 307 cases with technical suggestions. Cancer. 2004;102:55-65.
9. Ravinsky E, Morales C, Kutryk E, Chrobak A, Paraskevas F. Cytodiagnosis of lymphoid proliferations by fine needle aspiration biopsy: adjunctive value of flow cytometry. Acta Cytol. 1999;43:1070-1078.
10. Wakely PE Jr. Fine-needle aspiration cytopathology in diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphoma: accurate and reliable? Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;22:120-125.
11. Young NA, Mody DR, Davey DD. Misinterpretation of normal cellular elements in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens: observations from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:670-675.
12. Troxell ML, Bangs CD, Cherry AM, Natkunam Y, Kong CS. Cytologic diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma. Cancer. 2005;105:310-318.