Ecological factors limiting the distribution of Gilia tricolor in a California grassland mosaic

Ecology

Volumn 87, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 2736-2745

  Baack, Eric J ^a,b   Emery, Nancy C ^a   Stanton, Maureen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distribution ecology; Germination niche; Gilia tricolor; Range limits; Regeneration niche; Seed transplant; Serpentine soil; Species boundary

Indexed keywords

ACCUMULATION RATE; ADAPTATION; ANGIOSPERM; BIOMASS; BOUNDARY CONDITION; COASTAL STRUCTURE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DEMOGRAPHIC METHOD; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GRASSLAND; HABITAT STRUCTURE; HETEROGENEITY; LIMITING FACTOR; LITTER; NATIVE SPECIES; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEEDLING EMERGENCE; SOIL CHEMISTRY;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; FERTILITY; FLOWER; PHYSIOLOGY; SOIL; STANDARD; SURVIVAL; UNITED STATES;

ANGIOSPERMS; BIOMASS; CALIFORNIA; ECOSYSTEM; FERTILITY; FLOWERS; SOIL; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

GILIA TRICOLOR;

EID: 33845391167     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: 00129658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2736:EFLTDO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Angert, A. L., and D. W. Schemske. 2005. The evolution of species' distributions: reciprocal transplants across the elevation ranges of Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii. Evolution 59:1671-1684.
2. Antonovics, A., A. J. McKane, and T. J. Newman. 2006. Spatiotemporal dynamics in marginal populations. American Naturalist 167:16-27.
3. Bauder, E. T. 1987. Species assortment along a small-scale gradient in San Diego vernal pools. Dissertation. Univerisity of California, Davis, California, USA and San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
4. Bauder, E. T. 2000. Inundation effects on small-scale plant distributions in San Diego, California vernal pools. Aquatic Ecology 34:43-61.
5. Brown, J. H., G. C. Stevens, and D. M. Kaufman. 1996. The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:597-623.
6. Bullock, J. M., R. J. Edwards, P. D. Carey, and R. J. Rose. 2000. Geographical separation of two Ulex species at three spatial scales: does competition limit species' ranges? Ecography 23:257-271.
7. Case, T. J., and M. L. Taper. 2000. Interspecific competition, environmental gradients, gene flow, and the coevolution of species' borders. American Naturalist 155:583-605.
8. Connell, J. H. 1961. Effects of competition, predation by Thais lapillus, and other factors on natural populations of the barnacle Balanus balanoides. Ecological Monographs 31:61-104.
9. Crain, C. M., B. R. Silliman, S. L. Bertness, and M. D. Bertness. 2004. Physical and biotic drivers of plant distribution across estuarine salinity gradients. Ecology 85:2539-2549.
10. Donnelly, J. P., and M. D. Bertness. 2001. Rapid shoreward encroachment of salt marsh cordgrass in response to accelerated sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 98:14218-14223.
11. Etterson, J. R. 2004. Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. II. Genetic architecture of three populations reciprocally planted along an environmental gradient in the great plains. Evolution 58:1459-1471.
12. Etterson, J. R., and R. G. Shaw. 2001. Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294:151-154.
13. GarciaRamos, G., and M. Kirkpatrick. 1997. Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51:21-28.
14. Gaston, K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
15. Geber, M. A., and V. M. Eckhart. 2005. Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. II. Fitness variation across a subspecies border. Evolution 59:521-531.
16. Gilman, S. E. 2006. Life at the edge: an experimental study of a poleward range boundary. Oecologia 148:270-179.
17. Godinez-Alvarez, H., T. Valverde, and P. Ortega-Baes. 2003. Demographic trends in the Cactaceae. Botanical Review 69:173-203.
18. Grant, M. C., and J. Antonovics. 1978. Biology of ecologically marginal populations of Anthoxanthum odoratum. 1. Phenetics and dynamics. Evolution 32:822-838.
19. Gross, S. J., and T. D. Price. 2000. Determinants of the northern and southern range limits of a warbler. Journal of Biogeography 27:869-878.
20. Gurevitch, J. 1986. Competition and the local distribution of the grass Stipa neomexicana. Ecology 67:46-57.
21. Hoffmann, A. A., and M. W. Blows. 1994. Species borders-ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:223-227.
22. Holt, R. D., T. M. Knight, and M. Barfield. 2004. Allee effects, immigration, and the evolution of species' niches. American Naturalist 163:253-262.
23. Huntley, B., P. M. Berry, W. Cramer, and A. P. McDonald. 1995. Modeling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response surfaces. Journal of Biogeography 22:967-1001.
24. Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton. 1997. Evolution of a species' range. American Naturalist 150:1-23.
25. Kruckeberg, A. R. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils, and management problems. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
26. Levin, D. A., and K. Clay. 1984. Dynamics of synthetic Phlox drummondii populations at the species margin. American Journal of Botany 71:1040-1050.
27. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
28. Nagy, E. S., and K. J. Rice. 1997. Local adaptation in two subspecies of an annual plant: implications for migration and gene flow. Evolution 51:1079-1089.
29. Pennings, S. C., M. B. Grant, and M. D. Bertness. 2005. Plant zonation in low-latitude salt marshes: disentangling the roles of flooding, salinity and competition. Journal of Ecology 93:159-167.
30. SAS Institute. 2000. The SAS System for Windows, version 8.1. The SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
31. Williamson, J., and S. Harrison. 2002. Biotic and abiotic limits to the spread of exotic revegetation species. Ecological Applications 12:40-51.
32. Woods, K. D., and M. B. Davis. 1989. Paleoecology of range limits: beech in the Upper Penninsula of Michigan. Ecology 70:681-696.