Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 422-425

  Scaf, Gulnara ^a,c   Sakakura, C E ^a   Kalil, P F D ^a   Dearo De Morais, J A N ^a   Loffredo, L C M ^a   Wenzel, A ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Alveolar bone loss, measurement; Digital radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MANDIBLE; NONHUMAN; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; SWINE;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMALS; BICUSPID; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIODONTAL DISEASES; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SOFTWARE; SWINE; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 33845388830     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/61300663     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hintze H, Wenzel A. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 44-49.
2. Jacobsen JH, Hansen B, Wenzel A, Hintze H. Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesion depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems. Caries Res 2004; 38: 34-38.
3. Furkart AJ, Dove SB, McDavid WD, Nummikoski P, Matteson S. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 652-660.
4. Nair MK, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Denton G. Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 608-612.
5. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, van der Stelt PF. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997; 25: 215-224.
6. Baker LC. Benefits of interoperability: a closer look at the estimates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; 19: 22-25.
7. Benn DK, Bidgood WD Jr, Pettigrew JC Jr. An imaging standard for dentistry. Extension of the radiology DICOM standard. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 262-265.
8. Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. A non-Dicom based system for distributing and viewing digital images from multiple sources in dentistry. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG (eds). Computed assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 1999: pp 964-967.
9. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 203-208.
10. Berkhout WE, Sanderink GC, van der Stelt PF. A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 93-99.
11. Benediktsdottir IS. Digital panoramic radiography for assessment of mandibular third molars. [PhD thesis]. University of Aarhus, 2003.
12. Suomi JD, Plumbo J, Barbano JP. A comparative study of radiographs and pocket measurements in periodontal disease evaluation. J Periodontol 1968; 39: 311-315.
13. Pepelassi EA, Diamanti-Kipioti A. Selection of the most accurate method of conventional radiography for the assessment of periodontal osseous destruction. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 557-567.
14. Akesson L, Hakansson J, Rohlin M. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level. J Clin Periodontol 1992; 19: 326-332.