Interpreting spatial terms involves simulating interactions

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 682-688

  Carlson, Laura A ^a   Kenny, Ryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845367624     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193981     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BARSALOU, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
2. BEUN, R.-J., & CREMERS, A. H. M. (1998). Object reference in a shared domain of conversation. Pragmatics & Cognition, 6, 121-152.
3. CARLSON-RADVANSKY, L. A., COVEY, E. S., & LATTANZI, K. M. (1999). "What" effects on "where": Functional influences on spatial relations. Psychological Science, 10, 516-521.
4. CHAMBERS, C. G., TANENHAUS, M. K., EBERHARD, IC M., FILIP, H., & CARLSON, G. N. (2001). Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 30-49.
5. COVENTRY, K. R., & GARROD, S. C. (2004). Saying, seeing and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
6. GLENBERG, A. M., & KASCHAK, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
7. GLENBERG, A. M., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379-401.
8. HERSKOVITS, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. LANDAU, B., & JACKENDOFF, R. (1993). "What" and "where" in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 16, 217-265.
10. LANGACKER, R. W. (1993). Grammatical traces of some "invisible" semantic constructs. Language Sciences, 15, 323-355.
11. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1996). Perspective talcing and ellipsis in spatial descriptions. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 77-108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. LOGAN, G. D., & SADLER, D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 494-529). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. TALMY, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 225-282). New York: Plenum.
14. ZWAAN, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 44, pp. 35-62). San Diego: Academic Press.