The influence of an external symbol system on number parity representation, or what's odd about 6?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 730-736

  Iversen, Wiebke ^a,d   Nuerk, Hans Christoph ^c   Jäger, Ludwig ^a,b   Willmes, Klaus ^b  

^a Collaborative Research Centre: Media and Cultural Communication ^*  (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845351535     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193988     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. BERINGER, J. (2000). Experimental Run Time System [Computer software]. Frankfurt am Main: BeriSoft.
2. BRYSBAERT, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 434-452.
3. BULL, R., MARSCHARK, M., & BLATTO-VALLEE, G. (2005). SNARC hunting: Examining number representation in deaf students. Learning & Individual Differences, 15, 223-236.
4. DEHAENE, S., BOSSINI, S., & GIRAUX, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
5. DEHAENE, S., SPELKE, E., PINEL, P., STANESCU, R., & TSIVKIN, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
6. FIAS, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect Psychological Research, 65, 250-259.
7. FIAS, W., BRYSBAERT, M., GEYPENS, F., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC-effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110.
8. GORDON, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496-499.
9. IVERSEN, W., NUERK, H.-C., & WILLMES, K. (2004). Do signers think differently? The processing of number parity in deaf participants. Cortex, 40, 176-178.
10. LEMER, C., DEHAENE, S., SPELKE, E., & COHEN, L. (2003). Approximate quantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1942-1958.
11. LORCH, R. F., JR., & MYERS, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149-157.
12. NUERK, H.-C., IVERSEN, W., & WILLMES, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 835-863.
13. NUERK, H.-C., WOOD, G., & WILLMES, K. (2005). The universal SNARC effect: The association between number magnitude and space is amodal. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187-194.
14. PICA, P., LEMER, C., IZARD, V., & DEHAENE, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499-503.
15. ZHANG, J., & NORMAN, D. A. (1995). A representational analysis of numeration systems. Cognition, 57, 271-295.