Dual-bolus approach to quantitative measurement of pulmonary perfusion by contrast-enhanced MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1284-1290

  Risse, Frank ^a   Semmler, Wolfhard ^a   Kauczor, Hans Ulrich ^a   Fink, Christian ^a,b  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced MRI; Dual bolus; Lung; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Perfusion

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADODIAMIDE;

ADULT; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; BREATH HOLDING; CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; DRUG INJECTION VOLUME; DRUG TISSUE LEVEL; DUAL BOLUS APPROACH; GENERALIZED AUTOCALIBRATING PARTIALLY PARALLEL ACQUISITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; LUNG BLOOD FLOW; LUNG BLOOD VOLUME; LUNG PARENCHYMA; LUNG PERFUSION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SIGNAL DETECTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TWO DIMENSIONAL FAST LOW ANGLE SHOT;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; LUNG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; PULMONARY CIRCULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33845336875     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20747     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Neumann RD, Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. Current status of ventilation-perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med 1980;10:198-217.
2. Fazio F, Wollmer P. Clinical ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Clin Physiol 1981;1:323-337.
3. Nikolaou K, Schoenberg SO, Brix G, et al. Quantification of pulmonary blood flow and volume in healthy volunteers by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a parallel imaging technique. Invest Radiol 2004;39:537-545.
4. Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Murase K, et al. Quantitative assessment of regional pulmonary perfusion in the entire lung using three-dimensional ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in 40 subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:353-365.
5. Fink C, Risse F, Buhmann R, et al. Quantitative analysis of pulmonary perfusion using time-resolved parallel 3D MRI - initial results. Rofo 2004;176:170-174.
6. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH, et al. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232:677-684.
7. Kostler H, Ritter C, Lipp M, Beer M, Hahn D, Sandstede J. Prebolus quantitative MR heart perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:296-299.
8. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210.
9. Fink C, Ley S, Risse F, et al. Effect of inspiratory and expiratory breathhold on pulmonary perfusion: assessment by pulmonary perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005;40:72-79.
10. Lassen NA, Perl W. Tracer kinetic methods in medical physiology. New York: Raven Press; 1979.
11. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954;6:731-744.
12. Uematsu H, Levin DL, Hatabu H. Quantification of pulmonary perfusion with MR imaging: recent advances. Eur J Radiol 2001;37:155-163.
13. Hatabu H, Tadamura E, Levin DL, et al. Quantitative assessment of pulmonary perfusion with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:1033-1038.
14. Wu O, Ostergaard L, Koroshetz WJ, et al. Effects of tracer arrival time on flow estimates in MR perfusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:856-864.
15. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part 1: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
16. Jerosch-Herold M, Seethamraju RT, Swingen CM, Wilke NM, Stillman AE. Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:758-770.
17. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466-473.
18. Neyran B, Janier MF, Casali C, Revel D, Canet Soulas EP. Mapping myocardial perfusion with an intravascular MR contrast agent: robustness of deconvolution methods at various blood flows. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:166-179.
19. Jerosch-Herold M, Hu X, Murthy NS, Rickers C, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial contrast enhancement with MS-325 and its relation to myocardial blood flow and the perfusion reserve. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:544-554.
20. Schuster DP, Kaplan JD, Gauvain K, Welch MJ, Markham J. Measurement of regional pulmonary blood flow with PET. J Nucl Med 1995;36:371-377.
21. Schober OH, Meyer GJ, Bossaller C, Creutzig H, Lichtlen PR, Hundeshagen H. Quantitative determination of regional extravascular lung water and regional blood volume in congestive heart failure. Eur J Nucl Med 1985;10:17-24.
22. Brudin LH, Valind SO, Rhodes CG, Turton DR, Hughes JM. Regional lung hematocrit in humans using positron emission tomography. J Appl Physiol 1986;60:1155-1163.
23. Serizawa S, Suzuki T, Niino H, Arai T, Hara T. Using H2(15)O and C15O in noninvasive pulmonary measurements. Chest 1994;106:1145-1151.