Global chain, local pain: Regional implications of global distribution networks in the German North Range

Growth and Change

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 570-596

  Hesse, Markus ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARGO HANDLING; DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; LOGISTICS; PORT;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; HAMBURG [GERMANY]; LOWER SAXONY; WILHELMSHAVEN;

EID: 33845317600     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: 14682257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00341.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 1992. Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16 (4): 571-587.
2. Brooks, M. 2004. The governance structure of ports. Review of Network Economics 3 (2): 169-184.
3. Bundesministerium für Umwelt (BMU), Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. 2004. Eckpunkte Hafenkonzept 2010. Berlin: BMU.
4. Capineri, C., and T. Leinbach. 2006. Freight transport, seamlessness, and competitive advantage in the global economy. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 6 (1): 23-38.
5. Coe, N., and M. Hess. 2005. The internationalization of retail: Implications for supply network restructuring in East Asia and Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 5 (4): 449-473.
6. Coe, N., M. Hess, H. Yeung, P. Dicken, and J. Henderson. 2004. Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 (4): 468-484.
7. Cox, A. 1999. Power, value and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 4 (4): 167-175.
8. Cox, A., J. Sanderson, and G. Watson. 2000. Power regimes. Mapping the DNA of business and supply chain relationships. London: Earlsgate.
9. Deecke, H. 1995. Schiffsgerechte Flüsse oder flußgerechte Schiffahrt. In Fahrwasservertiefungen und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Umwelt, ed. Schutzgemeinschaft Deutsche Nordseeküste e.V., 21-51. Wilhelmshaven: Schutzgemeinschaft Deutsche Nordseeküste e.V.
10. Deecke, H., and D. Läpple. 1996. German seaports in a period of restructuring. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 87 (4): 332-341.
11. De Ligt, T., and E. Wever. 1998. European distribution centres: Location patterns. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 89 (2): 217-223.
12. Dicken, P. 2003. Global shift, 4th ed. New York: Guilford.
13. Dicken, P., P. Kelly, K. Olds, and H. Yeung. 2001. Chains and networks, territories and scale: Towards a relational framework of analyzing the global economy. Global Networks 1 (2): 89-112.
14. Everett, S. 2005. Policy making and planning for the port sector: Paradigms in conflict. Maritime Policy and Management 32 (4): 347-362.
15. Financial Times Deutschland (FTD). 2005. Hapag-Lloyd drückt Expansionspläne durch (Hapag-Lloyd pushes expansion plans). August 21.
16. Fuchs, M. 2003. Governance in transnationalen Unternehmen und Wertschöpfungsketten. Zur Annäherung an ein theoretisches Konzept. Zeitschrift f. Wirtschaftsgeographie 47 (3-4): 177-187.
17. GAL Hamburg, Die Grünen Bremen, die Grünen Niedersachsen, die Grünen Schlosuig-Holstein, Fraktion die Grünen Im Burdestag, Grael-Fraktion Im Europaparlament. 1985. Alternative Hafen- und Küstenpolitik. Dokumentation des Internationalen Forums der Grünen, am 4./5. Mai 1985 in Hamburg.
18. Glaser, J., and D. Läpple. 2004. Wachstumsinitiative Süderelbe-Eckpunkte einer Clusterstrategie. Neues Archiv für Niedersachsen 2: 49-54.
19. Hall, P., M. Hesse, and J.-P. Rodrigue. 2006. Re-exploring the interface between transport geography and economic geography. Guest Editorial. Environment and Planning A 38 (8): 1401 -1408.
20. Hamburg Port Authority. 2005. 2005 port development plan. Hamburg, Germany: HPA.
21. Hamburg Port Authority. 2006. 2006 annual press conference-Press release, 25 Jan 2006. Hamburg, Germany: HPA.
22. Henderson, J., P. Dicken, M. Hess, N. Coe, and H. Yeung. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9 (3): 436-464.
23. Hesse, M. 2004. Land for logistics: Locational dynamics, real estate markets and political regulation of regional distribution complexes. Journal of Social and Economic Geography/Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geografie (TESG) 95 (2): 162-173.
24. Hesse, M., and J.-P. Rodrigue. 2004. The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography 12 (3): 171-184.
25. HVB-Group/Drewry Shipping Consultants. 2005. Port congestion-No quick fix. Hamburg, Germany: HVB-Group.
26. IBP Engineering (IBP), Institute for Shipping and Logistics (ISL), Port and Transport. Consulting Bremen GmbH. 1999. Feasibility study for a container and multiport in Wilhelmshaven. Bremen, Germany: IBP.
27. Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics (ISL). 2005. Analyse der Kooperationsmöglichkeiten der deutschen Häfen. Bremen, Germany: ISL.
28. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2005. Economic prospects and policy issues. In World economic outlook: Globalization and external imbalances. Washington, DC: IMF.
29. Jacobs, W. 2004. Institutional regimes and territorial competition: The case of the Port of Rotterdam. GaP-Research Group on Governance and Places. Working Paper Series 2004/13, University of Nijmegen. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud University.
30. Kreukels, A. 2003. Wie verankern sich Häfen im Raum? Drei Fragen an Anton Kreukels, Professor am Department für Stadt- und Regionaplanung der Universität Utrecht. DISP 154: 26-27.
31. Langlois, R. 2003. The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (2): 351-385.
32. Läpple, D. 2004. Entwicklungsperspektiven von Stadtregionen und ihrer lokalen Ökonomien. In Lokale Beschäftigung und Ökonomie: Herausforderung für die "Soziale Stadt", Hg. W. Hanesch, 95-117. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
33. Loyen, R., E. Buyst, and G. Devos, eds. 2003. Struggling for leadership: Antwerp-Rotterdam port competition between 1870 and 2000. Heidelberg, Germany/New York: Physica.
34. Machule, D. 2004. Wachsende Umlandgemeinden im Süden der Hamburger Metropolregion-Anmerkungen zu einem Experimentierfeld. In Wachsende Stadt: Leitbild, Utopie, Vision? ed. U. Altrock and D. Schubert, 309-320. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
35. McCalla, R. 1999. Global change and local pain. Journal of Transport Geography 7 (4): 247-254.
36. Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Niedersachsen Ports. 2005. Bericht über Schiffs- und Güterverkehr im Hafen Wilhelmshaven 2005. http://www.wilhelmshaven-port.de/download/statistiken/rep200513.pdf (accessed June 2006).
38. Notteboom, T. 2004. Container shipping and ports: An overview. Review of Network Economics 3 (2): 86-106.
39. Notteboom, T., and J.-P. Rodrigue. 2005. Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management 32 (3): 297-313.
40. Notteboom, T., and W. Winkelmans. 2001. Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy and Management 28 (1): 71-89.
41. Nuhn, H. 1999. Changes in the European gateway system-The case of seaports. Beiträge zur Regionalen Geographie Europas 47: 88-102.
42. Nuhn, H. 2005. Internationalisierung von Seehäfen. Vom Cityport und Gateway zum Interface globaler Transportketten. In Waren um die Welt bewegen. Strategien und Standorte im Management globaler Warenketten, ed. C. Neiberger and H. Bertram, 109-124. Mannheim, Germany: MetaGIS (= Studien zur Mobilitäts- und Verkehrsforschung, Bd. 11).
43. Nuhn, H., and J. Ossenbrügge. 1984. Räumliche Konflikte im Hamburger Hafenerweiterungsgebiet. Sozioökonomische und ökologische Auswirkungen einer wachstumsorientierten. Regionalpolitik. In Regionalpolitik zwischen Ökonomie und Ökologie. Hannover, ed. L. Schätzl, 129-162. Hannover: Geographische Gesellschaft zu Hannover (Jahrbuch der Geographischen Gesellschaft zu Hannover, Sonderheft 11).
44. Nuhn, H., J. Ossenbrügge, and E. Söker, eds. 1983. Expansion des Hamburger Hafens und Konsequenzen für den Süderelberaum. Durchführung der Umsiedlung Altenwerders und Reaktion der Betroffenen. Hamburg, Germany: Universität Hamburg (Arbeitsberichte und Ergebnisse zur wirtschafts- und sozialgeographischen Regionalforschung).
45. Planco Consulting. 2000. Bedarfsanalyse für einen Tiefwasserhafen in der Deutschen Bucht [Analysis of demand for a German deep-water port]. Essen, Germany: Planco.
46. Planco Consulting. 2003. Regional- und gesamtwirtschaftliche Bedeutung des Hamburger Hafens im Jahr 2001 [Regional economic and overall impact of the Port of Hamburg in 2001]. Essen, Germany: Planco.
47. Robinson, R. 2002. Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm. Maritime Policy and Management 29 (3): 241-255.
48. Rodrigue, J.-P. 2006. Challenging the derived transport demand: Geographical issues in freight distribution. Environment and Planning A 38 (September): 1449 -1462.
49. Roland Berger Consulting Group. 2000. Standortanalyse Tiefwasserhafen Deutsche Bucht [Comparative development study Jade-Weser Port Wilhelmshaven and Port Cuxhaven]. Hannover: Roland Berger.
50. Sheppard, E. 2002. The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography 78 (3): 307-330.
51. Slack, B., and A. Frémont. 2005. Transformation of port terminal operations: From the local to the global. Transport Reviews 25 (1): 117-130.
52. Slack, B., R. McCalla, and C. Comtois. 2002. Logistics and maritime transport: A fundamental change. Paper presented at the 98th AAG-Conference, Los Angeles, March 19-23.
53. Stolpe, H., and U. Obel. 1999. Ökologische Probleme des Containertransports. Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde 73 (2/3): 151-164.
54. Stopford, M. 1997. Maritime economics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
55. Storper, M. 1997. The regional world. Territorial development in a global economy. New York, London: Guilford.
56. Sturgeon, T. 2002. Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (3): 451-496.
57. Suarez-Villa, L. 2003. The E-economy and the rise of technocapitalism: Networks, firms, and transportation. Growth and Change 34 (4): 390-414.
58. Tozer, D., and A. Penfold. 2001. Ultra-large container ships (ULCS): Designing to the limit of current and projected terminal infrastructure capabilities. London: Lloyd's Register of Shipping.
59. TU Hamburg-Harburg, A Stadt- und Regionalökonomie. (2001): Die Hamburger Arbeitslandschaft. Struktur und Entwicklung von ausgewählten Tätigkeitsfeldern (Bearb: Birgit Kämpf, Dieter Läpple). Hamburg, Germany: Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg.
60. Van Klink, A. 2003. The Kempen nexus. In Struggling for leadership: Antwerp-Rotterdam port competition between 1870-2000, ed. R. Loyen, E. Buyst, and G. Devos, 143-159. Heidelberg, New York: Physica.
61. Weber, J. 2003. The project of the New Jade-Weser-Port. In Promet-Traffic-Traffico 15 (4): 271-275.
62. Weisbrod, R. 2004. Ports of the twenty-first century: The Age of Aquarius. In Moving people, goods, and information in the 21st century. The cutting edge infrastructures of networked cities, ed. R. Hanley, 47-61. New York: Routledge.
63. Yeung, H. 2005. The firm as social networks. An organizational perspective. Growth and Change 36 (3): 307-328.