More than meets the eye: The effect of planned fixations on scene representation

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 759-769

  Intraub, Helene ^a   Hoffman, James E ^a   Wetherhold, C Jeffrey ^a   Stoehs, Stacy Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845314332     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193699     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. AWH, E., MATSUKURA, M., & SERENCES, J. T. (2003). Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 52-63.
2. BAHCALL, D. O., & KOWLER, E. (1999). Attentional interference at small spatial separations. Vision Research, 39, 71-86.
3. CHELAZZI, L., DUNCAN, J., MILLER, E. K., & DESIMONE, R. (1998). Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2918-2940.
4. CHELAZZI, L., MILLER, E. K., DUNCAN, J., & DESIMONE, R. (2001). Responses of neurons in macaque area V4 during memory-guided visual search. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 761-772.
5. DESIMONE, R. (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1245-1255.
6. DESIMONE, R., & DUNCAN, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
7. DEUBEL, H., & SCHNEIDER, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
8. EPSTEIN, R., & KANWISHER, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
9. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155-160.
10. ERIKSEN, C. W., & ST. JAMES, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
11. FREYD, J. J. (1983). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 575-581.
12. FREYD, J. J. (1993). Five hunches about perceptual processes and dynamic representations. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 99-119). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. FUTTERWEIT, L. R., & BEILIN, H. (1994). Recognition memory for movement in photographs: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 163-179.
14. GOTTESMAN, C. V., & INTRAUB, H. (2002). Surface construal and the mental representation of scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1-11.
15. GOTTESMAN, C. V., & INTRAUB, H. (2003). Constraints on spatial extrapolation in the mental representation of scenes: View-boundaries versus object-boundaries. Usual Cognition, 10, 875-893.
16. HALPERN, A. R., & KELLY, M. H. (1993). Memory biases in left versus right implied motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 471-484.
17. HOCHBERG, J. (1986). Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 22:1-22:64). New York: Wiley.
18. HOFFMAN, J. E. (1998). Visual attention and eye movements. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 119-154). London: University College London Press.
19. HOFFMAN, J. E., & SUBRAMANIAM, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 787-795.
20. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 113-136.
21. HUBBARD, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
22. INTRAUB, H. (1981). Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 604-610.
23. INTRAUB, H. (1997). The representation of visual scenes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 217-221.
24. INTRAUB, H. (2001). Internalized constraints in the representation of spatial layout. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 677-678.
25. INTRAUB, H. (2002). Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momentum without movement? Visual Cognition, 9, 93-119.
26. INTRAUB, H. (2004). Anticipatory spatial representation in a deaf and blind observer. Cognition, 94, 19-37.
27. INTRAUB, H., BENDER, R. S., & MANGELS, J. A. (1992). Looking at pictures but remembering scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 180-191.
28. INTRAUB, H., & BERKOWITS, D. (1996). Beyond the edges of a picture. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 581-598.
29. INTRAUB, H., & BODAMER, J. L. (1993). Boundary extension: Fundamental aspect of pictorial representation or encoding artifact? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1387-1397.
30. INTRAUB, H., GOTTESMAN, C. V., & BILLS, A. J. (1998). Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition, 24, 186-201.
31. INTRAUB, H., GOTTESMAN, C. V., WILLEY, E. V., & ZUK, I. J. (1996). Boundary extension for briefly glimpsed photographs: Do common perceptual processes result in unexpected memory distortions? Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 118-134.
32. INTRAUB, H., & RICHARDSON, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &Cognition, 15, 179-187.
33. IRWIN, D. E., & GORDON, R. D. (1998). Eye movements, attention and trans-saccadic memory. Visual Cognition, 5, 127-155.
34. IRWIN, D. E., & ZELINSKY, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 882-895.
35. KERZEL, D. (2000). Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research, 40, 3703-3715.
36. KOWLER, E., ANDERSON, E., DOSHER, B., & BLASER, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897-1916.
37. LEOAULT, E., & STANDING, L. (1992). Memory for size of drawings and of photographs. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 75, 121.
38. MATHEWS, A., & MACKINTOSH, B. (2004). Take a closer look: Emotion modifies the boundary extension effect. Emotion, 4, 36-45.
39. MELCHER, D. (2001). Persistence of visual memory for scenes: A medium-term memory may help us to keep track of objects during visual tasks. Nature, 412, 401.
40. MORAN, J., & DESIMONE, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782-784.
41. POLLATSEK, A., BOLOZKY, S., WELL, A. D., & RAYNER, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain & Language, 14, 174-180.
42. POTTER, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 509-522.
43. RENSINK, R. A. (2000). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40, 1469-1487.
44. SANOCKI, T. (2003). Representation and perception of scenic layout. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 43-86.
45. SIMONS, D. J., & LEVIN, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
46. TIPPER, S. P., HOWARD, L. A., & HOUGHTON, G. (1998). Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1385-1393.
47. TSE, P. U., SHEINBERG, D. L., & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (2003). Attentional enhancement opposite a peripheral flash revealed using change blindness. Psychological Science, 14, 91-99.