Beyond the edges of a picture

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 581-598

  Intraub, Helene ^a   Berkowits, Deborah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008198021     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1423396     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London & New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bender, R. S. (1992) Boundary distortions in memory for pictures. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
3. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
4. Ellis, W. D. (Ed., Trans.) (1995). A source book of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Flexser, A. J., & Tulving, E. (1978) Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 85, 153-171.
6. Gibson, E. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
7. Hochberg, J. (1978). Perception (2d ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Hochberg, J. (1986). Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. J. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 22:1-22:64). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Intraub, H. (1992). Contextual factors in scene perception. In E. Chekaluk, & K. R. Llewellyn (Eds.), The role of eye movements in perceptual processes (pp. 45-72). Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: Holland.
10. Intraub, H., Bender, R.S., & Mangels, J. A. (1992). Looking at pictures but remembering scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 180-191.
11. Intraub H., & Bodamer, J. L. (1993). Boundary extension: Fundamental aspect of pictorial representation or encoding artifact? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1387-1397.
12. Intraub, H., Gottesman C. V., Willey, E. V., & Zuk, I. J. (1996). Boundary extension for briefly glimpsed pictures: Do common perceptual processes result in unexpected memory distortions? Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 118-134.
13. Intraub, H., & Richardson, M. (1989) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 179-187.
14. Johnson, M. K. (1983). A multiple-entry, modular memory system. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 17, 81-123.
15. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
16. Legault, E., & Standing, L. (1992). Memory for size of drawings and of photographs. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 121.
17. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspectives and the perception of objects. In J. Long and A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1991). Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: Testing a theory of face perception. Perception & Psychophysics. 50, 367-372.
19. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.