Application of the optimized Baxter model to the hard-core attractive Yukawa system

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 125, Issue 19, 2006, Pages

  Prinsen, Peter ^a   P̀mies, Josep C ^b   Odijk, Theo ^a   Frenkel, Daan ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b FOM INSTITUTE AMOLF   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES;

BAXTER MODEL; YUKAWA SYSTEM;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 33845289788     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2390699     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. P. Prinsen and T. Odijk, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 6525 (2004).
2. R. J. Baxter, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2770 (1968).
3. R. O. Watts, D. Henderson, and R. J. Baxter, Adv. Chem. Phys. 21, 421 (1971).
4. B. Barboy, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 3194 (1974).
5. P. T. Cummings, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, Mol. Phys. 31, 535 (1976).
6. B. Barboy and R. Tenne, Chem. Phys. 38, 369 (1979).
7. A. J. Post and E. D. Glandt, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4585 (1986).
8. G. Stell, J. Stat. Phys. 63, 1203 (1991).
9. D. Gazzillo and A. Giacometti, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4742 (2004).
10. N. A. Seaton and E. D. Glandt, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 1785 (1987).
11. W. G. T. Kranendonk and D. Frenkel, Mol. Phys. 64, 403 (1988).
12. M. A. Miller and D. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 535 (2004).
13. M. A. Miller and D. Frenkel, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S4901 (2004).
14. M. H. J. Hagen and D. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4093 (1994).
15. M. Dijkstra, Phys. Rev. E 66, 021402 (2002).
16. H. C. Andersen, J. D. Weeks, and D. Chandler, Phys. Rev. A 4, 1597 (1971).
17. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation (Academic, San Diego, 2002).
18. R. J. Speedy, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 8591 (1997).
19. R. J. Speedy, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 4387 (1998).
20. J. M. Polson, E. Trizac, S. Pronk, and D. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5339 (2000).
21. W. G. Hoover, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 1981 (1968).
22. The concept of "mathematical similarity" or "similarity" is well explained in G. I. Barenblatt, Similarity, Self-similarity and Intermediate Asymptotics (Consultant Bureau, N.Y., 1979). For instance, in our case, the pressure which was originally some function of, Β, and κ, is proposed to be a function of and τ only, via argumentation based on the optimized Baxter model. Hence, a system defined by 1, Β1, and κ1 is mathematically similar to that defined by 1, Β2, and κ2 if τ (Β1, κ1) =τ (Β2, κ2).