Analytic solutions for Baxter's model of sticky hard sphere fluids within closures different from the Percus-Yevick approximation

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 120, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 4742-4754

  Gazzillo, Domenico ^a   Giacometti, Achille ^a  

^a INFM   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COLLOIDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLIZATION; FLOCCULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MIXTURES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; THERMODYNAMICS;

MULTICOMPONENT FLUIDS; PERCUS-YEVICK APPROXIMATION;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 1842478850     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1645781     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. G. Stell, J. Stat. Phys. 63, 1203 (1991).
2. A. Jamnik, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10511 (1996).
3. A. Santos, S. B. Yuste, and M. López de Haro, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 6814 (1998).
4. A. Jamnik, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 8619 (2001).
5. R. J. Baxter, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2770 (1968).
6. R. J. Baxter, in Physical Chemistry, an Advanced Treatise, Vol. 8A, edited by D. Henderson (Academic, New York, 1971) Chap. 4.
7. R. O. Watts, D. Henderson, and R. J. Baxter, Adv. Chem. Phys. 21, 421 (1971).
8. B. Barboy, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 3194 (1974).
9. J. W. Perram and E. R. Smith, Chem. Phys. Lett. 35, 138 (1975).
10. B. Barboy and R. Tenne, Chem. Phys. 38, 369 (1979).
11. J. J. Brey, A. Santos, and F. Castaño, Mol. Phys. 60, 113 (1987).
12. L. Mier-y-Teran, E. Corvera, and A. E. Gonzalez, Phys. Rev. A 39, 371 (1989).
13. M. Ginoza and M. Yasutomi, Mol. Phys. 87, 593 (1996).
14. C. Tutschka and G. Kahl, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9498 (1998).
15. C. Tutschka and G. Kahl, Phys. Rev. E 62, 3640 (2000).
16. C. Tutschka and G. Kahl, Phys. Rev. E 64, 031104 (2001).
17. C. Tutschka, G. Kahl, and E. Riegler, Mol. Phys. 100, 1025 (2002).
18. D. Gazzillo and A. Giacometti, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9837 (2000).
19. D. Gazzillo and A. Giacometti, Physica A 304, 202 (2002).
20. D. Gazzillo and A. Giacometti, Mol. Phys. 100, 3307 (2002).
21. D. Gazzillo and A. Giacometti, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36, 832 (2003).
22. D. Gazzillo and A. Giacometti, Mol. Phys. 101, 2171 (2003).
23. J. Juanós i Timoneda and A. D. J. Haymet, Phys. Rev. A 40, 5979 (1989).
24. M. Ginoza, Mol. Phys. 99, 1613 (2001).
25. A. Jamnik, D. Bratko, and D. J. Henderson, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 8210 (1991).
26. J. S. Høye, E. Lomba, and G. Stell, Mol. Phys. 79, 523 (1993).
27. J. S. Huang, S. A. Safran, M. W. Kim, G. S. Grest, M. Kotlarchyk, and N. Quirke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 592 (1984).
28. D. Pini, A. Parola, and L. Reatto, Mol. Phys. 100, 1507 (2002).
29. J. C. Rasaiah and S. H. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 6396 (1985).
30. J. N. Herrera and L. Blum, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 5077 (1991).
31. We adopt the following terminological distinction. A SHS model is univocally defined by its Hamiltonian, whose specification requires two elements: the starting potential, and the sticky limit procedure. On the other hand, a particular solution is characterized by three elements: the same two of the model, plus an approximate closure for the OZ equation.
32. K. Katsov and J. D. Weeks, J. Stat. Phys. 100, 107 (2000).
33. G. Stell, Physica (Amsterdam) 29, 517 (1963).
34. A. J. Post and E. Glandt, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4585 (1986).
35. W. R. Smith, D. Henderson, and Y. Tago, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 5308 (1977).
36. 0 ≥ B.
37. D. Henderson and E. W. Grundke, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 601 (1975).
38. C. Regnaut and J. C. Ravey, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 1211 (1989).
39. S. Bravo Yuste and A. Santos, J. Stat. Phys. 72, 703 (1993).
40. S. Bravo Yuste and A. Santos, Phys. Rev. E 48, 4599 (1993).
41. N. A. Seaton and E. D. Glandt, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 4668 (1987).
42. W. G. T. Kranendonk and D. Frenkel, Mol. Phys. 64, 403 (1988).
43. M. A. Miller and D. Frenkel (private communication).
44. M. A. Miller and D. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 135702 (2003).