The Potential Role of Standards and Guidelines in the Development of an Evaluation Culture in Spain

Evaluation

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 437-453

  Bustelo, María ^a  

^a University Madrid   (Spain)

Author keywords

evaluation ethics; evaluation institutionalization; evaluation standards and guidelines; meta evaluation; normative codes

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845271657     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389006071291     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Beywl, W. and S. Speer (2004) ‘Data and Literature-Based Reflections on Western European Evaluation Standards and Practices’, in C. Russon and G. Russon (eds) International Perspectives on Evaluation Standards, pp.43–54. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bustelo Ruesta, M. (1999) ‘Diferencias entre evaluación e investigación: una distinción necesaria para la identidad de la evaluación de programas’, Revista Española de Desarrollo y Cooperación 4: 9–29.
3. Bustelo Ruesta, M. (2002) ‘¿Qué tiene de específico la metodología de la evaluación?’,in R. Bañón (ed.) La evaluación de la acción y de las políticas públicas, pp.35–60. Madrid: Díaz de Santos.
4. Bustelo, M. (2003) ‘Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation: Ideas from a Meta-Evaluation Study of Eleven Evaluation Processes of Gender Equality Policies in Spain’, Evaluation 19(4): 383–403.
5. Bustelo Ruesta, María (2004) La evaluación de las políticas de igualdad de género en España. Madrid: La Catarata.
6. Chelimsky, E. (1995) ‘Comments on the Guiding Principles’, in W. R. Shadish et al. Guiding Principles for Evaluators, pp. 53–54. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. House, E. R. (1995) ‘Principled Evaluation: A Critique of the AEA Guiding Principles’, in W. R. Shadish et al. Guiding Principles for Evaluators, pp. 27–34. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
8. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994) The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd edn, How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9. Patton, M. Q. (1982) Practical Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
10. Rossi, P. H. (1995) ‘Doing Good and Getting it Right’, in W. R. Shadish et al. (eds) Guiding Principles for Evaluators, pp. 55–60. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Schwandt, T. A. (2002) Evaluation Practice Reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.
12. Weiss, C. H. (1987) ‘Where Politics and Evaluation Research Meet’, in D. J. Palumbo (ed.) The Politics of Program Evaluation, pp. 47–69. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
13. Weiss, C. H. (1998) Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Widmer, T. (2004) ‘The Development and Status of Evaluation Standards in Western Europe’, in C. Russon and G. Russon (eds) International Perspectives on Evaluation Standards, pp. 31–42. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.